Jump to content

Recommended Posts

His use of language was pretty spot on, which makes me think he either was an American or a Brit ex pat.


I have not bothered to check, but use of 'z' for 's' would be the real clincher.


Walt is indeed from Walt Disney....it is generally used to out a member of the public passing themselves off as a service member, but there is a whole host of different categories now, including someone who has claimed to have tupped a Dragon.


The claim to own shares was nonsense, of course.


Perhaps he was confused, and is a guard at Bluewater....

Do you know that the last thing that Walt Disney wrote before he died was 'Kurt Russell'. He died before he could explain it, and even Russell claimed to have no clue.


However, I think it's now apparent that Walt knew, many years ago, that the only person to save us from this social unrest was Snake Plissken, aka....... Kurt Russell.


ePetition anyone?

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> walt disney? I assumed walter mitty the daydreamer

> and fantasist. Walt disney as in cartoon fantasy

> then, cool.

>

> "Perhaps he was confused, and is a guard at

> Bluewater" very likely!!! :)


I have no idea why I wrote Disney....when I meant to write Mitty....sorry, a senior moment.

ha ha, fair enough. Mind you wasn't walt disney a bit of a weirdo thinking about it? Didn't he have his head cryogenically frozen?

Thinking about it, rumours are that Britney Spears already has, the weird dancing was down to the fact that she's actually been dead, taxidermically preserved, and moved using animatronic technology!

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Do you know that the last thing that Walt Disney

> wrote before he died was 'Kurt Russell'. He died

> before he could explain it, and even Russell

> claimed to have no clue.

>

> However, I think it's now apparent that Walt knew,

> many years ago, that the only person to save us

> from this social unrest was Snake Plissken,

> aka....... Kurt Russell.

>

> ePetition anyone?




Like!

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Anyone here been banned from the Dulwich website?

> is on the Sydenham Town forum.



I love that he thinks he's been banned for disagreeing. I thought it might have been for his abusive posts?!

And a special message for Rick, as an EDF exile - good to have you here, and please don't go and get yourself banned. I may not exactly agree with all your views, and I do sometime find the left / right ding-dong tedious, but I do think it's better than everyone on a Forum having the same view, and congratulating themselves on how much more enlightened / realistic they are than those outside their magic circle.


Thought this from Sydenham forum's Tim L was pretty good. I read something the other day that said the main reason people left online communities was not because of conflicts, provocative posters, off-topic discussions, spam or technology trouble. It was because they* were no longer interesting.


Oh, and whilst I found myself agreeing with Eagle on that particular thread, those with differing views put them across in such a way that meant I wanted to read what they had to say and see things from their perspective. Perhaps rethink my own stance.


*not them, their online community. (Yet on EDF they may leave, but often return..)

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And a special message for Rick, as an EDF exile -

> good to have you here, and please don't go and get

> yourself banned. I may not exactly agree with all

> your views, and I do sometime find the left /

> right ding-dong tedious, but I do think it's

> better than everyone on a Forum having the same

> view, and congratulating themselves on how much

> more enlightened / realistic they are than those

> outside their magic circle.

>

> Thought this from Sydenham forum's Tim L was

> pretty good. I read something the other day that

> said the main reason people left online

> communities was not because of conflicts,

> provocative posters, off-topic discussions, spam

> or technology trouble. It was because they* were

> no longer interesting.

>

> Oh, and whilst I found myself agreeing with Eagle

> on that particular thread, those with differing

> views put them across in such a way that meant I

> wanted to read what they had to say and see things

> from their perspective. Perhaps rethink my own

> stance.

>

> *not them, their online community. (Yet on EDF

> they may leave, but often return..)



Well, thanks Katie, you say the nicest things. We take our - small l - liberalism seriously over here in Sydenham.

First I would like to say I disagree with the UK upraising methodology.


Given the UK has a corrupt financial system a corrupt political system and a corrupt legal system ? what did people think was going to happen.


Even poorly educated people can see politicians and bankers steeling and getting way with it. What example is that.


Before people go baying for blood please take a look back at history namely Germany Enabling Act of 1933

NN Wrote

----------------------------------------------------


Even poorly educated people can see politicians and bankers steeling and getting way with it.


Interesting the yobs was saying just that, when interviewed there explanation for looting. ?If the rich can do it why can?t I?

The repairs after the UK uprising will more than lightly reach into the millions. And this is wrong.


The time-bomb created by banking sector and fund managers is over 700 trillion dollars in derivatives, these derivatives have yet to be marked to market, I am sorry to say that when this happens the UK uprising will appear small in comparison.


Just incase anyone wants to know what 1 trillion looks like in time

A trillion seconds is 31,688 years.

New Nexus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The repairs after the UK uprising will more than

> lightly reach into the millions. And this is

> wrong.

>

> The time-bomb created by banking sector and fund

> managers is over 700 trillion dollars in

> derivatives, these derivatives have yet to be

> marked to market, I am sorry to say that when this

> happens the UK uprising will appear small in

> comparison.

>

> Just incase anyone wants to know what 1 trillion

> looks like in time

> A trillion seconds is 31,688 years.



nutter

Richard, that's not a nice thing to say.


Why does it make him nuts anyway?


The debts handed down by financiers is pretty flipping big and will never be paid off. In fact some Swiss banks are now talking about expanding the special drawing rights as a new global 'super currency' because the dollar is about to go tits up. They call it 'special drawing rights', but it will in effect be a currency and will be a way of re-branding the paper money/debt product for the more elite financial consumer and a way of by-passing the demise of the dollar as the global currency.

What on earth is this problem about the SDR now?


It was invented in 1969 FFS.


It's just a way for credit worthy governments to support their spending/debts if the banks go tits up. They borrow off eahc other instead of the banks. It's not rocket science.


If you want to understand what this means just remember that 40% of UK annual government spending is borrrowed. If we can't borrow it we're all fecked.


SDR covers our arses.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sadly I think you will never convince people like this. They think gardens have to be kept chopped back and controlled. My theory is that this comes from being (or trying to be) controlling in every aspect of their lives, so I doubt if anything you could say or show them would have any effect. But are they actually coming into your garden or leaning over into it and pulling up/damaging things? If so, maybe one of our community police people could have a word with them?
    • Dear Nature lovers - advice please. I am being harassed by a neighbour who doesn't like my standard of gardening which she calls 'messy'. (I have rewilded my garden with advice from the London Wildlife Trust and a gardening expert from The Times.) I have twice caught this neighbour and her husband pulling up my plants and damaging my trees. Plus she has photographed my house, and sent a dozen complaints to the Dulwich Estate about my plan to rewild the verge outside my property - approved by the Estate some 4 years ago in line with their stated policy of supporting biodiversity in and around Dulwich. What can I do to introduce these neighbours  to the benefits to us all of returning a portion of our gardens to nature?
    • Have you tried Southwark's leisure centres? As a regular attendee at Peckham, Camberwell, The Castle and speaking to friends, the dance routines for all ages are similar to Silver ones. In addition Natty, Bianca and Isac are brilliant instructors. 
    • I've been there for lunch a few times and the home cooked asian food (as part of Sweat Dreams cafe) is genuinely great and a must try. I think the food side of the business has been slow to be noticed but people are now realising what is actually hidden in plain sight.  As for the Aroma Lab coffee ... it is excellent, they are very welcoming and friendly (and unpretentious!). This Australian coffee snob is mightily impressed!!  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...