Jump to content

Recommended Posts

His use of language was pretty spot on, which makes me think he either was an American or a Brit ex pat.


I have not bothered to check, but use of 'z' for 's' would be the real clincher.


Walt is indeed from Walt Disney....it is generally used to out a member of the public passing themselves off as a service member, but there is a whole host of different categories now, including someone who has claimed to have tupped a Dragon.


The claim to own shares was nonsense, of course.


Perhaps he was confused, and is a guard at Bluewater....

Do you know that the last thing that Walt Disney wrote before he died was 'Kurt Russell'. He died before he could explain it, and even Russell claimed to have no clue.


However, I think it's now apparent that Walt knew, many years ago, that the only person to save us from this social unrest was Snake Plissken, aka....... Kurt Russell.


ePetition anyone?

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> walt disney? I assumed walter mitty the daydreamer

> and fantasist. Walt disney as in cartoon fantasy

> then, cool.

>

> "Perhaps he was confused, and is a guard at

> Bluewater" very likely!!! :)


I have no idea why I wrote Disney....when I meant to write Mitty....sorry, a senior moment.

ha ha, fair enough. Mind you wasn't walt disney a bit of a weirdo thinking about it? Didn't he have his head cryogenically frozen?

Thinking about it, rumours are that Britney Spears already has, the weird dancing was down to the fact that she's actually been dead, taxidermically preserved, and moved using animatronic technology!

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Do you know that the last thing that Walt Disney

> wrote before he died was 'Kurt Russell'. He died

> before he could explain it, and even Russell

> claimed to have no clue.

>

> However, I think it's now apparent that Walt knew,

> many years ago, that the only person to save us

> from this social unrest was Snake Plissken,

> aka....... Kurt Russell.

>

> ePetition anyone?




Like!

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Anyone here been banned from the Dulwich website?

> is on the Sydenham Town forum.



I love that he thinks he's been banned for disagreeing. I thought it might have been for his abusive posts?!

And a special message for Rick, as an EDF exile - good to have you here, and please don't go and get yourself banned. I may not exactly agree with all your views, and I do sometime find the left / right ding-dong tedious, but I do think it's better than everyone on a Forum having the same view, and congratulating themselves on how much more enlightened / realistic they are than those outside their magic circle.


Thought this from Sydenham forum's Tim L was pretty good. I read something the other day that said the main reason people left online communities was not because of conflicts, provocative posters, off-topic discussions, spam or technology trouble. It was because they* were no longer interesting.


Oh, and whilst I found myself agreeing with Eagle on that particular thread, those with differing views put them across in such a way that meant I wanted to read what they had to say and see things from their perspective. Perhaps rethink my own stance.


*not them, their online community. (Yet on EDF they may leave, but often return..)

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And a special message for Rick, as an EDF exile -

> good to have you here, and please don't go and get

> yourself banned. I may not exactly agree with all

> your views, and I do sometime find the left /

> right ding-dong tedious, but I do think it's

> better than everyone on a Forum having the same

> view, and congratulating themselves on how much

> more enlightened / realistic they are than those

> outside their magic circle.

>

> Thought this from Sydenham forum's Tim L was

> pretty good. I read something the other day that

> said the main reason people left online

> communities was not because of conflicts,

> provocative posters, off-topic discussions, spam

> or technology trouble. It was because they* were

> no longer interesting.

>

> Oh, and whilst I found myself agreeing with Eagle

> on that particular thread, those with differing

> views put them across in such a way that meant I

> wanted to read what they had to say and see things

> from their perspective. Perhaps rethink my own

> stance.

>

> *not them, their online community. (Yet on EDF

> they may leave, but often return..)



Well, thanks Katie, you say the nicest things. We take our - small l - liberalism seriously over here in Sydenham.

First I would like to say I disagree with the UK upraising methodology.


Given the UK has a corrupt financial system a corrupt political system and a corrupt legal system ? what did people think was going to happen.


Even poorly educated people can see politicians and bankers steeling and getting way with it. What example is that.


Before people go baying for blood please take a look back at history namely Germany Enabling Act of 1933

NN Wrote

----------------------------------------------------


Even poorly educated people can see politicians and bankers steeling and getting way with it.


Interesting the yobs was saying just that, when interviewed there explanation for looting. ?If the rich can do it why can?t I?

The repairs after the UK uprising will more than lightly reach into the millions. And this is wrong.


The time-bomb created by banking sector and fund managers is over 700 trillion dollars in derivatives, these derivatives have yet to be marked to market, I am sorry to say that when this happens the UK uprising will appear small in comparison.


Just incase anyone wants to know what 1 trillion looks like in time

A trillion seconds is 31,688 years.

New Nexus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The repairs after the UK uprising will more than

> lightly reach into the millions. And this is

> wrong.

>

> The time-bomb created by banking sector and fund

> managers is over 700 trillion dollars in

> derivatives, these derivatives have yet to be

> marked to market, I am sorry to say that when this

> happens the UK uprising will appear small in

> comparison.

>

> Just incase anyone wants to know what 1 trillion

> looks like in time

> A trillion seconds is 31,688 years.



nutter

Richard, that's not a nice thing to say.


Why does it make him nuts anyway?


The debts handed down by financiers is pretty flipping big and will never be paid off. In fact some Swiss banks are now talking about expanding the special drawing rights as a new global 'super currency' because the dollar is about to go tits up. They call it 'special drawing rights', but it will in effect be a currency and will be a way of re-branding the paper money/debt product for the more elite financial consumer and a way of by-passing the demise of the dollar as the global currency.

What on earth is this problem about the SDR now?


It was invented in 1969 FFS.


It's just a way for credit worthy governments to support their spending/debts if the banks go tits up. They borrow off eahc other instead of the banks. It's not rocket science.


If you want to understand what this means just remember that 40% of UK annual government spending is borrrowed. If we can't borrow it we're all fecked.


SDR covers our arses.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I mean I hold no portfolio to defend Gala,  but I suspect that is their office.  I am a company director,  my home address is also not registered with Companies House. Also guys this is Peckham not Royston Vasey.  Shoreditch is a mere 20 mins away by train, it's not an offshore bolt hole in Luxembourg.
    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...