Jump to content

Recommended Posts

His use of language was pretty spot on, which makes me think he either was an American or a Brit ex pat.


I have not bothered to check, but use of 'z' for 's' would be the real clincher.


Walt is indeed from Walt Disney....it is generally used to out a member of the public passing themselves off as a service member, but there is a whole host of different categories now, including someone who has claimed to have tupped a Dragon.


The claim to own shares was nonsense, of course.


Perhaps he was confused, and is a guard at Bluewater....

Do you know that the last thing that Walt Disney wrote before he died was 'Kurt Russell'. He died before he could explain it, and even Russell claimed to have no clue.


However, I think it's now apparent that Walt knew, many years ago, that the only person to save us from this social unrest was Snake Plissken, aka....... Kurt Russell.


ePetition anyone?

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> walt disney? I assumed walter mitty the daydreamer

> and fantasist. Walt disney as in cartoon fantasy

> then, cool.

>

> "Perhaps he was confused, and is a guard at

> Bluewater" very likely!!! :)


I have no idea why I wrote Disney....when I meant to write Mitty....sorry, a senior moment.

ha ha, fair enough. Mind you wasn't walt disney a bit of a weirdo thinking about it? Didn't he have his head cryogenically frozen?

Thinking about it, rumours are that Britney Spears already has, the weird dancing was down to the fact that she's actually been dead, taxidermically preserved, and moved using animatronic technology!

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Do you know that the last thing that Walt Disney

> wrote before he died was 'Kurt Russell'. He died

> before he could explain it, and even Russell

> claimed to have no clue.

>

> However, I think it's now apparent that Walt knew,

> many years ago, that the only person to save us

> from this social unrest was Snake Plissken,

> aka....... Kurt Russell.

>

> ePetition anyone?




Like!

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Anyone here been banned from the Dulwich website?

> is on the Sydenham Town forum.



I love that he thinks he's been banned for disagreeing. I thought it might have been for his abusive posts?!

And a special message for Rick, as an EDF exile - good to have you here, and please don't go and get yourself banned. I may not exactly agree with all your views, and I do sometime find the left / right ding-dong tedious, but I do think it's better than everyone on a Forum having the same view, and congratulating themselves on how much more enlightened / realistic they are than those outside their magic circle.


Thought this from Sydenham forum's Tim L was pretty good. I read something the other day that said the main reason people left online communities was not because of conflicts, provocative posters, off-topic discussions, spam or technology trouble. It was because they* were no longer interesting.


Oh, and whilst I found myself agreeing with Eagle on that particular thread, those with differing views put them across in such a way that meant I wanted to read what they had to say and see things from their perspective. Perhaps rethink my own stance.


*not them, their online community. (Yet on EDF they may leave, but often return..)

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And a special message for Rick, as an EDF exile -

> good to have you here, and please don't go and get

> yourself banned. I may not exactly agree with all

> your views, and I do sometime find the left /

> right ding-dong tedious, but I do think it's

> better than everyone on a Forum having the same

> view, and congratulating themselves on how much

> more enlightened / realistic they are than those

> outside their magic circle.

>

> Thought this from Sydenham forum's Tim L was

> pretty good. I read something the other day that

> said the main reason people left online

> communities was not because of conflicts,

> provocative posters, off-topic discussions, spam

> or technology trouble. It was because they* were

> no longer interesting.

>

> Oh, and whilst I found myself agreeing with Eagle

> on that particular thread, those with differing

> views put them across in such a way that meant I

> wanted to read what they had to say and see things

> from their perspective. Perhaps rethink my own

> stance.

>

> *not them, their online community. (Yet on EDF

> they may leave, but often return..)



Well, thanks Katie, you say the nicest things. We take our - small l - liberalism seriously over here in Sydenham.

First I would like to say I disagree with the UK upraising methodology.


Given the UK has a corrupt financial system a corrupt political system and a corrupt legal system ? what did people think was going to happen.


Even poorly educated people can see politicians and bankers steeling and getting way with it. What example is that.


Before people go baying for blood please take a look back at history namely Germany Enabling Act of 1933

NN Wrote

----------------------------------------------------


Even poorly educated people can see politicians and bankers steeling and getting way with it.


Interesting the yobs was saying just that, when interviewed there explanation for looting. ?If the rich can do it why can?t I?

The repairs after the UK uprising will more than lightly reach into the millions. And this is wrong.


The time-bomb created by banking sector and fund managers is over 700 trillion dollars in derivatives, these derivatives have yet to be marked to market, I am sorry to say that when this happens the UK uprising will appear small in comparison.


Just incase anyone wants to know what 1 trillion looks like in time

A trillion seconds is 31,688 years.

New Nexus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The repairs after the UK uprising will more than

> lightly reach into the millions. And this is

> wrong.

>

> The time-bomb created by banking sector and fund

> managers is over 700 trillion dollars in

> derivatives, these derivatives have yet to be

> marked to market, I am sorry to say that when this

> happens the UK uprising will appear small in

> comparison.

>

> Just incase anyone wants to know what 1 trillion

> looks like in time

> A trillion seconds is 31,688 years.



nutter

Richard, that's not a nice thing to say.


Why does it make him nuts anyway?


The debts handed down by financiers is pretty flipping big and will never be paid off. In fact some Swiss banks are now talking about expanding the special drawing rights as a new global 'super currency' because the dollar is about to go tits up. They call it 'special drawing rights', but it will in effect be a currency and will be a way of re-branding the paper money/debt product for the more elite financial consumer and a way of by-passing the demise of the dollar as the global currency.

What on earth is this problem about the SDR now?


It was invented in 1969 FFS.


It's just a way for credit worthy governments to support their spending/debts if the banks go tits up. They borrow off eahc other instead of the banks. It's not rocket science.


If you want to understand what this means just remember that 40% of UK annual government spending is borrrowed. If we can't borrow it we're all fecked.


SDR covers our arses.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sorry, not having a dig at Southwark for that.   I'm just shocked that next door they've chosen to abandon such an institutional community / family event so they can keep pumping out commercial stuff instead.   I suppose the same could happen here next although we don't really have any longstanding family events like that one.
    • No doubt the schools in Harrogate are being discussed on the East Harrogate Forum or whatever. Dulwich College is being discussed because it's local. Saying "ooh, there were loads of schools mentioned" is a bit dismissive. It was Dulwich College that referred sex abuse allegations about pupils to the police and Dulwich College that used the spectre of the police to suppress dissent. 🤔
    • Hi, I was just wondering what experiences any of you have had in relation to an Independent Panel review relating to the Permanent Exclusion of a SEN child. 1. General experience Any experiences, positive or negative, in general? 2. Clerks Associates UK Any experience of this entity acting as an "independent clerk" to an Independent Review Panel in a matter involving a Permanent Exclusion of a SEN pupil, also involving discrimination under the Equality Act 2010. There is limited publicly available information with regards to this "independent clerk"; however, I can see from their Annual Report & Accounts at Companies House that they are a small, privately owned organisation.   I am very concerned that there is a clear and material risk that they are highly dependent for their revenues and cash flow from the business that they receive from the school and its parent Trust (which has 9 schools in total under its management) who have appointed them. I also note that the Trust has a material employee relations dispute with their staff over underpayment of maternity pay whilst materially increasing the salaries of the highest paid Trust executives and other highly paid staff (presumably the Head Teachers). https://southwarknews.co.uk/news/community/teachers-at-six-charter-schools-walk-out-in-first-of-four-strike-days-planned-for-this-month/ Given the current situation, we have no choice but to engage in this process of an Independent Panel Review; however, we are concerned as to various elements including this one which is a key role in providing independence. 3. Independent SEN expert We have the right to an independent SEN expert to review the matter and provide their opinion to the Independent Review Panel. The concept is that this person is supposedly acting "independently" and also solely in respect of the SEN elements of the matter. We do not however know who this person is, their experience or level of independence. The last information that I can find in the public domain about the effectiveness of an Independent SEN expert is a UK govt report from 2014 which portrays a very mixed experience for parents. Hence, we are seeking to understand if anyone has any more recent experience of an Independent SEN expert in relation to an Independent Panel Review. Many thanks for any thoughts that you have based on your experience. For reasons of confidentiality, it is perhaps better to send any replies to me directly. Many thanks
    • Hang in there, friends. Most of us appreciate that you're trying you best and these companies are a nightmare!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...