Jump to content

Recommended Posts

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My understanding is temporary use to hold coaches

> for the Dulwich Private School Coach Service near

> to the schools rather than them parking where they

> should not at the schools.



Thanks James, but why would they need portakabins?


There are also two portaloos, which I can understand if coach drivers are there for a long time, but portakabins??

Michael Palaeologus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Accommodation for the Drivers between the morning

> and afternoon runs? If the coaches are staying

> their throughout the day, the Drivers need

> somewhere to stay.



Crikey, Radiant Bhuna, that doesn't sound very comfortable! There are no windows, for a start!

Michael Palaeologus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > Crikey, Radiant Bhuna, that doesn't sound very

> > comfortable! There are no windows, for a start!

>

>

> They need daylight to function?



Well I wouldn't fancy sitting around in artificial light all day!


I'm wondering now whether I actually meant Portakabins. Maybe they are just large containers. Who knows what for. Will have a closer look next time I'm up in that direction!

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> hammerman Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Yes, drove past the other day and there is

> > suddenly bright yellow gates with padlocks on

> so

> > who knows?

>

>

> Well, hoping someone knows is why I started the

> thread :))


Sorry, just stating 'the bright yellow gates with padlocks on so who knows' and like you I'm wondering what's going on with the old Harvester pub. Spent many a happy time with family and friends there and was sad it suddenly closed.

ruffers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't know if there were portakabins there

> previously, but as of last night what I saw was a

> couple of containers which would be used for

> storing equipment.



Yes, that was probably what I meant. Sorry for any confusion!


I assume coach drivers wouldn't need to store equipment, so could the containers be for builders?


Has any planning application (or whatever) actually been approved yet?


There was a public meeting about the future use of this land/building - last year I think? There is a thread about it on here somewhere. If memory serves, there was a possibility of some kind of community arts centre? (Chance would be a fine thing, I guess).

This should be a direct link to all planning applications for the Grove Tavern. I can't see anything recent - Louisa, what are we missing?


https://planning.southwark.gov.uk/online-applications/propertyDetails.do?activeTab=relatedCases&keyVal=_STHWR_PROPLPI_107631_2

From what I can gather, the company that originally ran the Harvester are still paying rent for the premises. That Dulwich Estates want to build flats on the site as they wish to get the income from developer. Dulwich Estates are not interested in low money making schemes!

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> To ease Traffic congestion on Lordship Lane and

> surrounding streets

> perhaps a part of the carpark could be used for a

> Park-and-Ride Scheme.

>

> DulwichFox


Brilliant idea foxy. Would certainly ease the congestion on residential streets. Ship the commuters off to ED or FH for Overground.


Louisa.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > To ease Traffic congestion on Lordship Lane and

> > surrounding streets

> > perhaps a part of the carpark could be used for

> a

> > Park-and-Ride Scheme.

> >

> > DulwichFox

>

> Brilliant idea foxy. Would certainly ease the

> congestion on residential streets. Ship the

> commuters off to ED or FH for Overground.

>

> Louisa.


It's something I have brought up on EDF before..


Foxy

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...