Jump to content

Football Focus

jenniejenjen10

By jenniejenjen10
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Emerson Crane

Emerson Crane

Posted
Posted
Can't argue with the spurs result last night, but the referee made some strange decisions, but don't they always? Some you win some you lose, which is exactly why I could never understand the furore over Thierry Henrys handball (whoops, this a bit like "Whatever you do don't mention the war" to some folks)
Jah Lush

Jah Lush

Posted
Posted
That's a red rag to a bull, especially to someone of Irish descent (I'm not). What Thierry did was blatant cheating. How the hell he got away with it is anyone's guess. It's a pity because it spoilt what was a pretty much unblemished record. Up until then he'd always seemed a fair player and a good sportsman.
Emerson Crane

Emerson Crane

Posted
Posted
I don't think they can argue too much about the incident. The Irish had a blatant gift of a penalty in the previous match which allowed them to go on to the next round. I don't recall too many people arguing the case against that. You can't have one rule for you and one rule for everyone else. We all get dodgy decisions for and against. Some would argue spurs should have only had 9 nine men on the pitch given Huddlestones blatant arm in the face of an opponent, but hey, its over and done. The Henry thing and the reluctance in some quarters to let it go does make me smile, especially as Dunn said he would have done exactly the same had the roles been reversed.
Jah Lush

Jah Lush

Posted
Posted

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> On a talk show after '86, Gary Lineker said he'd

> have done what Maradona did, and yet the English

> still go on about it 24 years later. The Irish

> will be bitter about Henry for decades to come!



That's all very well saying such guff after the event by my view of it and what Damien Duff said is that they would have done it if they thought they could have got away with it but because they didn't think they could get away with such behaviour they wouldn't have done. Ummmm....does that make sense?

Lineker was never even booked during his career. Anyway, as Mac said we have done this subject to death at the time it happened so I suppose we should all move on. Sorry I brought it up again.

Emerson Crane

Emerson Crane

Posted
Posted

Wigan 1 v Wolverhampton 2

Birmingham 1 v Everton, 1

Stoke 2 v Blackburn, 0

Sunderland 0 v Man Utd 2

Tottenham 1 v Aston Villa 1

West Brom 1 v Bolton 1

West Ham 2 v Fulham 1

Man City 3 v Newcastle 0

Liverpool 2 v Blackpool 0

Chelsea 2 v Arsenal 0 (can't see the Arsenal getting a result, not with the defensive fraility we have at the moment)

Jah Lush

Jah Lush

Posted
Posted

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Will Spurs become an east end club?

>

> At least it would be a hell of a lot easier to get

> to Jah! Forest Hill to Canada Water, Jubilee

> straight to Stratford. About half hour! :)-D



True, and I know it's a pain in the arse to get to but I'd prefer us to stay at White Hart Lane. It's our home. And as Quids has rightly pointed out it's in West Ham territory.

Haringary Council has approved our plans and now all it needs is for Boris Johnson to agree to them. Hopefully we'll stay right where we are, in our own manor.

Emerson Crane

Emerson Crane

Posted
Posted

This fella has a very high opinion of himself



An international footballer was court offside today after a judge told him he was not famous enough to be exempt ? from JURY SERVICE.


Angry Carl Fletcher ? captain of League One side Plymouth Argyle ? was first called up to sit on a jury in June.


Midfielder Carl, 30, a former Welsh international, was on holiday with his wife and three children at the time and was granted a deferment.


But when he was re-listed for duty he told the court he was not available because of work commitments.


Carl was then told to attend Plymouth Crown Court to show ?good cause? why he should not be a juror on a trial.


He explained that he could not sit on the jury next week because of a scheduled away match at Cheltenham Town on Tuesday.


But Judge Francis Gilbert QC said the match was ?not a valid excuse? and that Fletcher was less famous than other previous jury members.


Fletcher then said he was a well know face around Plymouth in Devon ? before storming out of the courtroom.


Judge Francis told him: ?Jury service is an important public duty everyone has to do, including judges, however well-known they are.


?Captaining Plymouth Argyle is not sufficient reason for not doing jury service. Employers are required to give you time off for jury service as a matter of law.


?So far, what you?ve said is not sufficient. You will have to come next Monday unless you make a proper application.


?Lots of well-known people, some more famous than you, have been required to sit on juries.?


Fletcher appeared in court on Wednesday to argue the case that he was too well known, adding: ?I don?t want anything to come back on me for sitting on a jury.?


The heated exchange began when Fletcher, wearing a grey sweatshirt and dark blue jeans, strode into the witness box clutching a letter from one of the Argyle directors.


He told the judge he had planned to travel with the team next Monday to Cheltenham Town to prepare for Tuesday evening?s Johnstone?s Paint Trophy match.


But Judge Gilbert told him he should have written to the court saying when he would not be available ? but Fletcher replied he had not been able to plan his work commitments.


Judge Gilbert told him he could travel on the day of the game, and if required for a trial that day would still have time to drive or be driven to the match for the 7.45pm kick-off after court closed around 4pm.


The Judge also added that potential jurors had to serve within 12 months of being called unless excused.


He said Fletcher would be one of 12 jurors, and if he felt threatened ?in any way? he should report it to the police.


Judge Gilbert explained the only two reasons for exclusion from jury service were previous convictions or ?mental disorder?, asking if either applied to him.


The midfielder replied: ?You?ll have to ask my wife on that one.?


Carl then unsuccessfully demanded the judge?s name and stormed out of the court, adding: ?I am glad I have to pay my taxes to do jury service.?


Fletcher, a former Wales international started his career at Bournemouth before moving to West Ham United in 2004.


He also played for Watford, Crystal Palace and Nottingham Forest before signing for Plymouth Argyle last year.


A spokesman for Plymouth Argyle refused to comment.



INCREDIBLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You couldn't make it up.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Dave 3
      Be careful on the pavements...

      By Dave 3 · Posted

      It’s a 4 year old on a bike do you really think he is going 15mph. Grown adults complaining about a child who probably isn’t able to string a few sentences together says a lot about the people in this forum. If this member was hit from behind the father was probably walking behind the bike so I don’t get the point of stretching out an overreaction from a child in Nursery bumping into you. Grow up Obviously a four year old should be cycling on the pavement.
    • Sue
      Be careful on the pavements...

      By Sue · Posted

      Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • Dave 3
      Be careful on the pavements...

      By Dave 3 · Posted

      Completely jobless and lunatic behaviour coming on a forum and complaining about a 4 year old and the child’s bike riding skills. Honestly grow up
    • Loutwo
      Franklins is being sold

      By Loutwo · Posted

      I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...