Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Emerson Crane Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The home of football to me is a term of affection

> for the club I love, nothing more nothing less. I

> leave it to others to think whatever they wish of

> that phrase.


If you were going to fall in love, you could have picked a better club. One that wins things. Have you ever thought of changing?

To say Liverpool? Who haven't won the title for.......remind me. Or say, excuse me while I gag, Tottenham who haven't won the title since, well ask Jah, he knows.


But seriously folks, support for a club is uncondtional, and is not dependent on your team winning. I've supported my team through good times and bad and so it will remain. I am not a fairweather supporter, and am not one of those that follows a club only through the good times. Glory hunters I believe they are called, ask anyone thats supported Man U since the early nineties, they'll know what that means. B)

It wasn't meant in a derogatory manner Mockney - or have I totally got the wrong end of the stick here? My Madrid team is Atletico, in fact they're my Spanish team having seen them play and visited the Calderon a few times now. I was quite pleased to see the Galacticos torn apart and made up to see Barca win. Brought back happy memories of their 4-0 drubbing at Anfield only 20 months ago.


Apparently, the majority of last night's team came through their academy.


I'm also flying home from Bucharest via Barcelona on Friday night, so I'm looking forward to a night out there!


Anyhoo, to think that Liverpool beat both of those teams in recent years, goes to show just had bad things have got at Anfield (the real home of football ;-) )

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...