Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Atila. You know when you are repeatedly banned and then you come back under a new name and for a while you are quite nice and people quite like you? Any chance you can stick to that instead of revering to just constant slagging others off?


That'd be nice

I don't see what's wrong with that statement. Allardyce is a snidey horrible man and deserves all he gets. All about opinion of course, which we are all entitled to.


My opinion about this thread is that it's a bit like play ground bullying sometimes. Everyone tries to goad Emerson in to a rant and then when it happens you all feign outrage.

Im pretty much on the same page as Atila about Allardyce and have no problem with the post per se. It's just that it's part of a pattern which we have seen in the past. There is nothing remotely wrong with it per se, but given how things have deteriorated before I'm trying to stop him getting banned again


Besides no one is provoking as far as I can see?

Hmmm


Well I never try and goad him into a rant but given that in this thread people get goaded all the time, he tends to have been the one to ask people out for a fight. You for example Anna have been hacked off before and just left for a while... a far better response

I'm trying to remember when it was games started getting postponed because of the conditions on the way to the match or around the ground, or am I remembering wrong when I think that never used to happen?


No one's forcing anyone to go to the game, and if they fall over outside surely then they're responsible for their own actions?

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Im pretty much on the same page as Atila about

> Allardyce and have no problem with the post per

> se. It's just that it's part of a pattern which we

> have seen in the past. There is nothing remotely

> wrong with it per se, but given how things have

> deteriorated before I'm trying to stop him getting

> banned again

>

> Besides no one is provoking as far as I can see?



I can't begin to tell you how patronising I find your post. Thanks Anna for telling it like it is. So you're on the "same page" as me so what's your problem. Your message is so school masterish its breathtaking. Pompous aint in it.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hmmm

>

> Well I never try and goad him into a rant but

> given that in this thread people get goaded all

> the time, he tends to have been the one to ask

> people out for a fight. You for example Anna have

> been hacked off before and just left for a

> while... a far better response


Yes Anna run along like a good girl and let the men speak. FFS, the prize for most patronising post is yours!!

Dude. I'm just trying to say chill, and you go nuts on me


You ARE a much more pleasant, reasonable person when you reregister. So you DO know the difference. You don't even rise to any goading for weeks. Then it all comes out.


If I say anything in support of you it's patronising. If i have a go I'm goading. Jesus

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I am trying to find out about people's experiences of the 4+ and 7+ assessments. I am a teacher and have a wealth of experience tutoring for theses assessments (including my own son), but it's always good to keep on top of things as they always make tweaks to them. TIA! 
    • "Sep, you don't even live here."   ???
    • "You have no idea why"   To be fair Sue, it's blindingly obvious to anyone who has a conversation with anyone who isn't a Corbyn supporter. And even some who liked Corbyn (like me initially) found him somewhat flaky even at his most popular But let's say you are right and I have NO idea why anybody might not vote for him. They still didn't vote for him. He lost two elections. The second one badly (and strongly predicted but the stubborn old goat wouldn't budge so we we were stuck with Johnson and another 3 million PMs in the 5 years that followed) So even with ZERO evidence, we have our eyes and ears and brains But we do have evidence   https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/27022-their-own-words-why-voters-abandoned-labour
    • As I said, it was my understanding. I worded it very carefully. I didn't/don't know for sure, so clearly not a fact. And hardly an "opinion", which is something completely different. You have no idea what reason anybody might have had for not voting for him (unless you can point to some opinion poll results which actually asked people?)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...