Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just returned from watching the match...and yep, although DE-LIGH-TED with the United/Chelsea score, I do think Chelsea were a bit unlucky today. As for Fulham/City...>:D<


BTW, did anyone else think that the ref. in the United/Chelsea match was just a little card-happy? Or is it just me?

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Celtic to beat the Gers by about 5 today....



Not even close.

At 1-2 down I still felt that we'd go on to win. Davis smashing the bar a minute into the second half confirmed this.

Wrongly disallowed goal too. Could have a should have been more.

I haven't seen many Lesser Spotted Scousers this shooting season, must be hiding in the bushes...Otta pops his head up from time to time though.

Nice result and performance by Spurs. They shouldn't have taken their foot off, might regret it, as it looks like they could be your main rivals for 4th place...a complete thumping would've knocked the confidence out of them a la L'Arse.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Celtic to beat the Gers by about 5 today....


Not sure I remember writing this. However was convinced Celtic would win. Disappointed to see the Gers are just as diligent under Ally as they were under Walter.


I guess we can put the loss down to our tough European committments though, which Rangers have been spared......?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • 🤣 re your mystic powers! Didn't want to just put a 🤣 on your post in case people thought I was laughing because the cat had been found!
    • Hopefully, they won't wash the changing room mats poolside in future so the filters won't be overworked keeping the water clean!!!
    • I agree with your sentiment, however you are mistaken about the Dulwich Estate. Their sole purpose is to make as much money as possible to give to the schools they support, as well as the almshouses and other historical buildings. They do not care about social housing (except subsidised housing for teachers of the schools), refreshing the area, low-rent studios, charming but affordable pub, etc. While they are a charity, their purpose is very constrained/focused and whatever they do with this site, it has to make money for them. It's not that they're being nasty or stingy, it's just what their statutes tell them they have to do. Note that I am not defending them, but knowing the above helps understand why they do what they do, even if sometimes it seems to go against the wishes of the local community. They are not answerable to the local community, and their only oversight is the charity commission and the courts. And of course, like all bureaucracies (esp those with limited oversight), they look after themselves very well. 
    • Perhaps responses are made by DM?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...