Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just returned from watching the match...and yep, although DE-LIGH-TED with the United/Chelsea score, I do think Chelsea were a bit unlucky today. As for Fulham/City...>:D<


BTW, did anyone else think that the ref. in the United/Chelsea match was just a little card-happy? Or is it just me?

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Celtic to beat the Gers by about 5 today....



Not even close.

At 1-2 down I still felt that we'd go on to win. Davis smashing the bar a minute into the second half confirmed this.

Wrongly disallowed goal too. Could have a should have been more.

I haven't seen many Lesser Spotted Scousers this shooting season, must be hiding in the bushes...Otta pops his head up from time to time though.

Nice result and performance by Spurs. They shouldn't have taken their foot off, might regret it, as it looks like they could be your main rivals for 4th place...a complete thumping would've knocked the confidence out of them a la L'Arse.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Celtic to beat the Gers by about 5 today....


Not sure I remember writing this. However was convinced Celtic would win. Disappointed to see the Gers are just as diligent under Ally as they were under Walter.


I guess we can put the loss down to our tough European committments though, which Rangers have been spared......?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...