Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bad day for the Spurs unfortunately. Next Sundays

> game is a must see.


I was at White Hart Lane today. The only way Wolves were going to score was from a set piece/corner which they duly did though it was never a corner and Adebayor had what I thought was a perfectly good goal ruled out for offside. We should have won today but as I said earlier in the week we'll drop points and so will everyone else.

Also, I think Spurs should do some work on the training ground of their own for set pieces. Our corners (usually Van Der Vaart taking them) are rubbish and we don't look capable of scoring from free-kicks either.


As for Arsene Wenger's observation that we've sold our soul to TV and its revenues. I think he is absolutely correct. It was good to go to a game two Saturday's in a row as I have just done in which the match kicked off at 3pm. That's how it always used to be. Everton and Spurs next games in the FA Cup are on a Friday night FFS! It's not right but that is the way things are these days.

The TV companies now dictate the fixture list not the FA. The FA make the fixtures and SKY or ESPN change them to suit their audience and to maximise their profits with their scheduling. Of course the clubs are well paid and to some extent rely on the TV money. I'm sure Spurs rely more than some other clubs on TV money as we don't have the capacity in our ground as clubs like Arsenal, Man Utd, etc etc. It's one of the reasons we want to build a bigger stadium. To earn more through gate money.

JL - I was at the Lane as well today and our set pieces were awful as they have been all year. With our wingers and full backs we are always going to win plenty of corners and I cannot remember us posing a threat all season (Kaboul may have had a header earlier in the year?). The number of times they hit the first man and it gets cleared is shocking.


Here's hoping for a better performance next Sunday.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I trust you watched Ulster last night Mick. That

> was proper entertainment!


Your kids may be off to university Dec. Mine are all under 10 so I don't get much sport in the evening. When little Rory grows up a bit we shall soon command the remote control. Hapoy days ahead.

Alan Hansen spot on tonight on MOTD. Too many people began to speak of spurs as potential champions after beating everton midweek being their game in hand. But today I think might help them this season. I think that no matter what happens against MC they can go on a run. They are unbeaten since August and todays result does not change that but only enhances it.

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well you've definitely irritated a few people on

> 'the mixed football at Peckham Rye thread' if my

> memory serves me right.


Sorry UDT, but I think you are mistaken. As far as I am aware, there is no way Mr. Medic has "irritated" any of us. In fact, some of us (me included) have been trying to sign him up!

Sharon, I think you're missing the point. Of course the 3 points matters most, but football on telly is huge business.


The top clubs could indeed get by, but why are they all so desperate to qualify for the CL? Because although it's not everything, the money is important to them.

No I haven't missed the point. I know that football on tv is huge business but it did quite well before sky existed. I think that teams always wanted to qualify for Europe anyway. It was usually always televised on normal" tv.I used to watch it before sky existed.

You can see from the finances that every single premiership club is completely reliant on TV cash to function.


Without it they couldn't pay the players or run the team.


Without the money, Arsenal would lose 29m a year, Man U would lose 183m a year, Spurs would lose 59m a year, Liverpool would lose 100m a year, Man Cty 179m a year...


It's no use saying their celebrity owners would bail them out, because the celebrity owners are only there because the football is on the telly.


ETA Looking at those figures again, I can seem that many clubs equal the TV revenue from sponsorship and commercial activities that are derived from their TV fame. Some of those clubs would lose almost 2/3 of their income without TV.


Saying they would survive is just wishful thinking.


I'm not suggesting football would cease to exist, but harking back to the olden days is irrelevant. That was when they paid footballers in beans and stadiums doubled as dog tracks.


I reiterate, current managers are in the entertainment business.

Exactly!


Of course football did just fine before Sky showed up, but Sky did show up, and changed things. Players never used to be paid tens of thousands a week.


The simple fact is, that if the TV money stopped tomorrow, the teams in the prem especially would find it very difficult to pay their players.


Wenger said it himself, they have sold their souls to the devil. But they are doing very well out of it.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Exactly!

>

> Of course football did just fine before Sky showed

> up, but Sky did show up, and changed things.

> Players never used to be paid tens of thousands a

> week.

>

> The simple fact is, that if the TV money stopped

> tomorrow, the teams in the prem especially would

> find it very difficult to pay their players.

>

> Wenger said it himself, they have sold their souls

> to the devil. But they are doing very well out of

> it.




Without tv they wouldn't be playing at the Emirates Stadium - but then again they wouldn't be playing at "Emirates Stadium"

Well done Swansea City. I thought Spurs did very well to get away with a point there a couple of weeks ago as, on the day they were the better team but we did well to scrape a point. Today though they really showed once again what a good team they are by beating the Arsenal. And not a la Stoke/Wolves blah blah blah they achieved it by playing good football. A good passing game. In fact they beat the Woolwich Wanderers at their own game and thoroughly need applauding. Of all the teams that were promoted last season I hope that they stay up and I think they will. They have a very good young coach/manager in Brendan Rodgers and some very good players. I've been really impressed with them this season. Good luck to 'em.
Well played Swansea, you showed more spirit and fight than our mob. Very disappointing. I didn't expect us to go there and win to be fair,I expected a draw at best. Once again well done Swansea. Now Arsene, get rid of that lazy SOB Arshavin, Rosicky can go as can Chamakh, Djourou, & Mertesacker. On the upside, it was nice to see Frimpong blowing kisses to the Tottering Hotscum fans.
Pingpong put himself about a bit on Saturday with some very rash challenges. Booked but carried on doing the same and was taken off before he got himself sent off. Got a lot to learn that boy. As for the rest of Woolwich Wanderers I think you'll agree that they need completely rebuilding. Wenger's more recent purchases over the past couple of years just haven't worked out and aren't up to scratch.
You mean like Vermaelen, and Oxlade-Chamberlain? As for Frimpong, he doesn't like spuds which is why he put himself about but needs to learn to do so in the right way. As for 'arrys squad, didn't exactly shine against Wolves at the weekend did they? When does his court case come up by the way?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Both notoriously “lovely” people to spend any time with or worse, serve 
    • No, just no.  Zero tolerance does not mean we expect zero crime but that we do not accept a standard level as normal and unavoidable. For those who have suffered such “minor” crimes, myself included having had my house broken into,  it is clear from the lack of action that they are considered “acceptable”’. Once small crimes become known to be ignored, it changes where and how we live.     
    • Lloyd Weber and Cilla Black were supposed to leave when Blair got in, but didn't
    • You can't have zero tolerance unless you live in a fascist/police state.  Sadly it is something you have to accept in a democracy.  There has always been crime, even in North Korea, the Soviet bloc, Nazi Germany, Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge etc.   The discussion point is how big a police force we need and capabilities, punishment, and building communities.  And how much we are prepared to pay in extra taxation. Even in the good (economic) times there is crime.  And crime under both Labour and Tory governments. I do not accept that phone thefts and parcel thefts are just statistics.  Police have to prioritise what they do, we might not agree with it.  And most criminals are multi-tasking, moving to where the best return is considering the risk of being caught. And there has to be a market, someone somewhere needs to buy a stolen product (I never buy off Gumtree). A starting point would be to decriminalise all illegal drugs, but that is definitely for a separate Lounge conversation, interesting discussion paper here: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/105520/1/A. Stevens - In defence of the decriminalisation of drug possession in the uk - PPDF.pdf Did you watch any of the series of Peaky Blinders?  This was a very popular series that glorified gang crime and violence.  Funny (ironic) that may enjoy films and TV that does this.  Although only the first series had any historical accuracy in it,  Criminal gangs were around before and ever since.    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...