Jump to content

Football Focus

jenniejenjen10

By jenniejenjen10
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Parkdrive

Parkdrive

Posted
Posted

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Really looking forward to those games actually.

> Four-nil though. That must have hurt.


At least were in it to get hurt, unlike your mob who aren't and have only been in it once. That must hurt.

ratty

ratty

Posted
Posted

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Err.. oh yes we have Parkdrive but it was called

> the European Cup then. You might not know that

> though because you're an Arsenal fan.

>

> Sorry ratty are we keeping you up?



You did send me off to be honest!


Pompey in court at 10:30 today! Never a dull moment!

Bluerevolution

Bluerevolution

Posted
Posted

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Two bald north Londoners arguing over a

> > comb.......or something ;-)

>

> Jah and Atila...separated at birth?

>

> http://theinspirationroom.com/daily/commercials/20

> 08/12/hamlet-photobooth.jpg


My wife is his agent and demands ?49,000 pounds for posting that image.

ratty

ratty

Posted
Posted

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yeah... very funny. Anyway, looks like Portsmouth

> have been shafted again and that's not funny at

> all. I feel for their fans.



On this occasion we are very happy to go into admin, not just because we were facing a winding up petition on Monday, but becaue we can now clear the toxic administrator Andronikou out of the club (Trevor Birchbwas appointed) and also, because the judge started to question the debenture of our previous "owner" Balram Chanrai. Our debt is tiny in footy terms (?4m) so this administration should be hugely beneficial to the club.


What has been going on in Pompey has been has been criminal and all down to Chanrai, who alleges he loaned ?17m to the club and uses this to be the main secured creditor, despite him having no evidence of the loan. This is the man that tried to pocket personally the money from the sale of Kaboul and who also failed to pay local charities money raised by the club on match days, presumably trouser ing this too.


So not so much of a sad day for us yesterday. Hopefully the start of something positive!

Otta

Otta

Posted
Posted

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> On a footballing front though, is 10 points not

> too little a punishment given it's the second time

> it has happened? I think it should be automatic

> relegation in the interests of those clubs who try

> to run their financial affairs properly.



Are you being serious here? All relegation would do, is punish the fans, and none of this is their fault.

ratty

ratty

Posted
Posted

The thing is, this administration has nothing to do with unsustainable borrowing. Like I said, you need to be armed with the full facts. The football league are, hence their decision to only deduct ten points. The judge was also, hence his decision to bar Urnst, Hacker, Young as being the Administrators.


We have the smallest squad in the championship. Don't really say how we can be said to have borrowed irresponsibly. Money has been stolen from the club, systematically by one man over three years. Hence, no funds.


Honestly, someone should write a book about the corruption that has gone on at Pompey in the last 2 years. Starting with the "owner" the club had that never existed, but who still mangaged to pass the FA's fit and proper person test.

Mick Mac

Mick Mac

Posted
Posted

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am serious. How many clubs have 'overachieved'

> with the help of unsustainable borrowing? Rangers

> for one and maybe Portsmouth too. Fans of other

> clubs get punished by being at a disadvantage when

> it comes to competing against the naughty

> borrowers.


Could not agree more. Rangers were effectively using the government's money to fund player acquisitions and salaries over the last ten years. Rangers fans then suggest if Celtic win the title this year it will be tarnished. Neil Lennon suggested they turn the spotlight on themselves.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Sue
      Nasty kids in Peckham Park

      By Sue · Posted

      They used to have dedicated park wardens, who I'm sure used to look after the parks and locked and opened the gates. Years ago I knew someone who was one. I thought they were based in that hut by the toilets. Are they not there any more? The community wardens are attached to the police rather than a specific park, aren't they?
    • rollflick
      Great news! Peckham Rye station to reclaim its public square by next year!

      By rollflick · Posted

      Yes, sad how Rye Lane has taken a dive, interesting to see those pics CPR Dave. It's shocking how the section between Choumert Road and the Nag's Head in particular has lost its vibrancy, meanwhile the next section to the top of Peckham Rye Common has gentrified. Wonder why such a distinction in fortunes? Anyway the station square plans have fallen behind yet again, demolition won't now start this summer. The only "work" that will now take place this summer is surveying of the arcade, which they've had 10 years since planning permission to do. At least the replacement TSB branch has progressed but the Blenheim Grove corner building still looks unfinished, despite claims it "is now complete". https://www.southwark.gov.uk/planning-environment-and-building-control/current-and-future-development/peckham-and-nunhead-2
    • FatherJack
      Dog Kennel Hill School to change name

      By FatherJack · Posted

      DKH was two form entry, it is now one form entry to cope with the fact it was far more under subscribed than other schools in the area. They had actually combined year groups into single classes, 3/4 and 5/6.  When a school changes name, it’s usually because of a bad reputation perhaps the results.  The new name is dry with no history unlike its current name. It’s a very sketchy decision. It’s an expensive vanity project for someone.  What  will happen if the name change does not increase applications to the school?     
    • teddyboy23
      The Chapel of Rest

      By teddyboy23 · Posted

      Hulk hogan 

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...