Jump to content

Football Focus

jenniejenjen10

By jenniejenjen10
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

Bluerevolution Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> RD did you get tickets for THE game?


I'm not holding my breath BR. Ticket applications only available to Executive and Season Ticket holders, and that closes at 08:00 BST on Tuesday 10 April. Bound to be oversubscribed and drawn by ballot. I can't see anyone who gets a ticket not wanting to go.

Jah Lush

Jah Lush

Posted
Posted

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Fat Lady is clearing her throat methinks


Definitely. I was at White Hart Lane on Saturday and I'm thinking/hoping we've returned to form and that the Arse are going to have a bit of a blip now. Still think Man Utd will win the title though. They have the experience that Man City don't.

Parkdrive

Parkdrive

Posted
Posted

Razors Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well done Chelsea. Should've had at least 4 more

> goals,some poor misses eg Ramires. Torres good but

> no cigar. Bring on Barca,we have nothing to fear.



Really? Poor deluded fool. Genuinely hope you get turned inside out, as your owner represents everything odious about the modern game.

maxxi

maxxi

Posted
Posted

I thought Chelsea were tired looking and pedestrian - I think they will get murdered by Barca but (weirdly) I hope they don't.*





*The writer is suffering from 'last English team in European cup syndrome' last brought on and evidenced by loud and supportive yelling on 26 May 1999 when surrounded by German businessmen in foreign bar.

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

I fancy this years winners will come from the Madrid v Munich semi, and if Munich get through the final will be a home game for them. If Barca do win it they'll be the first team to win back to back Champions Leagues.

Chelsea indeed looked very tired and pedestrian last night, infact I'm going to find out what the odds are on them losing to Barca, the FA Cup Semi and not qualifying for next years CL! :)

Undisputedtruth

Undisputedtruth

Posted
Posted

I hear you guys. I do agree Bayern Munich is a good side, but let's face it they haven't played a top quality side in the champions league yet, have they? So form means nothing. With Real on top of La Liga then I can't see BM beating them. Real have far too much firepower. Amazingly Real have scored 100 goals in thirty La Liga games while Barcelona have scored 86.


Real ftw.


ETA: apostrophe

Parkdrive

Parkdrive

Posted
Posted

Balotelli really should have walked after the tackle on Song!!! Disgraceful. I'm glad we won and put some daylight between us and Spuds, mind the gap!!!


City were out muscled, out thought, out played and out classed. All that money spent and they are imploding. It;s a toss up between City and Liverpool as to which club has wasted the most money in the transfer markets.

Alan Medic

Alan Medic

Posted
Posted

City are improving. Their points haul in the PL at the end of the season will show that. Not sure same can be said of Liverpool. Off the boil since they won the League cup and fortress Anfield is not what it was. I think City's downfall was Mancini's faith in Balotelli who is obviously not used to the concept of a team game. Liverpool's spending of ?35M on Carroll was too big a risk on an unproven player and seems in retrospect like a panic buy after getting so much for Torres. We've got it, lets spend it. King Kenny is not having the effect that was hoped for.

Why United persist with Welbeck I don't know. I never thought Andy Cole was a great footballer but he scored goals. Welbeck doesn't even do that. I will miss Berbi if he leaves the English game simply for his natural ability. Hard to believe he was top scorer last season and didn't get a look in this year.

Parkdrive

Parkdrive

Posted
Posted
The best thing about todays game, apart from the result, the 3 points , being above Spuds, again, was watching that nasty little mercenary being subbed off and being taunted with chants of "what a waste of money", still he did say he wanted to win trophies. Just won't be with City. Maybe he'll bugger off to PSG as they are now paying the big bucks.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • jazzer
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By jazzer · Posted

      Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • CPR Dave
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By CPR Dave · Posted

      The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • HeadNun
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By HeadNun · Posted

      Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
    • jazzer
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By jazzer · Posted

      Totally agree with you.  🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...