Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LOL failure to finish in the top 4 would be a real

> blow for Spurs. I kind of want to see Newcastle

> get it, because I'm loving their play this season,

> but would definitely rather Spurs than Chelsea!


I agree, there I've said it.

SJ wrote...



Something much bigger?...didn't have you down as a conspiracy theorist SJ :)

I'm sure Fergie will have a quiet word with him.


Re. Spurs' goal yesterday...had the referee given the penalty and sent Cech off, rather than playing advantage that led to the goal, it may have been a different outcome.



Don't understand why he couldn't have sent Cech off anyway. It was a sending off defence. Refs can go back and book players for foul play (it happened yesterday) after letting advantage go so why not here? Just because Spurs scored does not make it less of an offence.


Ashley Young's diving was pathetic and I'm glad to see Fergie has at least commented on it. He doesn't like it.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> Don't understand why he couldn't have sent Cech

> off anyway. It was a sending off defence. Refs can

> go back and book players for foul play (it

> happened yesterday) after letting advantage go so

> why not here? Just because Spurs scored does not

> make it less of an offence.


He could only send him off for violent conduct (it wasn't) or denying a clear goal-scoring opportunity (they scored so that is cancelled out too).

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Razors Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> ----

> > CFC v LFC final so lets hope LFC dont cheat

> like

> > they have done in champs league agnst CFC in

> past

> > with non existant goals etc!

>

>

> prophetic

. . . . . . . . . . . .

Was waiting for that! Thats why we had to put a few more past them to avoid the endless 'what ifs', and 'buts. .'

Read 'em and weep Harry. . . .er on second thoughts maybe just weep !

I agree Jah, and a lot of the credit should go to their chairman Dave Whelan...many others would've lost their nerve in January.

If 'arry does get the England job, Martinez along with Brendan Rogers should be a candidate for Spurs manager, but if I was a Spurs fan I would want Moyes. I think after 10 years he will leave Everton this summer. Without investment I don't think he can take Everton any further...he cut a very deflated figure after the semi-final.

Good point Tanday but if ever anyone has earned the right to try its Moyes. Its been a rollercoaster ride with 'Arry but without a smidgen of tactical nous applied when desperately needed hes been found out when it matters most. My beloved chickens have well and truly choked. Its the hope what gets you. ;-)

That's the thing with 'arry. He's obviously great with the players, but has he really got it tactically? After a recent loss, he said something along the lines of "people say we play well like that, but for me, it doesn't work so well".


So why did he play like that, because other people suggested it?!?

Tanday Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Would Moyes be able to deliver attacking football

> at Spurs though? He tends to set up his sides to

> stifle the opposition. That said, he doesnt have

> the same calibre of players to work with at

> Everton.


Great sides, these days, are able to stifle the opposition as well as producing fluid attacking football.


The problem with Moyes is that he hasn't got hardly any strikers. His latest forward acquisition from Rangers looks like a decent player though.


I think Moyes got the FA cup semi-final tactically right since Liverpool's srike force couldn't really score in a Wayne Rooney brothel. However, the mistakes by Everton gave the Livepool strkers the confidence to score goals that won the game.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The step means Love Dulwich is not disabled friendly though they went to help someone on  crutches up the step last time we were there  much prefer it as a Turkish than café but maybe not for this group   The noise level might be an issue as it’s all hard surfaces though I don’t recall it being noisy. check out Olivelli the menu has a good range  though it’s not the best Italian you can get. There’s also a step up into Maria’s - much smaller but you need to negotiate the step and door at the same time. Olivelli has more room and if I remember right the toilets are on the ground floor. A consideration if steps are an issue The Lordship might be an option. Noise is not usually an issue. We’ve enjoyed various meals there. The ladies toilets are on the same floor as the tables (the gents may be upstairs). The staff are always friendly
    • It’s about chains, and the ethos of family run business versus unhealthy competition 
    • 'Tom Lehrer, acclaimed musical satirist of cold war era, dies aged 97' https://www.theguardian.com/music/2025/jul/28/tom-lehrer-dies-aged-97-dead-musical-satirist  
    • But all those examples sell a wide variety of things,  and mostly they are well spread out along Lordship Lane. These two shops both sell one very specific thing, albeit in different flavours, and are just across the road from each other. I don't think you can compare the distribution of shops in Roman times to the distribution of shops in Lordship Lane in the twenty first century. Well, you can, but it doesn't feel very appropriate. Haa anybody asked the first shop how they feel? Are they happy about the "healthy competition" ?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...