Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The queen never went woodrot - football used to be a working class game,


Mmm - the final... I marginally wanted Liverpool to win but the significant and growing part of their bleatingly, self pitying, siege mentality fans has made me less enamoured with a club I used to think ok. I noticed a Livepool fan has taken me off their Facebook friends for just saying they should move on from the Suarez incxident *waves at old Facebook friend from EDF


They won't half go on about the 'goal' that was disallowed - did anyone one else think Carrol would have scored if he's followed through rather than gone off celebrating?


Anyway, bunch of tossers lifted the Cup.

Can anyone explain why apparently a large section of the Liverpool fans booed the national anthem?


I heard radio broadcasters mentioning it last night and seemingly connecting it to the lack of respect Chelsea fans showed during a minutes silence on the anniversary of the Hillsbrough tragedy.

I've looked on the various supporters boards, but there doesn't seem to be a 'rational' reason for this - any more than there is any single reason for the riots last summer.


Most of the enthusiasts who think this was clever and inspired think so for different reasons. Some are going on about Hillsborough, some about response to what they see as an attack on Liverpool for being supported by racist bigots, some about regional identity and the north/south divide.


Liverpool fans have generally been disrespectful to the national anthem, but it doesn't usually escalate to booing, normally to singing 'You'll Never Walk Alone' loudly over the top.


It seems to me that this season Liverpool fans have really accellerated this bizarre sense of injustice they like to suffer from. This wankish stroppy sulky teenager response that blames everyone else for their own misbehaviour.


This is just the latest incarnation of it. Pathetic.


They always seem so surprised when people describe them as witless morons.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The queen never went woodrot - football used to be

> a working class game,

>



"Standing for the queen" is a fairly well known term for standing for the national anthem & does not signify the actual presence of the queen

I missed the first 10 minutes, so missed the National Anthem. Booing it does seem rather odd, but there you go.


For q cup final, it was a pretty decent match. Obviously gutted about the result, and think Quids may be right about Carroll's chance to follow up and finish that goal off. Did think he did well once he came on though, and wish he'd started. Chelsea did well at keeping Suarez very quiet.

So games...rather important week for the red n blue inmates of that post indstrial North West shithole has hasnt improved much since Engels wrote about it in less than approving style, about 150 yeas ago.


Both the mighty Toon and the troglodyte mud men mackem vermin can make or break hearts on the other side of the pennines in the next few days


predictions please

I thought Liverpool were pretty awful for most of the match. Carroll made a big difference but before that I thought most of the Liverpool players were not up to the standard of a club with so much expectation. I don't know if they were having off days all at once but particularly Henderson and Downing were very poor. Gerrard seemed to have no influence but maybe it was because of what he was surrounded by.


On another subject just heard a football journalist talking about Arsenal's end to the season. He said that their fans were so busy laughing at Spurs and saying 'mind the gap' that it looks like they've just fallen in it themselves. It sounded funny when hearing it.

Bluerevolution Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/sport/

> football/manchester_city/s/1492849_comment-manches

> ter-city-buying-glory-now-thats-rich


How many times are you going to post that BL? If City win the league it will be because they have got the best players regardless of the cost of them. Mancini's u-turn on Tevez may be the deciding factor. If United do it will be a minor miracle given how poor we have been most of the season.


What would be fun would be if City won by a goal today and United won by 7 or 8.


Last time City won the league it was clinched at Newcastle with a 4-3 win. Hope that's not the case today.

Kenny Dalglish has come in for a lot of criticism this season, a lot of which has been deserved. However, credit where it's due, he didn't try to moan about the goal that wasn't and held his hands up.


"I thought it went in but if it hasn't then

give the officials the credit they deserve,"


"We've just got to learn our lessons from it

and understand we can't start the game

like that."

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...