Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Fergies become increasingly less flammable over the years so its always nice to see him do his rabid & ruddy ref denunciation(That was well alliterative). Funny as feck. We rode our luck somewhat in the 2nd half but given our appalling lack of fortune up there usually I thought that was fair enough. Good to see yet another Sun journalist get shown up for the shit stirring tit he was. Stand up Paul Jiggins and his one man mission to upset the AVB applecart.


http://harry-hotspur.com/2012/09/busted-paul-jiggins-of-the-sun/

There might not have been any dodgy refereeing decision agianst Spurs, but there was against Utd i.e the clear foul on Nani...still, we'll move on and not keep griping on about it in years to come ;-)


Fergie actually had a relevant point about taking the role of working out added time-on from the referee, like they do in rugby - from The Guardian...


Sir Alex Ferguson complained that not enough injury time was played at the end of Manchester United's 3-2 defeat to Tottenham at Old Trafford on Saturday, and amid the predictable guffawing about "Fergie time," he was right. Roughly, 30 seconds were lost for each United goal, a minute for the Spurs goal, a minute for the Rooney free-kick that hit the post and two minutes for substitutions. So, close to five minutes total, in a game that last only 94min 28sec ? and that's without factoring in the time-wasting that went on every time the ball went out of play for a Spurs restart.

bon3yard Wrote:


. Good to see yet another Sun

> journalist get shown up for the shit stirring tit

> he was. Stand up Paul Jiggins and his one man

> mission to upset the AVB applecart.

>

> http://harry-hotspur.com/2012/09/busted-paul-jiggi

> ns-of-the-sun/


Don't buy The Sun.


@Red Devil - hurts doesn't it.

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ladygooner Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Wow great game at Old Trafford - well done

> Spurs.

> > Wish we had done so well today.........

>

> Yes indeed LadyG, I agree.Well done Spuds.


Oui! Well done spurs.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Go by train, go by car, have a laugh at QPR



Good to see Jarvis start - be even better when Carroll does too.


8 yellows though, Clattenburg went a bit bonkers.


Can't see Sparky surviving this one.


*waves goodbye and spots Harry Rednapp lurking in shadows under the stands...

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What made it so good was that The Wanderers lost

> at home too. Still, Gervino finally found the net

> for them but I think Olivier Giroud is another one

> to look out for. He's an amazingly versatile

> player, he can miss from anywhere with either foot

> or even his head.


Like Bent used to when he played for 'Arry. ;)

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Can't see Sparky surviving this one.

>

> *waves goodbye and spots Harry Rednapp lurking in

> shadows under the stands...


He's been given the Chairman's vote of confidence...what shall we say, end of the week?

Indeed! Look at his record. If he's not sacked he jumps ship. I think he'll be found wanting and in the final analysis will be proved that he's not as good as he thinks he is. Unless things improve drastically he'll be gone by the end of the month one way or another.

Rangers have an equally tricky statistic to get rid of as they have yet to win away from home in the Scottish Third Division. That one could also run for a while.


Annan Athletic's home form looks a bit suspect, so you may have a chance there. Are they amateur or semi professional?


( ;-) - for PGC only)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...