Jump to content

Recommended Posts

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I'm predictint that 5 will be way bove avergae

> on

> > the poredictions league this week :)

>

> Average score 3.7, table out tomorrow.

> How's your neck? :)


So opting out of a week now becomes a tactic!

This weeks makers and shakers...


AM - 1 Correct Result + 2 Correct Scores = 7 pts

RD - 4 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 7 pts


LG - 5 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 5 pts

RC - 2 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 5 pts

SC - 2 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 5 pts


?? - 4 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 4 pts


DR - 3 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 3 pts

OT - 0 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 3 pts


EP - 2 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 2 pts

JL - 2 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 2 pts

MM - 2 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 2 pts

Mx - 2 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 2 pts

PD - 2 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 2 pts


*NEW RULE: At the end of the season, if two teams are tied on the same number of points, the team that has played the most games will finish higher. If both teams have played the same number of games, then it will be a tie...

AM putting in a nice bit of effort there for the Fair Play award.



red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thanks Meds, I had QPR losing to Saints 1-2 in my

> head, not 1-3.

>

> AM - 2 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 5

> points

>

> Table amended, no change in positions...

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thank God for the pool, I'd have scored 0 if

> they'd los / drawn.



I think there is some pretty stiff competition for the first to score 0 points legitimately (i.e. without making deliberately silly 10-0 predictions) - The Mis?re trophy is at stake.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This latest table incorporates average scores

> (shown in red) for players that miss a week.

> It also includes a minimum participation rule. I'm

> going to set the bar higher than ???? suggested

> 50%, and make it 75%.

> This hopefuly will encourage players to

> participate rather than rely on getting an average

> score.

> Anyone with less than 75% (shown in indigo)

> wouldn't qualify for CL and final table

> consideration...


If my maths are correct any lurkers wishing to play would have to start this week or they will never reach the 75% participation rule.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If my maths are correct any lurkers wishing to

> play would have to start this week or they will

> never reach the 75% participation rule.


Might already have gone, 12 games played out of 38. Plus some weeks there will be more than one game played e.g. Xmas and Easter...

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seeing stories linking Rafa with DiMateo's job at

> Chelsea. That would be a turn up.


I can understand the logic of sacking RDM if Guardiloa is prepared to take the job now, but not Benitez, unless they think he will get the best out of Torres a la Liverpool form...

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Genuinely shocked by DiMateo's departure. Just

> shows how fickle Abramovich is.



Ruthless more like. To have delivered the trophies Ancelotti and Di Matteo had delivered at any other club you'd have thought their job was secure. Not at Chelski. What a horrible club that is.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • “What do councils spend all the money on?” Is, in my view, one of the most profoundly emblematic of our times  we go about our lives, backed up by councils and governments and complain they aren’t needed  reform win elections based on “we’re gonna go in and slash all the waste!” Only to later admit there effectively isn’t any oh and by the way we need to increase council tax   Now all we have to offer is racism and ineptitude sorry about that  https://www.gbnews.com/money/reform-elon-musk-doge-failed-savings So where does the money go? On a multitude of services - but the increasingly aged population and the care provision required is a large part of it  the government could give councils more money to avoid council tax rises  - but the we would have to pay more in jewels taxation  and as a country we tend to pay less than other similar countries  so we end up with an expensive mend and make do approach  I don’t see any political parties offering a solution   Starmer is obviously lacking in many areas but he is the result of a hostile media and a reluctant population willing to hear truths  (wait until we hear how much we will need to increase defence spending by in the coming years) If a party stopped pretending all the money was wasted but published a list of costs, projections and proposals that wasn’t gutted to suit the landscape of needing to not bemonstered by the press or deemed too expensive by voters I would be very interested      can’t see that happening tho  (also worth reminding ourselves of all the brexiters who said things like “I don’t care how much it costs   I don’t care if I lose my job  it’s about taking back control!” And yet now we find them complaining about increasing costs. As they always will complain about everything  because it’s always someone else’s fault)   
    • I wouldn't be going all the way to Dobbies  just to take flowerpots! 😀 It's a very good garden centre with a wide range of well kept  plants and helpful staff, at least it was on the only occasion I've visited it, last year!
    • Why do Councils need more funding? What are they spending our money on, how efficiently are they running? are they performing an adequate service as is? Are they viewing the public with contempt, that we will continually foot larger bills to cover all and any costs? Do our counsellors do their best, for us? why are they adding this on to the residents, on top of tax already paid? Council tax is not insubstantial. The service provided is not great. I do not believe they use our money effectively.  Our CT Bill is £50 a week.  
    • Jesse Jackson, US civil rights activist, 84
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...