Jump to content

Recommended Posts

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I'm predictint that 5 will be way bove avergae

> on

> > the poredictions league this week :)

>

> Average score 3.7, table out tomorrow.

> How's your neck? :)


So opting out of a week now becomes a tactic!

This weeks makers and shakers...


AM - 1 Correct Result + 2 Correct Scores = 7 pts

RD - 4 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 7 pts


LG - 5 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 5 pts

RC - 2 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 5 pts

SC - 2 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 5 pts


?? - 4 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 4 pts


DR - 3 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 3 pts

OT - 0 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 3 pts


EP - 2 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 2 pts

JL - 2 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 2 pts

MM - 2 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 2 pts

Mx - 2 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 2 pts

PD - 2 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 2 pts


*NEW RULE: At the end of the season, if two teams are tied on the same number of points, the team that has played the most games will finish higher. If both teams have played the same number of games, then it will be a tie...

AM putting in a nice bit of effort there for the Fair Play award.



red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thanks Meds, I had QPR losing to Saints 1-2 in my

> head, not 1-3.

>

> AM - 2 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 5

> points

>

> Table amended, no change in positions...

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thank God for the pool, I'd have scored 0 if

> they'd los / drawn.



I think there is some pretty stiff competition for the first to score 0 points legitimately (i.e. without making deliberately silly 10-0 predictions) - The Mis?re trophy is at stake.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This latest table incorporates average scores

> (shown in red) for players that miss a week.

> It also includes a minimum participation rule. I'm

> going to set the bar higher than ???? suggested

> 50%, and make it 75%.

> This hopefuly will encourage players to

> participate rather than rely on getting an average

> score.

> Anyone with less than 75% (shown in indigo)

> wouldn't qualify for CL and final table

> consideration...


If my maths are correct any lurkers wishing to play would have to start this week or they will never reach the 75% participation rule.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If my maths are correct any lurkers wishing to

> play would have to start this week or they will

> never reach the 75% participation rule.


Might already have gone, 12 games played out of 38. Plus some weeks there will be more than one game played e.g. Xmas and Easter...

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seeing stories linking Rafa with DiMateo's job at

> Chelsea. That would be a turn up.


I can understand the logic of sacking RDM if Guardiloa is prepared to take the job now, but not Benitez, unless they think he will get the best out of Torres a la Liverpool form...

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Genuinely shocked by DiMateo's departure. Just

> shows how fickle Abramovich is.



Ruthless more like. To have delivered the trophies Ancelotti and Di Matteo had delivered at any other club you'd have thought their job was secure. Not at Chelski. What a horrible club that is.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I completely agree with you . Its as if they have their foot in the door and are just pushing and pushing. It's ridiculous. It's not the right space. they clearly do not give any regard to the environment or they would move it.  
    • There's a great badminton club at the Harris girls academy. It runs Friday from 5.30 to 6.45. for more experienced players, they have sessions on Wednesday and Friday, too but that's subject to skill levels 
    • There seem to be all sorts of blocks for this event being mounted on the Common, one is that it was 'designed especially' for the current site, though the organisers seem to have had absolutely no problem rejigging their plans to the original site footprint to expand the event to what we had last year- which I think really imposed on a large part of the park and spoilt the feel. I would suggest pressing very hard for relocation to the Common ( also closer to transport links). There must be a way, surely? If not, then wholesale relocation to a more suitable venue. I just do not think the park should be subjected to a festival-goer footfall of 60,000 plus over the summer.
    • I absolutely will. Fed up of property developments that are funded from offshore investors and price out local people. Fed up of the demise of social rents and the growing crisis of families in bed and breakfast. Fed up of young people being unable to save deposits, start families and generally have the same security of tenure that previous generations had. So yes, I will drill down into the financing, affordability, where the properties aer being advertised for sale, and how many are genuinely for social rent. Otherwise, no opposition to redeveloping that site in that way. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...