Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-22541130

>

> Average attendancies.

>

> West Ham up by around 4k from last season.


I would believe those figures if they were for tickets sold (inc season tickets), but for actual attendances, nah...

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-22541130

>

> Average attendancies.

>

> West Ham up by around 4k from last season.


That'll be the kids for a quid thing. Its a great idea, however the parents will be paying long term due to chronic neck problems.

top work RD, thanks.


you know I've been thinking about trying out aome django development (there's lots of jobs in ireland for it), and these guys would host an app for free

https://www.openshift.com/developers/pricing


If I've got some spare time I might write a little web app to take the hard work out of it next season, just a thought

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> top work RD, thanks.

>

> you know I've been thinking about trying out aome

> django development (there's lots of jobs in

> ireland for it), and these guys would host an app

> for free

> https://www.openshift.com/developers/pricing

>

> If I've got some spare time I might write a little

> web app to take the hard work out of it next

> season, just a thought



Thanks Jah, Mick & EP.


Go for it EP. I was thinking earlier that it would be good if there was a more user friendly way of storing and presenting the weekly forecasts, results and table, rather than having to trawl back through pages and pages...

maybe a maxxi should be the lowest score of the week, just to keep them in touch.

You need something else there's no incentive to join late or to carry on if you miss a week through illness or holiday.


If I do the webapp maybe I'll post randomly generated (from 0-2) scores thirty minutes before kick off if no scores have been entered.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Second in this

> First in the Rugby

>

>

> ...I'm an all-rounder in the Denis Compton mold

> rather than a specialist like RD :)

>

> Congrats and thanks for all your work on this RD


Cheers ????.

I was second in the rugby, do you think we should retire to give the others a chance? :)...

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> maxxi Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Have pm'd my CL prediction.

> >

> > Agree about losing the maxxi - a poor week when

> > you only get a point or two should not be

> rubbed

> > in by those on the missing list getting more.

>

> What, another one?



Now, now, if you recall I withdrew the "whatever-is-the-opposite-of-yours" prediction and agreed I would play nice and by RD's rules.


You know who I'm bound to go for anyway (no mind games... honest) B)


Oh, and RD? Retire? To spend more time concentrating on the EDF Fantasy Premier League you mean? If I look down I can just about see you.

As per FA Cup Final...


- If both players predict the correct result and correct score i.e 3pts, then the nearest prediction for the first goal scored wins. If by a miracle you both predict the same time, then it's decided by a toss of the coin.


- If both players predict the correct score only i.e 1pt, then closest to the actual score wins. If this is equal then the nearest prediction to the time of the first goal scored applies, and so on.


I think that covers all eventualities.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ok maxxi, though I don't remember any retraction.

> Now RD, what are the rules for the Final if you

> don't mind my asking given our entries could be

> the same?



maxxi wrote on May 04 - "But to save your blood pressure and knowing that otherwise you may suspect chicanery I will make whatever kind of prediction you think is 'correct', a 'by-the-book' prediction and pm it to Rd(if that's the way you think it should be done), okay?"


I never said I would do it there and then (I didn't and, until today, hadn't) and have not stated since that I had, had had, or had had had done it since then - until today.


Alles klaar mein freund!? Gut! Und das beste von britischen Gl?ck f?r Sie!


"Ein andere bier bitte! Nein nicht bitter bitte, lagerbier bitte! LLL!*... (und so weiter und so weiter und so weiter)"


*Lache laut los (trans: LOL)

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Looks like we've got Carroll, subject to him

> signing



But that doesn't appear to be a formality. Can't think why not - Newcastle don't want him back so who else is there? I hope he signs. He may be a big/physical player but he has some skills too - unlike whoever BFS would get as a replacement.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...