Jump to content

Football Focus

jenniejenjen10

By jenniejenjen10
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Alan Medic

Alan Medic

Posted
Posted

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I'm predictint that 5 will be way bove avergae

> on

> > the poredictions league this week :)

>

> Average score 3.7, table out tomorrow.

> How's your neck? :)


So opting out of a week now becomes a tactic!

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

This weeks makers and shakers...


AM - 1 Correct Result + 2 Correct Scores = 7 pts

RD - 4 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 7 pts


LG - 5 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 5 pts

RC - 2 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 5 pts

SC - 2 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 5 pts


?? - 4 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 4 pts


DR - 3 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 3 pts

OT - 0 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 3 pts


EP - 2 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 2 pts

JL - 2 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 2 pts

MM - 2 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 2 pts

Mx - 2 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 2 pts

PD - 2 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 2 pts


*NEW RULE: At the end of the season, if two teams are tied on the same number of points, the team that has played the most games will finish higher. If both teams have played the same number of games, then it will be a tie...

Help-Ma-Boab

Help-Ma-Boab

Posted
Posted

AM putting in a nice bit of effort there for the Fair Play award.



red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thanks Meds, I had QPR losing to Saints 1-2 in my

> head, not 1-3.

>

> AM - 2 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 5

> points

>

> Table amended, no change in positions...

maxxi

maxxi

Posted
Posted

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thank God for the pool, I'd have scored 0 if

> they'd los / drawn.



I think there is some pretty stiff competition for the first to score 0 points legitimately (i.e. without making deliberately silly 10-0 predictions) - The Mis?re trophy is at stake.

Alan Medic

Alan Medic

Posted
Posted

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This latest table incorporates average scores

> (shown in red) for players that miss a week.

> It also includes a minimum participation rule. I'm

> going to set the bar higher than ???? suggested

> 50%, and make it 75%.

> This hopefuly will encourage players to

> participate rather than rely on getting an average

> score.

> Anyone with less than 75% (shown in indigo)

> wouldn't qualify for CL and final table

> consideration...


If my maths are correct any lurkers wishing to play would have to start this week or they will never reach the 75% participation rule.

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If my maths are correct any lurkers wishing to

> play would have to start this week or they will

> never reach the 75% participation rule.


Might already have gone, 12 games played out of 38. Plus some weeks there will be more than one game played e.g. Xmas and Easter...

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seeing stories linking Rafa with DiMateo's job at

> Chelsea. That would be a turn up.


I can understand the logic of sacking RDM if Guardiloa is prepared to take the job now, but not Benitez, unless they think he will get the best out of Torres a la Liverpool form...

Jah Lush

Jah Lush

Posted
Posted

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Genuinely shocked by DiMateo's departure. Just

> shows how fickle Abramovich is.



Ruthless more like. To have delivered the trophies Ancelotti and Di Matteo had delivered at any other club you'd have thought their job was secure. Not at Chelski. What a horrible club that is.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • beansprout
      Medivet Lordship Lane flooded

      By beansprout · Posted

      Going to be really inconvenient for folk to go that way as has been stated.. why not just move to Camberwell which I would assume is abit nearer and better travelling wise or have vets in both places from Lordship Lane Branch.. Must have been massive flood if going to take two months to dry out, electrical tests to make sure all good… From upstairs? Or where?
    • NewWave
      Medivet Lordship Lane flooded

      By NewWave · Posted

      @selector73 Thanks!  Because we want him to be treated by the vets that know him we will have to get to the New X branch because thats where the team are based until LL reopens. Thank you again 🙏
    • selector73
      Medivet Lordship Lane flooded

      By selector73 · Posted

      There's 1 in camberwell hope that helps
    • NewWave
      Medivet Lordship Lane flooded

      By NewWave · Posted

      Thank you !  We Will find a way to get him to New X because We owe his life to the vets he sees at Lordship Lane branch and they know him (and us) and we prefer the continuity of care because he's an elderly rescue cat who gets extremely anxious even though he's been needing monthly bloods he just never gets used to going and it can be a lengthy process just getting the sample. Can you tell I'm as anxious about the whole thing as he is??😥

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...