Jump to content

JCWI petition for an Independent Commission into the policies and practices of the Home Office, ...


Recommended Posts

JCWI has started a petition calling for an Independent Commission into the policies and practices of the Home Office, and the ?hostile environment?.


Please do sign and share with your networks: https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/219003



Petition text:


'An Independent Commission into the Home Office and the "hostile environment"


The Windrush Scandal and Amber Rudd?s resignation have shown the chaotic and cruel way the Home Office operates.


This crisis was caused by Theresa May?s ?hostile environment? policy. The policy ruins lives, puts people at risk of destitution and removal, and increases the risk of modern slavery.


It asks landlords and doctors to act as border guards and there is no evidence that the policy works.


Migrants and those who look or sound 'foreign' are at most risk.


We can no longer trust that the Home Office can function effectively and fairly.


We need an Independent Commission to look into the behaviour of the Home Office and its ?hostile environment?. It is the only way to ensure that all those caught up in Theresa May?s ?hostile environment? are protected.'

Have to say this petition seems misguided to me. It looks like a badly thought-out campaign using the Windrush issue as a lever in a somewhat spurious way to destabilise the Conservative government. Doesn't feel right to me.

This is not a new or novel issue with the Home Office and immigration/asylum cases - as a practitioner in the field and a monitor of the quality of decision-making for UNHCR I spent my career dealing with poor decision-making, incompetence, toxic attitudes and misinformation.


The problem is not restricted to Windrush cases, but spreads across Commonwealth cases, EU nationals resident in the UK etc. and that is just looking at issues arising over the last year. The Windrush cases date back years - https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/may/10/its-destroyed-my-life-windrush-victim-recognised-as-legal-citizen-after-13-years.


The 'Hostile Environment' created by May as Home Secretary was merely an extension of a well-established culture of disbelief and cynicism prevalent within the UKBA and its forebears. Both the Labour Government and the Tory Government treated immigrants and asylum seekers abysmally.


The system is flawed - transparency, a change of deep-seated culture and attitudes, training and oversight would go a long way to making our immigration system fairer and well-run. See further: https://migrantsrights.org.uk/blog/2018/04/24/senior-judge-calls-uk-immigration-rules-a-disgrace/?mc_cid=5ef9a58908&mc_eid=c6ca3ef600


The JCWI petition is not an attempt to destabilise the Tory Government; they are doing a great job of doing that themselves with infighting over Brexit.


If you disagree with the petition, don't sign it. If you would like something constructive done, please do sign and share it widely.

IlonaM Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> If you disagree with the petition, don't sign it.

> If you would like something constructive done,

> please do sign and share it widely.


That's rather a binary attitude, Ilona. You've chosen to post this on a public forum so I think it's fine for people to discuss both the issue and the petition.


You post a lot of petitions here so clearly you're passionate about things. Just my opinion but you'll get further with them if you don't push away the negative reactions.

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Have to say this petition seems misguided to me.

> It looks like a badly thought-out campaign using

> the Windrush issue as a lever in a somewhat

> spurious way to destabilise the Conservative

> government. Doesn't feel right to me.


Can they be more unstable ?

if - as now generally accepted in the sunny daylight of the post Brexit referendum landscape - the UKG is a delivery method for the will of the people, then surely UKG Home Office actions are a derivate of the peoples will.

flocker spotter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> if - as now generally accepted in the sunny

> daylight of the post Brexit referendum landscape

> - the UKG is a delivery method for the will of the

> people, then surely UKG Home Office actions are a

> derivate of the peoples will.


There's an ethics issue at some point though (wherever the line gets drawn) - Many evil policies in other countries histories were the will of that countries people but the culprits still get punished eventually and "will of the people" is no defence.


This UN expert says we may have passed that line.


https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/theresa-mays-hostile-environment-is-destroying-the-lives-of-ethnic-minority-britons-warns-un-expert_uk_5af57ca9e4b00d7e4c19b881

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • was the price not displayed on the menu?
    • It has come to this author’s attention that the world of 4+ admissions — that most enigmatic of educational rites — continues to bewilder even the most composed of parents. Fear not. For in a former life, I was not merely a humble observer, but a seasoned educator of over twenty years, and Head of Pre-Prep for a distinguished dozen. Now, with quill exchanged for touchscreen, I have taken to that most modern of salons — Instagram — to dispense guidance, answer frequently whispered questions, and illuminate the shadowy corners of school selection with clarity and calm. Each post bears my signature twist: a blend of insight, levity, and the occasional raised eyebrow. Should you find yourself adrift in the sea of admissions, I suggest you peruse my latest dispatch. It may well be the lifeline you seek. The Delicate Dilemma of the Summer-born 4+ Scholars Yours in solidarity and scholastic savvy, Lord Pencilton  🎩✏️
    • Perhaps Gooseygreeny was not familiar with the wildlife before Gala was imposed on the park, since when its value to wildlife has deteriorated. The Park had never been disturbed before, as the council had respected it as a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation, so only the Common was licensed by them as a site for events. The first time Gala held their event, there was a tree with woodpeckers nesting in it right in the middle of the main field they used and thrushes, blackbirds and great tits nesting within the shrubs and trees immediately surrounding the field. The woodpeckers were thriving on ants from the anthills in the grass. To those of us who used to enjoy watching the wildlife, it was very obviously a Site of Importance for a variety of birds. Despite being accessed by the public and their dogs, it had been relatively undisturbed,  which was one of the main reasons why it was so special and why I have been opposed to the Gala festival being held during the bird nesting season.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...