Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Looks like you bottoming stuff out I was watching X Factor and modestly drinking which was remarkably good considering I'm cynical and the economic system didn't actually collapse during it so I will regard it as money in the Bank of Life. Now where can I package that and sell it on and by so doing increase the happiness a hundred fold.


Nexus - not bad considering internet wisdom is not to feed the trolls - consider yourself sated.

LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No, I agree, but combined with impending economic

> and ecological collapse, I think it's all going

> tits up soon! I just hope it's not in the next 2

> years because I have things I want to do!


Yeah you'll be all right frog boiling thingy.

ibilly99 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LadyDeliah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > No, I agree, but combined with impending

> economic

> > and ecological collapse, I think it's all going

> > tits up soon! I just hope it's not in the next

> 2

> > years because I have things I want to do!

>

> Yeah you'll be all right frog boiling thingy.



Are you sure you were only modestly drinking?

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "So let me get this clear, you don't like

> fractional reserve banking?

>

> "No I don?t like fraud and corruption, that passes

> itself off as banking."

>

> Fractional reserve banking is not inherently

> corrupt or fraudulent. It's necessary to allow

> society to invest in activity now that will creat

> a future return. That's how you build a factory

> before it manufactures anything.

>

> As a result it doesn't hold the reserves for the

> currency it transacts - it's simply owed that cash

> by other people. This is a casual assumption that

> we make about the banking environment, and

> enables, for example, small business loans.

>

> It's possible to argue that there have been too

> many loans made recently that are unlikely to be

> repaid, but this is a subjective perspective. Any

> loan is a risk.

>

> It doesn't make it corrupt or fraudulent by

> definition.



The banking regulations that are on the books, are not being enforced, why, all US presidents funded by banks, quid pro quo perhaps.


US banking system is Fraud.

Frankito Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Such sweeping statements, oh omnipotent one... I

> praise you. Nexus, are you interested in any

> threads other than this one? I am dying to know

> your take on foie gras..


Take a look in the Drawing room

Right. I've just read ten pages of this bollix.

What was the point again?


Correct me if I'm wrong but the pink and crouton corner think that we are within a crusty shout of the world as we know it changing. I'm with them. When I grew up the two Ronniess had twenty million viewers every week and the worm that turned was a serious treatise on feminism. Now my 19 months old child looks scathingly on any technology that isn't touchscreeny.


The ecrue and burgundy corner think that there will be muddling through. I'm with them, when I grew up everything ws shit, and now everything is shit because everything is good, but now that everything is good everything is obviously shit, you know... Because .... Mor summink.


Forgive me, ten pages of this shit.


Those that use poor history are as bad as the bad science brigade. Coincidence to be causality, anecdote to be trend. Or ultimately, I've a hypothesis, here's some stuff to prove it; bugger the morass of everything else; rather than here's the whole complex world how does it fit together.


Oh, and when someone doesn't answer a question but posts an oblique link in reply then discount them, they are incapable of original thought or a decent opinion, what they are doing is looking into the middle distance, furrowing brow and hoping that their handsomeness is enough.


What they really mean is:

My argument boils down to this "I think things might go a bit wrong in the future"


Errrr..... That's it.

I've no issue with economics, though it's a bit dull. I do have an issue with bad history.

I seem to have something in common with a couple of other posters, history backgroundwise, and it may be down to us to ensure that the EDF doesn't invade Abyssinia.

Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.


There is however a good novel by an Italian collective called "Luther Blisset" which deals with the early days of Protestantism, particularly the more revolutionary anabaptist elements, which is well worth a read.

It's the DNA of that time that we still see strong in NN and co. It is more prevalent in the US for the obvious reason that the place was practically born of those strands, but it is lively everywhere now.


No god to fight against and the church is neutered, so let's rail against "them" whomsoever they may be. So much easier than blaming yourself for your inadequacy eh.


And no SJ, I'm still not taking about you you weirdo.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> Talk about rewriting history. The Italian

> collective you talk about was AC Milan and Luther

> Blisset was a Watford footballer they bought by

> mistake supposedly.They meant to buy John Barnes

> the story goes. Was he a Protestant?


so wroing lol

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ibilly99 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > getting to the point quickly 2 cans of beer one

> > g&t

>

> And a Jeeves...?


Nah - saving that for special occasions such as when the financial oligarchy finally falls (sell by date is Sep 2012 so they had better hurry up.)

For all the posting sheep that bleep Bar, Bar, ?conspiracy theory?


When Winston Churchill told the house, Germany is re-arming, and readying itself for war, the shouts from the benches was, sit-down, and war-monger.

Just because you do not like something does not make it a ?conspiracy theory?


Theories are theories until they become facts.

Sorry people, the world is round.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprise, surprise. It didn't take them long, did it. This will be something of a test as to how much the council really care about parks and the environment. A footfall of 60,000. Are they mad? There is no way this park is designed for or can sustain that sort of use.
    • There was another unprovoked attack on Monday this week on a young woman nearby (Anstey Road) at 6.45pm. Don't have any other details, it was posted on a Facebook group by her flatmate. Pretty worrying  https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EGfDrCAST/
    • OMFG is it possible for the council to do anything without a bunch of armchair experts moaning about it? The library refurb is great news, as it's lovely but completely shagged out - the toilets don't even work reliably. Other libraries in the area will be open longer house during the closure. July is a rubbish time to begin a refurb because it's just before the entire construction sector goes on summer holiday, and it would mean delaying the work another 8 months.
    • Licensing application for 2026 has gone in and they want to extend the event from 4 to 7 days accross two weekends.  There are some proposed significant changes to be aware of:   Event proposal moves to two separate weekends Number of days of the festival moves from 4 to 7 meaning also a change in the original licence is required Expected footfall in the park over the two weekends around 60,000.    Dear Peckham Rye Park Stakeholder,   Re: STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION – event application: ‘GALA and On The Rye Festival 2026’ – ref: SWKEVE000935   We are writing to you because you have previously identified yourself as someone who wishes to be informed about event applications for Peckham Rye Park, or we think that you might have an interest in knowing about this particular event application.   Please be aware that the council are in receipt of an event application for: GALA and On The Rye Festival 2026’   In line with the council’s Outdoor Events Policy and events application process we are carrying out consultation regarding this application.   The following reference documents are attached to this email:   Consultation information APPENDIX A – site plan weekend 1 APPENDIX B – site plan weekend 2 APPENDIX C – Production Schedule APPENDIX D – 2025 Noise Management Plan   The consultation is open from Tuesday 4 November and will close at midnight on Tuesday 2 December 2025   Community engagement sessions will take place on Wednesday 19 November.   If you would like to comment on application: SWKEVE000935 and take part in the online consultation, please visit:   www.southwark.gov.uk/GALA2026   If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact us.     Kind Regards, Southwark Events Team Environment and Leisure PO Box 64529 London SE1P 5LX 020 7525 3639 @SouthwarkEvents APPENDIX A - SITE PLAN weekend 1.pdf APPENDIX B - SITE PLAN weekend 2.pdf APPENDIX C - PRODUCTION SCHEDULE.pdf And just to add that councillor Renata Hamvas chairs the licensing committee. Worth contacting her with views on ammendments to the original license. I am fairly sure she won't grant any amendments, but just in case.....
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...