Request for comment: Collapse of the U. S. A.

[New Nexus]

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> paradigm scmaradigm

>

> you've said it all before HAL

Now let me see, was not HAL given conflicting orders and programming by the NSA, so no change there then.

USA

Ya, Saddam, go invade Kuwait we don?t care.

USA

Ha, look that bad old Saddam has invaded Kuwait, we better go kick his ass.

Hallibuton ? blackwater new song, we are in the money-lots of money.

Lyrics by Dick Cheney.

[ibilly99]

http://www.osugamers.com/images/gallery/Cats%20and%20other%20RandomImages/dont%20let%20thread%20die.jpg

[Voyageur]

AAAAAAAaaaaaaaaarggghhhhh!!! http://emotloader.hu/emoticons/angry/Colere_33%20-%20emotloader.hu.gif

[ibilly99]

You need to get your image right

http://www.sectalk.com/boards/images/imported/2011/08/CatPleaseDontLetThisThreadDie-1.jpg

Like this

http://emotloader.hu/emoticons/angry/Colere_33%20-%20emotloader.hu.gif

[LadyDeliah]

:))

[New Nexus]

http://torontohearings.org/

The Toronto Hearings

8 to 11 sep

start 9am local

2pm UK

[Frankito]

I love money!>:D

[Jeremy]

New Nexus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> http://torontohearings.org/

>

> The Toronto Hearings

> 8 to 11 sep

> start 9am local

> 2pm UK

Now I know you're taking the p!ss.

[New Nexus]

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> New Nexus Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > http://torontohearings.org/

> >

> > The Toronto Hearings

> > 8 to 11 sep

> > start 9am local

> > 2pm UK

>

>

> Now I know you're taking the p!ss.

If your statement was fact.

I am nether equipped nor qualified to extract urine.

If your statement was metaphoric.

Given the Toronto hearings have only started yesterday, you may want to wait and see what information is put forward before casting judgment,

or maybe the tabloid have already told you how to think.

http://torontohearings.org/

[Jeremy]

New Nexus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> maybe the tabloid have already told you how to think.

You've got me there.

[Undisputedtruth]

There was a good programme about the 911 conspiracy theories on BBC2 last night.

My view on the 911 conspiracy theory is there was no conspiracy by the US Government. I don't think they're that competent enough to pull something of that scale successfully.

I don't doubt there are pockets of evidence which points to conspiracies but on the other hand normal science explanations supports a different view.

[New Nexus]

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There was a good programme about the 911

> conspiracy theories on BBC2 last night.

>

> My view on the 911 conspiracy theory is there was

> no conspiracy by the US Government. I don't think

> they're that competent enough to pull something of

> that scale successfully.

>

> I don't doubt there are pockets of evidence which

> points to conspiracies but on the other hand

> normal science explanations supports a different

> view.

NIST did not find evidence of demolition materials, i.e. explosives - because they did not look for any.

If a building falls down because of fire (WTC-7) standard practice.

Do?s

Look for an accelerant.

Don?ts

Ship evidence across the sea?s to China and India

[Undisputedtruth]

The BBC programme covered accelerants and WTC-7.

While the financial crisis is still an ongoing matter which concerns us all I think the 911 conspiracy theory has run its course.

[New Nexus]

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The BBC programme covered accelerants and WTC-7.

>

> While the financial crisis is still an ongoing

> matter which concerns us all I think the 911

> conspiracy theory has run its course.

Did the BBC cover the nano-thermite ?

Parts of the financial issues of today have their origins in WTC.

[Undisputedtruth]

Yes they did. Even featured the Danish scientist who suggested the substance.

You should be able to catch the programme on iplayer.

The financial issues started well before 911.

[New Nexus]

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes they did. Even featured the Danish scientist

> who suggested the substance.

>

> You should be able to catch the programme on

> iplayer.

>

> The financial issues started well before 911.

U.S. crisis started 1913

2001 WTC was pivotal in expanding this crisis further.

[Undisputedtruth]

Greed have always been a factor in any financial bubble and I don't think there are enough controls to stop the next bubble either. There will always be financial bubbles. With the bets getting larger, can taxpayers be able to afford to cover the next set of losses?

Sorry NN but I disagree with your suggestions.

[StraferJack]

Some of the character types sound familiar, no?

[Undisputedtruth]

Still up to your old tricks Straferjack.

[StraferJack]

what trick is that? What's tricksy about the post?

it links to a review of a TV show which had a number of conspiracy theorists, which were described in the review. Some of them seem very familiar types. It's not controversial or tricksy is it?

[Undisputedtruth]

Perhaps it's time we hear something from you in terms of intellect.

[HAL9000]

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> conspiracy theorists

Just to put the record straight: I have only ever used this screen name on the EDF.

[New Nexus]

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Greed have always been a factor in any financial

> bubble and I don't think there are enough controls

> to stop the next bubble either. There will always

> be financial bubbles. With the bets getting

> larger, can taxpayers be able to afford to cover

> the next set of losses?

>

> Sorry NN but I disagree with your suggestions.

It?s cool to disagree,

Let give you a possible scenario,

1993 first attack on WTC, turns-out CIA running that one, but opppps didn?t fall down. You were right EDT, CIA are not ?competent enough?, Dam not got enough support to go to war.

So 2001 we have an outsourced attack, but just to make sure they get all goals met, lets wirer up the buildings, good way to make the securities and exchange problem go away too, plus US get to invade any country they want.

US already said in 2000 they needed a new pearl harbor, well they got it, and just like pearl harbor they made sure they got it.

Wars make profits for some and austerity for others.

Money is just money, power is the real game in town.

[*Bob*]

I never knew that about Pearl Harbour!!

Wowzer - all this stuff really makes you think.

[mockney piers]

Oh bob. Poor naive bob, you have so much to learn. Wait until you see how the footage of poland being invaded was faked!