Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Strafer, you've got to be joking. No-one could construe it as so, the remark about bunnies as being less offensive as using the word animals was even more galling in itself. Did he think anyone would believe that for a second? So no, I don't think anyone will see it as him being a victim of pc-gone-mad (by people with a brain, that is)


PS - going back a page, did you spot that comment from SeanMac (RIP) "mum doing kitcheny things in the kitchen" !! Glad HE'S gone...harrumph.

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> now Katie, you SAY that - but there is a reason

> the telegraph will have closed the article to

> comments.


Yeah, I ws going to comment on that earlier but as I don't read the Torygraph regularly (and never the opinion pieces anyway as I hate those in whatever paper) but...my understanding is that anyone who thinks the paper (certainly over the last 5years if not more) is very right-wing is mistaken. Its as bland as the Independent.


So wholly surprised to see that bit about comments not being allowed but there you go...

My comment wasn?t really a reflection on the Telegraph. Or any paper that closes it?s comments to particular articles. But when you get the hate-merchants in full-flow on any board ? including this one* - it?s not a pretty sight . (or even a legal one sometimes)


*I?m thinking of some of the long-removed posts from certain repeatedly-banished visitors


Edited to say an earlier comment of mine said "some Tories" would say this was an example of PC gone mad. And that is true - if this guy thinks he can say it, he will have friends who certainly think that way. But I shouldn't have been so specific.. I should have said many, mostly right-wing people, will think this is an example of PC gone too far


And it is these people who would have hit the comments section hard


It's not contentious btw, to say that it does tend to be right-wing (or 'libertarians' as some insist) who are obsessed with PC stopping them doing things is it?

  • 1 month later...

But seriously, after 2000 years of burning dissenters and torturing 16 year old girls who need a bit of loving care, who really gives a monkeys about Christians getting some verbal on the BBC?


Most people who burned on a stake drowned in their own lungs desperate attempts to lubricate the flames.


Get a sense of perspective, please.

The majority of the world's population subscribe to one of the three Abrahamic religions - Judaism, Christianity or Islam.


This year is:


1432 AH if you are a Moslem


2011 AD if your are a Christian


5771 AM if you are Jewish


If, like me, you ae an atheist, then you could expect to use a dating system that reflects the tradition of e country in which you live. In UK that would be a western Christian tradition - thus we use the terms AD / BC and they should carry no pejorative connotation nor any element of offence to other faiths.


I doubt many Muslims or Jews are worrying about it - altho' the Jewish faith will, when referring to the Gregorian / Western Christian calendar avoid the use of the term Lord or Christ as the figure referred to is n ot considered a Lord / Christ in their religion.


This whole matter seems petty and of very minor significance - except in that it represents a shift away from Britain's western Christian tradition, and I deplore a shift from tradition unless there is a very good reason. I can see no very good reason for this proposed change in terminology.


Edited for spelling and clarity

Complete and utter madness.


Common Era???


what the hell is all that about - what does it mean? the dinosaurs ruled for 200 million years, is that a common era?


And, to prove their own idiocy, BCE and Ace both equate to BC and AD.


They'll be banning advertising of peanuts soon because one person in a million is allergic to them.

People seem to be missing the point - it's a non-story, dressing up something to have a nother pop at a supposed "PC gone mad"


no-one is banning anything, the BBC continue to use BC and AD and noone has suggested it's offending any other religions


But then again I'm a celsius man, nor a farenheit guy, so maybe I would say that. I'm also quite keen on decimal and wouldn't want to go back to pounds, shillings and pence. Or groats

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
    • How long is a piece of string? AI was a bit rubbish on this one, but Checatrade : average cost to paint a house exterior is around £30 per square metre So depends on the size, access, time to put up scaffolding and cost of hiring and building that, surface preparation, and quality of materials.   Checkatrade put it at £2.5 k for average semi, that sounds a little cheap.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...