Jump to content

Recommended Posts

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Alan Medic Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> > A good scrubber will have a sparkling jam pan.


> ...and you'll be able to see your face in it.


... and maybe even someone else's.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> maxxi Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Alan Medic Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > > A good scrubber will have a sparkling jam

> pan.

>

> > ...and you'll be able to see your face in it.

>

> ... and maybe even someone else's.



3's a crowd surely...

You lot are BAAAAD...


but you have me in stitches.


Well, the update is that I have been far too busy having a fun time that I have neglected to work further on said jam pan. I have yet to attempt RosieH's trick of scouring whilst simmering, BUT - given that I would much rather go to the pub than scrub tonight - I have decided to start again a la maxxi. I did manage to chip away at more of the black encrustation with lemon zester (sturdier than the now redundant frosting spatula), the remainder of which is proving more than a trifle stubborn. I reckon I've around 17% to go. Maxxi are you SURE I am not wasting my time here? Seems to me that Ariel has done as much as it is going to do :-S. If I were to simmer the concoction as per Ladygooner as I did in the beginning, would that now "cook" the remainder of burntness making the problem worse - or not?


I do appreciate your input, all of you.


Thanks.

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LM - the bio powder solution (see what I did there?) works as the enzymes in the powder eat

> away at the burnt sugar but if seriously affected it may take time. Ladygooner's simmering may work

> if you remember not to leave the pan alone.


Though I suspect most washing powder enzymes probably work best at about 40 degrees. Heating them to boiling point may render them useless.

@ ianr:

Judging by its weight and look, and the fact that previous attempts to clean by boiling vinegar/lemon juice have left no mark on said pan, I believe it is made of steel. As for webcam...sorry...I am too much of a technophobe. However, I may take a picture and get hubby to plonk it on here.


@ maxxi:

You are the epitome of unswerving patience and endurance. I think, due to the fresh batch of bio powder solution, I have tonight been able to chisel away at yet more of the black stuff. Must be down to the last 10% now: it's getting exciting! Apologies for doubting you earlier.


@ Loz:

An interesting point. But are you saying then, that when I wash my red-wine/curry/tomato-sauce etc. stained white linen tablecloth at 95 degrees, that it is not the enzymes that are responsible for the removal of the stain(s)?

Laddy Muck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> @ Loz:

> An interesting point. But are you saying then, that when I wash my red-wine/curry/tomato-sauce

> etc. stained white linen tablecloth at 95 degrees, that it is not the enzymes that are responsible

> for the removal of the stain(s)?


Probably not. Most bio washing powder enzymes work best at temperature of 30 to 60 degrees, and normal pH. Change the pH or heat them up too much and the enzymes denature - break down.


Washing powder effectiveness comes from two sources: the surfactants and the enzymes. In non-bio powder, you only have the surfactants. So, I'd suspect that at 95 degrees you would have probably killed off any enzymes and would be relying on the surfactant effect only (plus the effect of very hot water). Since biological washing powder contains less surfactants (as the enzymes are expected to do a lot of the work), you'd probably be better off with a non-bio at this temp.

Right! The moment some of you have been waiting for, LOL. Following further chiseling half an hour ago, this is how the pan now looks (it's pretty good considering the whole of the base was a very dense black). Big thumbs up for bio-powder-solution so far. Will it complete the job? Well, we shall see. However, before I place more of the solution into the pan, I thought I'd show you what has been achieved. Less than 5% to go, by my reckoning. Voila!

Yeah yeah, you have got to be joking LM!!!! Sorry but that pan looks like its just out of the shop. With a few black toast crumbs thrown in for good measure.


Either that or you've been doing a lot of scrubbing. Its practically pristine. (I am comparing it with one that I inherited that has probably been through two world wars though). But even so...

Heh heh LLKVDPP...nope tis my jam pan for all to see! I've had it a few years, and yes, I do like to look after my things - hence why I panicked when it sustained 3 degree burns this time around. Am hoping that, by tomorrow, the inside will be as good as new (save for some scratch marks where I lost patience and used a paring knife to scrape...).


PS: where are you now? I am just leaving LOL!


*logs out*

Well I'm chuffed. After nearly 2 weeks of soaking/simmering in bio-power-solution, my jam pan is finally burn free. Chiseled off the remaining charcoal today.


It's bottom is a little scarred and scratched, but I reckon I won't get it much cleaner than this!


A big thanks to you all for your valuable contributions.

Laddy Muck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> It's bottom is a little scarred and scratched !


Oh dear:-S


That's where the trouble will be.


It might look bright and shiny now but come "the jammin"


* dong dong donggggggg *


" Sticker-oo time, all over again "



Nette:X

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...