Jump to content

Recommended Posts

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Alan Medic Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> > A good scrubber will have a sparkling jam pan.


> ...and you'll be able to see your face in it.


... and maybe even someone else's.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> maxxi Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Alan Medic Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > > A good scrubber will have a sparkling jam

> pan.

>

> > ...and you'll be able to see your face in it.

>

> ... and maybe even someone else's.



3's a crowd surely...

You lot are BAAAAD...


but you have me in stitches.


Well, the update is that I have been far too busy having a fun time that I have neglected to work further on said jam pan. I have yet to attempt RosieH's trick of scouring whilst simmering, BUT - given that I would much rather go to the pub than scrub tonight - I have decided to start again a la maxxi. I did manage to chip away at more of the black encrustation with lemon zester (sturdier than the now redundant frosting spatula), the remainder of which is proving more than a trifle stubborn. I reckon I've around 17% to go. Maxxi are you SURE I am not wasting my time here? Seems to me that Ariel has done as much as it is going to do :-S. If I were to simmer the concoction as per Ladygooner as I did in the beginning, would that now "cook" the remainder of burntness making the problem worse - or not?


I do appreciate your input, all of you.


Thanks.

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LM - the bio powder solution (see what I did there?) works as the enzymes in the powder eat

> away at the burnt sugar but if seriously affected it may take time. Ladygooner's simmering may work

> if you remember not to leave the pan alone.


Though I suspect most washing powder enzymes probably work best at about 40 degrees. Heating them to boiling point may render them useless.

@ ianr:

Judging by its weight and look, and the fact that previous attempts to clean by boiling vinegar/lemon juice have left no mark on said pan, I believe it is made of steel. As for webcam...sorry...I am too much of a technophobe. However, I may take a picture and get hubby to plonk it on here.


@ maxxi:

You are the epitome of unswerving patience and endurance. I think, due to the fresh batch of bio powder solution, I have tonight been able to chisel away at yet more of the black stuff. Must be down to the last 10% now: it's getting exciting! Apologies for doubting you earlier.


@ Loz:

An interesting point. But are you saying then, that when I wash my red-wine/curry/tomato-sauce etc. stained white linen tablecloth at 95 degrees, that it is not the enzymes that are responsible for the removal of the stain(s)?

Laddy Muck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> @ Loz:

> An interesting point. But are you saying then, that when I wash my red-wine/curry/tomato-sauce

> etc. stained white linen tablecloth at 95 degrees, that it is not the enzymes that are responsible

> for the removal of the stain(s)?


Probably not. Most bio washing powder enzymes work best at temperature of 30 to 60 degrees, and normal pH. Change the pH or heat them up too much and the enzymes denature - break down.


Washing powder effectiveness comes from two sources: the surfactants and the enzymes. In non-bio powder, you only have the surfactants. So, I'd suspect that at 95 degrees you would have probably killed off any enzymes and would be relying on the surfactant effect only (plus the effect of very hot water). Since biological washing powder contains less surfactants (as the enzymes are expected to do a lot of the work), you'd probably be better off with a non-bio at this temp.

Right! The moment some of you have been waiting for, LOL. Following further chiseling half an hour ago, this is how the pan now looks (it's pretty good considering the whole of the base was a very dense black). Big thumbs up for bio-powder-solution so far. Will it complete the job? Well, we shall see. However, before I place more of the solution into the pan, I thought I'd show you what has been achieved. Less than 5% to go, by my reckoning. Voila!

Yeah yeah, you have got to be joking LM!!!! Sorry but that pan looks like its just out of the shop. With a few black toast crumbs thrown in for good measure.


Either that or you've been doing a lot of scrubbing. Its practically pristine. (I am comparing it with one that I inherited that has probably been through two world wars though). But even so...

Heh heh LLKVDPP...nope tis my jam pan for all to see! I've had it a few years, and yes, I do like to look after my things - hence why I panicked when it sustained 3 degree burns this time around. Am hoping that, by tomorrow, the inside will be as good as new (save for some scratch marks where I lost patience and used a paring knife to scrape...).


PS: where are you now? I am just leaving LOL!


*logs out*

Well I'm chuffed. After nearly 2 weeks of soaking/simmering in bio-power-solution, my jam pan is finally burn free. Chiseled off the remaining charcoal today.


It's bottom is a little scarred and scratched, but I reckon I won't get it much cleaner than this!


A big thanks to you all for your valuable contributions.

Laddy Muck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> It's bottom is a little scarred and scratched !


Oh dear:-S


That's where the trouble will be.


It might look bright and shiny now but come "the jammin"


* dong dong donggggggg *


" Sticker-oo time, all over again "



Nette:X

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
    • And I replied: Mandelson and Trump have much in common. They are both shallow, vulgar and vain. They both fetishise wealth and power, irrespective of who holds it or how it was accumulated. They were both close friends and associates of the late Jeffrey Epstein and have moved in the same circles, as Ghislaine Maxwell’s address book allegedly confirms. Recognising another who is utterly transactional and lacking in a moral compass, there’s every chance of “Petie” fitting right in Mar-a-Largo. That Starmer couldn’t anticipate that Mandelson’s past behaviour would be problematic just proves how inept this government is.
    • Can't agree with that because he is a superb communicator - a really smart and  smooth talker. He studied PPE at Oxford and was communications director for Labour for many years.  Setting aside the "minor"  indiscretions during his time in government he has all the smoothness and ability to flatter Trump without appearing obsequious. Plus he can manage and exploit  Trump’s ego. He is highly polished socially, comfortable in elite circles, skilled at making personal connections. He can flatter and disarm, which is a useful tactic with Trump, who responds well to personal respect and praise. As a former EU Trade Commissioner and Cabinet minister, Mandelson understands international relations, trade, and diplomacy. He knows how to frame issues in terms of “wins” that Trump could claim credit for. I honestly hope that he survives.  
    • He is toast  he should never have been appointed  and starmer flannelling about all of this shows exceptionally poor judgement  a disgrace all around 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...