Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It's getting to the point where Stabbings are no longer News-worthy.


People are no longer shocked by such news.


The Government knows that while the people are fighting each other, they are not fighting the Government.

This makes the people divided and weak.. and that suits all Governments.


It's all very very sad.


DulwichFox

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's getting to the point where Stabbings are no

> longer News-worthy.

>

> People are no longer shocked by such news.

>

> The Government knows that while the people are

> fighting each other, they are not fighting the

> Government.

> This makes the people divided and weak.. and

> that suits all Governments.

>

> It's all very very sad.

>

> DulwichFox


No argument with your first point but do you really mean the second part - that the Government is in some way allowing or wanting people to kill each other over trifles?

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > It's getting to the point where Stabbings are

> no

> > longer News-worthy.

> >

> > People are no longer shocked by such news.

> >

> > The Government knows that while the people

> are

> > fighting each other, they are not fighting the

> > Government.

> > This makes the people divided and weak.. and

> > that suits all Governments.

> >

> > It's all very very sad.

> >

> > DulwichFox

>

> No argument with your first point but do you

> really mean the second part - that the Government

> is in some way allowing or wanting people to kill

> each other over trifles?


I reckon it comes down to language, Fox didn't say they want it, but it can suit them - just as George W. doubtless didn't "want" 9/11 (unless you believe the tinfoil hat merchants) but it did suit his agenda of massively boosting defence spending and taking revenge for daddy's defeat in Iraq.

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Frankly I'm not sure Theresa May gives much

> thought to people at all. I think she's more a

> policies and process person.


And what, pray. do you expect her to do?


There was a shooting in Deptford as well

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/6424923/london-shooting-man-machine-gun-brent-stabbing-deptford/

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Frankly I'm not sure Theresa May gives much

> > thought to people at all. I think she's more a

> > policies and process person.

>

> And what, pray. do you expect her to do?


Reinstating the ?600m of cuts she's imposed on the Met as Home Secretary and PM might be a good start.

violent crime cannot be totally removed but it can be controlled, most often by cash funding. unfortunately , this is an exponetial costing problem - the fat tails are the hardest and most costly to cover, so tolerance risk models are used to determine the best confidence scenario & provide some kind of acceptable balance. These fat tails take the form of dead young men these days. the accceptable output of a risk model that has accepted a certain level of fatality as part of the cost cutting. the UKG has accepted this level of slaughter as part of its never ending austerity programme. these dead young men are the direct result of cold number crunching.

flocker spotter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> violent crime cannot be totally removed but it can

> be controlled, most often by cash funding.

> unfortunately , this is an exponetial costing

> problem - the fat tails are the hardest and most

> costly to cover, so tolerance risk models are used

> to determine the best confidence scenario &

> provide some kind of acceptable balance. These fat

> tails take the form of dead young men these days.

> the accceptable output of a risk model that has

> accepted a certain level of fatality as part of

> the cost cutting. the UKG has accepted this level

> of slaughter as part of its never ending austerity

> programme. these dead young men are the direct

> result of cold number crunching.


Truth.

flocker spotter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> violent crime cannot be totally removed but it can

> be controlled, most often by cash funding.

> unfortunately , this is an exponetial costing

> problem - the fat tails are the hardest and most

> costly to cover, so tolerance risk models are used

> to determine the best confidence scenario &

> provide some kind of acceptable balance. These fat

> tails take the form of dead young men these days.

> the accceptable output of a risk model that has

> accepted a certain level of fatality as part of

> the cost cutting. the UKG has accepted this level

> of slaughter as part of its never ending austerity

> programme. these dead young men are the direct

> result of cold number crunching.


But the government denies there being any links whatsoever between for instance benefit cuts and suicides (which to most people would seem a sensible link) - so either they know they are using statistical methods and lying or they don't know what they're doing.


https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/may/13/suicides-of-benefit-claimants-reveal-dwp-flaws-says-inquiry

I was waiting at the lights on my bike on the OKR, next to the taped off area. While i was there (a minute or so) two people separately ducked under the tape and walked across the crime scene; despite the presence of a SOCO in white overalls doing the necessary. The two police on guard went ape and took their names; despite protests from both that they'd done nothing wrong.

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Of course no government will admit it's policies

> kill people - would be political suicide..


of course, but it is all about what is politically tolerable. As much as the headline grabbing incidents are bad news for all involved, it does - rightly or wrongly - lead to the question about how communities( and their members) are ranked and the loading involved in making these economic decisions- if people were being shanked and shot on a daily basis in Chelsea, the situation & outcomes would likely be far different

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Are there any other executors? Is the solicitor a soke practioner or part of a firm? Are you and your fellow beneficiaries behaving well?  You will want to take proper  legal advice (which this is not) but you can have an executor removed by the court if they are refusing to communicate with you. I would just do that. Tell him you are doing it, tell him you have reported him to the Law Society (if you have) and tell him you will be challenging his fees with the legal services ombudsman. This all sounds outrageous to me and this solicitor doesn't sound fit to practice. Three years sounds far too long for a low value estate comprising mostly of a house. He should have sold that or rented it out whilst he was waiting to administer the estate.    Sounds like he has cost you all a lot of money.  
    • Would wholeheartedly recommend Aria. Quality work, very responsive, lovely guy as well. 
    • A positive update from Southwark Council - “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.“  
    • A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there? In fuller detail: The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US.  It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall. The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively. He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money. We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts. But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house. However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more. Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.   Help!        
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...