Jump to content

Recommended Posts

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2033882/Want-rail-ticket-Use-machine-customers-told-manned-offices-faces-axe.html


Yes, nothing's ever eaten as hot as it's cooked; yes, the DAILY MAIL specialises in heatings-up.


But the list of railway stations slated for closure -- Queens Road Peckham, East Dulwich, West Dulwich, Gipsy Hill, Brixton, Loughborough Junction, Nunhead, North Dulwich -- is kick after kick in the face of South London. Or so it seems to me.

It looks like a wholesale culling of stations on our line. Interesting to compare with the superb Great Eastern Line serving East London. Can't see a single one of those stations on the list.


Seems like it's Southern Rail's effort at cost cutting.

I have used E Dulwich station now for almost two years. as I use an auto top up Oyster card I have never felt the need to use the ticket office. I would think that this is probably the case for 80% of travellers.


Keeping the ticket office manned is unlikely to affect safety - if they have to be in the ticket office they'll not be on the platform looking after passengers.


High fares are criticised - but this seems to me a fairly rational decision.

I think it's really not good if the station was to be without an attendent. Ok, they aren't patoling the station platforms but there is at least someone there should you need to call upon someone for help. And you never know when you might need to call upon the help of the station attendent. Earlier this year, I was on the platform and witnessed a woman lose her shoe which fell onto the track! It sounds strange but it was a sort of sandle type thing and as she walked to the edge of the platform she somehow must of sort of kicked it off. Anyway, she was there with one shoe on her foot on her way to work and somone got the attendent who had this pole thing and used it to get her shoe. He said that people lose all sorts of things down on the tracks like phones, bags, etc.

I'd feel much more safer if I could use the ticket office at all times, instead of the ticket machines on the main road at East Dulwich.


You can't beat asking the booking clerk at ED where as you may make a mistake booking a ticket to somewhere further afield.


Also there is the option of booking a ticket online before you leave the station, which you can pick up the tickets from the machine, but what if it breaks?


For those of us at the other end of LL/Forest Hill Road. Honor Oak Park and Forest Hill ticket offices are not proposed for closure.

Until the Southern network was re-franchised a couple of years ago the ED ticket office (like most on the route) was only open for the first half of the day - something I would guess had probably been the case since BR cost-cutting in the 70's or 80's.


It was only due to funding from Transport for London that all Southern ticket offices within Greater London were then opened all day, every day, (regardless of customer levels) which seemed odd as it was at the same time as they were at war with Bob Crowe due to partially closing ticket offices at suburban underground stations.


I may be completely wrong, but my guess is that this commitment is pretty much locked in to the end of the franchise and that the national report quoted simply looked at the national list of station usage figures and said if all ticket offices at stations below a daily usage of 'x' were closed then '?y' would be saved.


Having said that I'd be curious to know how many customers per hour they actually deal with during the extended times that TfL (i.e. us) are funding. Although I commute by bus, the times when I do come back by train in the evening the person invariably has his/her head in a paperback.

I'm pretty ambivalent about whether the ticket office is staffed or not. In 5 years of living here and using the station every day, I've not once used the ticket office (well, actually, I tried to buy a travelcard there on my Oyster once and was told I had to use the machine...)


But I'm surprised that ED is on the list of category "E" stations, given that these are "675 small staffed stations which typically have only one member of staff in attendance at any one time. Many stations will only be staffed for part of the day. Trips will be typically up to 250,000 per annum and revenue up to ?1 million."


Surely ED has a lot more trips than that? Although I can appreciate that revenue may be less than ?1m, especially if they disregard ticket machine revenue.

Apart from the inconvenience for those people who do not have Oyster cards and are occasional travellers and who prefer interaction with a human being not a machine, (which will probably be out of order or only taking cards when some of us prefer to pay cash) the main guy who works at the ticket office at ED is absolutely lovely and I would be really sorry if he lost his job. This applies to other staff at other stations too - I hope they are redeployed and not made jobless.
If these stations are not to be manned then they must at least be regularly visited by supervisory staff, so that things like lighting, hazards, working machinery etc. can be checked. The stations cannot be abandonded, even where ticketing staff are no longer to be available. Perhaps the wonderful Barry could indicate what will be the planned support to those stations who lose permanently based ticket office staff? Will there be non-ticketing staff there, at least some of the time?

This is old news from over two months ago.

A report sponsored by the previous government was issued in June/July from memory.

It makes recommendations that would involve all rail station ticket offices closing in Southwark except a handfall of major one's - London Bridge.


For a summary I made 1 July:


http://jamesbarber.mycouncillor.org.uk/2011/07/01/east-dulwich-station-ticket-office-closing/

Not everyone fines the ticket machine straight forward, what happens if it not working I feel there should be some sort of presence there especially at night a lot of the South East London Stations are not well lit, what about the safety of passengers as there not been a few incidents that has happen?

How? From the platforms they are 50m away locked in a fairly sound proofed room. And you can bet that they are not watching the cctv at all, would (quite rightly) refuse to approach any 'rogues' and can't call the police any quicker that you can.


The difference to safety between them being there and not being there is very, very, very negligible.

e-dealer,


Do you require someone to look out for you everywhere you are?


You could be mugged in the street, on a bus, in a crowd, in a pub, on Peckham Rye or anywhere else. You might be alone or accompanied.


What makes a station so special? What additional duty of care should a travel company have - beyond providing you with transport and a place to catch that transport?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s the impact the festival has on the community, the people living next door to the park who have to endure the thumping music and worse. Then there’s the park and the state it’s left in and the wildlife, especially nesting birds. All the roads going down Denmark Hill towards the park were closed off and roads off half moon lane and going up towards West Norwood closed off with wardens at each end, who were paid by Lambeth Council to stand there for the 4 days.  The festival made the news channels and interviews suggested most of the people attending weren’t fron the local area but places like Ireland and Scotland.  I live a 20 minute walk from the park and could hear the thumping music all day and night. Also the wind certainly carried the smell of drugs to my garden! For 4 days I couldn’t believe how strong it was. 
    • Emirates Stadium is  >60,00 but they tend to be very quiet 🙂 Jokes aside though, it's a case in point. Highbury was <40,000 and was 300M up the road, so there are definitely Islington residents who used to live half a mile from a fairly big football stadium, and now live right by a massive one. One that holds rock/pop concerts too accomodating 70,000 fans whether they like ot or not.   40% of Islington households are in social housing so regardless of when they moved their current homes, they may have had little say in exactly where they are housed.   
    • St Christopher's only take books in perfect condition. 
    • This is where I sit too. A two day event is bearable. Three tests my tolerance. Finding the right balance on size, noise and impact is where I contribute to the consultation process. BUT, as I wrote elsewhere, every year the GALA organisers ask/ push for more, and deals have already been done with the council before it gets to public consultation stage. It is also worth pointing out that when a licence was first granted, the orgnaisation was different (We Are the Fair), one of the company directors lived literally next to the park (she left when it became GALA) and the current form bears no resemblance to original ethos/ vision sold to the council and licensing committee. This needs to be pointed out and I am fairly confident local councillors would also support a pushback on any further expansion. We have local elections next year, so councillors ears will be open.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...