Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The baby whisper riled me right up, erroneous advice re: breastfeeding. We bumble along too, Sebs as mad as a box of frogs but happy, as is Lex (as far as I can tell...) so we must be doing something right, I suppose.
Didn't look at BW for feeding advice (got that from Joanne @ Kings & the Peckham br/feeding cafe). But found it did help me find a way to muddle through - course we're not EASY anymore but in the first 6 mths it helped me relax & enjoy Bugglet.

I've not read much, but the wife has read a shed load of books, with varying styles of parenting advise. To be fair, she is actually very interested in child development, so not actually reading them for advise, but rather because of interest in the research side of things.


I just bumble along, but we definitely err on the side of child centred / attachment parenting.

Ruth_Baldock Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The baby whisper riled me right up, erroneous

> advice re: breastfeeding. We bumble along too,

> Sebs as mad as a box of frogs but happy, as is Lex

> (as far as I can tell...) so we must be doing

> something right, I suppose.



I have just finished Baby Whisperer (thanks Buggie!) and since I am just starting out with my first due in February I wondered Ruth which bits you didn't like about her take on breastfeeding. My novice take on it was that she wanted people to feel comfortable with their own choices - whether it be breastfeeding or bottle feeding - and to not be afraid to mix the two, or to feel a failure if breastfeeding doesn't work for them. Maybe I was just reading what I already believe! But if there's anything that you really think is questionable, I'd welcome the feedback.

In one bit she refers to a Mother's "yield" from expressing and says the mother couldn't pump much which meant she had low supply. Total and utter bollocks, expressing is NOT a reliable indicator of supply.

On the other hand, for me the BW was the only book I could relate to and feel competent about (sorry Ruth :))


Before baby, I read Dr Sears and Pantley; talk about false expectations. There was nothing about my intense, colicky, spirited baby that I recognized in those books. It actually started to make me feel bad about both of us. And wow did I ever get a lot of well meaning but crap advice from everyone and their dog. Then based on friends' suggestions I started reading more and more books, not because it's my style but because I was starting to freak out about my challenging baby that steam rolled over any instincts I had. When I found the BW and read about spirited babies, a light bulb went on and I finally read about babies I recognized. Her methods worked for us and I honestly don't know what my next move would have been had I not tried it. It took a couple of months but everything changed for us.


I always chuckle a bit when Gina Ford comes up, don't know what the national obsession is but I can say that nobody in North America has ever heard of her, yet a surprising amount of babies end up on a similar program. Coincidence?


I get that people don't want to rely on books, but when I got home with my newborn I realized I knew as much about babies as I did changing the oil in my car. It's just worth remembering that for every psychologist who peddles their theories, there's another with the opposite conclusion. Aside from doing studies on twins separated at birth (not a huge sample obviously), it's really not possible to solve the nature/nurture debate so I kind of view claims on either side as bad science. Just me of course.


I actually like the wisdom of the nannies TBH. It's like asking doctors to overhaul the healthcare system, instead of leaving it to lawyers in government. From Eton.

HH - I think you have a point on the 'bad science'. There is interesting research for sure, but I'm yet to find what I feel is conclusive proof on most parenting issues. Which is why it is particularly annoying (rant inducing!) when you see 'bad science' combined with hysterical morally infused lecturing from so-called 'experts'.


I've adopted OJ as my 'pet hate'.

helena handbasket Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

>

> I actually like the wisdom of the nannies TBH.

> It's like asking doctors to overhaul the

> healthcare system, instead of leaving it to

> lawyers in government. From Eton.


PMSL @ that HH:))


Another bumbler here. I've dipped into a few books in my time sometimes for personal reasons, sometimes professional. For me & my kids none of them made me think "oh, I'll definitely do that" - though after a crisis of confidence I did try Gina's potty training techniques with number 4. It was crap for us so I went back to doing what I'd done with the other 3 - we just bumbled through it all. My best parenting advice has always come from other Mums, trial & error, & yes, instinct (I suspect this is more down to in depth knowledge of my child, me, & our family unit than anything more ethereal). Having said all that I do think that parenting books have a place; if it's only that in reading them you are made to question more analytically what it is you do/ don't do that works/ doesn't work.


I find it helps to keep in mind Phillip Larkin through the child raising process.

Perhaps we should blame the devices people have said that is the difference between the two. I agree with everyone who had given a kind advice.And they have also say everything has to be tested before its purchase if you plan a long term,as what you have now Is very good. To have good feelings towards others as more important than anything else in this world and I think I have in my house more than that. Sight!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes - adult care is a large part of the CT bill.  That does not mean the council spend our money well or wisely.        
    • “What do councils spend all the money on?” Is, in my view, one of the most profoundly emblematic of our times  we go about our lives, backed up by councils and governments and complain they aren’t needed  reform win elections based on “we’re gonna go in and slash all the waste!” Only to later admit there effectively isn’t any oh and by the way we need to increase council tax   Now all we have to offer is racism and ineptitude sorry about that  https://www.gbnews.com/money/reform-elon-musk-doge-failed-savings So where does the money go? On a multitude of services - but the increasingly aged population and the care provision required is a large part of it  the government could give councils more money to avoid council tax rises  - but the we would have to pay more in jewels taxation  and as a country we tend to pay less than other similar countries  so we end up with an expensive mend and make do approach  I don’t see any political parties offering a solution   Starmer is obviously lacking in many areas but he is the result of a hostile media and a reluctant population willing to hear truths  (wait until we hear how much we will need to increase defence spending by in the coming years) If a party stopped pretending all the money was wasted but published a list of costs, projections and proposals that wasn’t gutted to suit the landscape of needing to not bemonstered by the press or deemed too expensive by voters I would be very interested      can’t see that happening tho  (also worth reminding ourselves of all the brexiters who said things like “I don’t care how much it costs   I don’t care if I lose my job  it’s about taking back control!” And yet now we find them complaining about increasing costs. As they always will complain about everything  because it’s always someone else’s fault)   
    • I wouldn't be going all the way to Dobbies  just to take flowerpots! 😀 It's a very good garden centre with a wide range of well kept  plants and helpful staff, at least it was on the only occasion I've visited it, last year!
    • Why do Councils need more funding? What are they spending our money on, how efficiently are they running? are they performing an adequate service as is? Are they viewing the public with contempt, that we will continually foot larger bills to cover all and any costs? Do our counsellors do their best, for us? why are they adding this on to the residents, on top of tax already paid? Council tax is not insubstantial. The service provided is not great. I do not believe they use our money effectively.  Our CT Bill is £50 a week.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...