Jump to content

Recommended Posts

heartblock Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Is it better now and can you just pay for a swim

> deal with them or do you have to pay for swim and

> gym.


As far as I know the only options are swimming, gym and exercise classes in a bundle or swimming and gym together, no swimming only membership.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/195443-daily-swim/#findComment-1256313
Share on other sites

If you're a Southwark resident you can use it free all day Friday and afternoons Saturday and Sunday. Sometimes I swim three times a week and just pay for one day off peak (?4.40), so average ?1.47 a swim.


Over-60s get more discounts; not sure what they are but if it applies to you perhaps you can get away without a membership.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/195443-daily-swim/#findComment-1257032
Share on other sites

I love the lido, but didn?t really get on with the women?s facilities- changing area and lockers. Found it difficult for me. Also gets a bit crazy, busy in the Summer and slightly too far for a daily 20 min swim, but it is a fantastic local spot and I?m glad it?s open and thriving. Dulwich is working out fine, so thank you everyone for your comments and help.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/195443-daily-swim/#findComment-1258463
Share on other sites

Maybe JAGs has changed, but I was a member a while back and the early mornings were very restrictive for lane swimming. It was also the same price as a place I used to go to when working at the Royal Brompton in pricey Chelsea, but at the Chelsea gym you got a towel, lovely changing rooms and could swim anytime, so I left JAGs in the end as the pool was unavailable when I could go and it didn?t offer enough for the price. I liked the pool though, so if it has changed I might try again.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/195443-daily-swim/#findComment-1260331
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Saw this today about Southwark voting in support of a tourist tax in the borough  BBC News - Tourist tax visitor levy comes closer in Southwark https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5ypvw0qln7o Makes me wonder what else they can find to tax, maybe a fine for breaking wind, or breathing or even a tax on windows. Of course I am being facetious but it does feel like if it moves, they will tax it. 
    • Politicians particularly so....remember it's always party before people! I doubt McAsh will be in cabinet much longer...he might find even more attempts to kneecap his political career. I wonder if he might have to move to another area and restart - he obviously has political ambition but it seems Southwark is not going to be where it blossoms anymore - unless he can manage some sort of coup.  
    • You could attend the next edf drinks    https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/360548-ed-forum-drinks/page/3/#comments
    • Hi Sue, they were not local solicitors. Andrea’s was based in Wales and the other firms involved were large nationwide conveyancing companies (rather than conventional high street solicitors). I’m happy to advise clients and buyers privately on what I believe to be their shortcomings but I don’t think doing so in public on the forum would be appropriate, particularly as they are not locally based. My general advice would always be to steer clear of the big conveyancing companies as they are, in my experience, notoriously difficult to contact when the need arises and the case handler is often not a fully qualified solicitor and so issues have to be referred upwards to “technical teams” internally, which was part of the problem in Andrea’s chain. Tony
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...