Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Well....I think the panel seem to be a lot better.....and liking Gary Barlow very much (he is way too good looking). They seem to be only putting through people who can on the whole sing though (which makes a change).


Will be interesting to see what they are like at the mentoring stage. I think Kelly Rowland is going to be really good. She'll make them work hard.

Nice post Nette; you nailed it, you made it your own, that's what this forum is all about, you owned the thread, when I first saw the thread title I thought oh-oh... but then you really delivered, and people wonder if this forum has any validity in the modern world - well I'd just tell them to read that post, you had this whole forum on its feet, I've read threads like this a million times but that was really something special, I'm looking forward to seeing more posts in the coming weeks - you're going through to Lond -oops!

That about sums up how I feel maxxi though I don't watch the show. Nette is a class act. Did I ever tell you someone once said they thought I was like Louis. I was somewhat confused until it was explained to me it wasn't Jungle Book Louis. LOL


Huh.....just checked up on what I'd written. Better avoid that in future.



lol It's original definition was "Laughing out loud" (also written occasionally as "Lots of Laughs"), used as a brief acronym to denote great amusement in chat conversations.


Now, it is overused to the point where nobody laughs out loud when they say it. In fact, they probably don't even give a shit about what you just wrote. More accurately, the acronym "lol" should be redefined as "Lack of laughter."


Depending on the chatter, its definition may vary. The list of its meanings includes, but is not limited to:

1) "I have nothing worthwhile to contribute to this conversation."

2) "I'm too lazy to read what you just wrote so I'm typing something useless in hopes that you'll think I'm still paying attention."

3) "Your statement lacks even the vaguest trace of humor but I'll pretend I'm amused."

4) "This is a pointless acronym I'm sticking in my sentence just because it's become so engraved into my mind that when chatting, I MUST use the meaningless sentence-filler 'lol.'"

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Nice post Nette; you nailed it, you made it your

> own, that's what this forum is all about, you

> owned the thread, when I first saw the thread

> title I thought oh-oh... but then you really

> delivered, and people wonder if this forum has any

> validity in the modern world - well I'd just tell

> them to read that post, you had this whole forum

> on its feet, I've read threads like this a million

> times but that was really something special, I'm

> looking forward to seeing more posts in the coming

> weeks - you're going through to Lond -oops!



I know, i'm brilliant.


But sorry to say ( as you're somewhat behind the curve ) I can't take you through to the next round.


So it's back to your day job fitting tyres and shock absorbers at Kwik-Fit.


Nette(tu)



p.s. I know you're watching really & if moos digs the show/thread, then the world is okay with me .

Dear northlondoner, if you're going to post snobbish comments about vulgar telly you really ought to spell paean correctly. Of course it's garish, hypocritical, sentimental, manipulative, totally fixed crap! That's its charm. If you eat a kebab, you can't complain it's not a fillet steak.


Love

Moos (oik)

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dear northlondoner, if you're going to post

> snobbish comments about vulgar telly you really

> ought to spell paean correctly. Of course it's

> garish, hypocritical, sentimental, manipulative,

> totally fixed crap! That's its charm. If you eat


> a kebab, you can't complain it's not a fillet

> steak.



Ouch! Good point M. Back of the class for me. *slopes off shame faced*


>

> Love

> Moos (oik)

Frankito Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't even know what paean means...! I am fik!



Not at all, here is the dictionary definition...


1. An unpleasant sensation occurring in varying degrees of severity to a geordie as a consequence of injury, disease, or emotional disorder.

2. Suffering or distress of a geordie.

3. paeans The pangs of geordie childbirth.

4. paeans Great care or effort on behalf of geordie: take paeans with one's work.

5. Informal A source of annoyance; a nuisance.

v. paeaned, paean?ing, paeans

Annette Curtain Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I know, i'm brilliant.

>

> But sorry to say ( as you're somewhat behind the

> curve ) I can't take you through to the next

> round.

>

> So it's back to your day job fitting tyres and

> shock absorbers at Kwik-Fit.

>

> Nette(tu)



Too late - turns out you CAN get better...



http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTKT3b3tgzdJGCX5TE2TrPWHejjIbHE4DcW670RFvv4TGMIlTflnA

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • bizarre responses from everyone but Cancerian 🤷🏾‍♀️ As an LL resident surely a perfectly normal enquiry in that one might wish to know who to look out for if lawless/feral kids are wreaking havoc? any distinguishing marks on the perpetrators? presumably the objection is that a physical description might reveal the alleged culprits as non-white? (nothing else makes sense with this bourgeois over-sensitivity). same botched thinking that causes police descriptions of suspects on the loose to omit this info  (top way to protect the public / solve the crime) FYI i'm a mixed-race female and interested in THE TRUTH. hence, i want to protect myself & my family against criminals. so please DESCRIBE the physical appearance of criminals or suspected criminals to help to keep us safe. thankyou.  "underlying agenda... strange" 😂😂😂 strange agenda to wish to be safe in my community. well played 🤯   working the nightshift here & getting mildly obsessed/infuriated with the peculiar responses. someone please explain how wishing to be able to attempt to identify, physically, the perpetrator(s) of an alleged local assault is "strange", with an "agenda"? God help us. (wait... "God"? must be a far-right religious maniac) "Unless there were distinctive features such as unusual clothing, how is that going to identify them"... green & purple mohican with accompanying buffalo 🦬 horns through the nose might do it; or simply hairstyle, skin colour, sartorial outfit... 🤔 "and even if it did, what would be the point, without photographic evidence that they had done anything wrong?" eyewitness reports? 😏    
    • Unless they were wearing school uniform with name tags otherwise children do change their clothes you know. 
    • I'd also recommend Silvano for anyone in the area looking to learn automatic, having just passed first time with 5 minors. He's a very patient teacher and ensured I learned how to drive safely above all. 
    • You don't need to do the research. I had to know the numbers as a TV buyer. I analysed the potential advertising revenue and Channel Four didn't cover their costs. They had some nice 'Channel Four' signs when someone hit the ropes but, In all honesty, a lot a potential revenue was lost because most old knackers were pissed off because they couldn't perve at Carol Vorderman on 'Countdown'.       Sorry, cross-post. I was replying to Malumbu. Give me a minute, if you will. I listened to the first two sessions (today) on TMS and popped down to the pub for the evening one.   I do miss the days of Peter West, Richie Benaud and Tom Graveney on BBC2.   But, the BBC are at least putting on 'Today At The Test' on at around 7pm instead of after midnight.   And it was on the 10pm news.      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...