Jump to content

Recommended Posts

15 or so pupils from Harris were gathered in the street near me on Friday afternoon for some sort of (apparently) pre-arranged fight between 2 of them. They proceeded to get into a fairly brutal fight in the middle of the road while the others cheered them from the side-lines. I am planning on reporting this to staff at Harris and was wondering whether anyone had any experience of contacting the school on something like this and could suggest who might be best to speak to (i.e. someone who might take it reasonably seriously). Thanks


Update - I thought I would post something by way of update to say that the School did indeed take this seriously and not only responded very quickly to my contacting them, but dealt with the matter in a timely and efficient manner. The HT and safer schools liaison also helpfully explained to me what they had/were doing to address the issue with the individuals concerned). I thought it only fair to mention this by way of update, so that any parents of children at the school can be assured that it was dealt with effectively and in a very professional manner.

Sounds like you did all the right things. The reason I asked the question is, would the police not automatically contact the school?



dulwichbloke Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes, of course I did. By the time the van and car

> load of police arrived they had moved on - the

> Police went off looking for them (but I suspect

> not for long, as it was a busy time of day).

bodsier Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What would the consequences be for under 18s

> fighting? Would they get a criminal record?


They would likely, at worst, for fighting without knives, get a youth rehabilitation order, which is regarded as "spent" six months after the end of the order. And unless anyone was seriously hurt they're most likely to get a youth caution, which is "spent" as soon as issued.

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is this just your classic school scrap then with

> everybody clustering round to watch (and once

> someone goes down it's over) or is it worse.


Yes - initially looked a bit heavy handed to get the police involved, to me. But then with knife crime so prevalent, best to do so.


Assuming it was just a fight, suggestions of a criminal record are laughable.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes - initially looked a bit heavy handed to get

> the police involved, to me. But then with knife

> crime so prevalent, best to do so.

>

> Assuming it was just a fight, suggestions of a

> criminal record are laughable.


The Police were only called because one boy was knocked over twice by punches in the space of about a minute, the second time hitting his head (loudly) on the kerb. It wasn't stopping, so I was concerned someone might get properly injured if it carried on.


As for criminal convictions/records, I never raised that as a possibility (and I don't think it is). I would have thought it is now a School matter (together with the Safer Schools PC liaison). Now it's over, what I am hoping is that those concerned are discouraged from having serious punch-ups in my street. While some might like to describe it (almost sentimentally) as "just your classic school scrap", my young children don't need to be frightened by seeing violence like that on their doorstep, nor do they need to witness 15 (to them, very big) kids shouting, swearing and being aggressive towards each other. Indeed, several passing school kids (who were not involved) looked positively terrified by it.


So, no, it was a rather nasty fight and very unpleasant to see, but nothing like as serious as a street robbery or GBH.

"Just a fight" at a school I briefly taught at resulted in one boy hitting his head on a wall after being punched, ending up in a long coma with permanent cognitive damage, and with his assailant going into youth custody. So my advice would be, if you don't feel qualified to break it up yourself (and in most cases, especially nowadays, it's probably inadvisable), do call the police, you might stop several lives being ruined. Pre-arranged fights outside school aren't the same as schoolyard larks and scraps, they're a serious business and need to be taken seriously by the public, the police and, if needs be, the courts. If nothing else, if kids don't learn this is a serious business now, they'll carry this behaviour into adulthood, only with higher stakes and heavier weapons.


Sorry, pompous I know but I do feel quite strongly it shouldn't be seen as "just kids" - I've seen firsthand how this stuff can quickly escalate into very serious shit indeed.

dulwichbloke Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Yes - initially looked a bit heavy handed to

> get

> > the police involved, to me. But then with knife

> > crime so prevalent, best to do so.

> >

> > Assuming it was just a fight, suggestions of a

> > criminal record are laughable.

>

> The Police were only called because one boy was

> knocked over twice by punches in the space of

> about a minute, the second time hitting his head

> (loudly) on the kerb. It wasn't stopping, so I was

> concerned someone might get properly injured if it

> carried on.

>

> As for criminal convictions/records, I never

> raised that as a possibility (and I don't think it

> is). I would have thought it is now a School

> matter (together with the Safer Schools PC

> liaison). Now it's over, what I am hoping is that

> those concerned are discouraged from having

> serious punch-ups in my street. While some might

> like to describe it (almost sentimentally) as

> "just your classic school scrap", my young

> children don't need to be frightened by seeing

> violence like that on their doorstep, nor do they

> need to witness 15 (to them, very big) kids

> shouting, swearing and being aggressive towards

> each other. Indeed, several passing school kids

> (who were not involved) looked positively

> terrified by it.

>

> So, no, it was a rather nasty fight and very

> unpleasant to see, but nothing like as serious as

> a street robbery or GBH.


School scraps stopped when one went down in my memory (and others would stop it if it didn't) - and they were normally at the back of a school field (so softer landing)

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "Just a fight" at a school I briefly taught at

> resulted in one boy hitting his head on a wall

> after being punched, ending up in a long coma with

> permanent cognitive damage, and with his assailant

> going into youth custody. So my advice would be,

> if you don't feel qualified to break it up

> yourself (and in most cases, especially nowadays,

> it's probably inadvisable), do call the police,

> you might stop several lives being ruined.

> Pre-arranged fights outside school aren't the same

> as schoolyard larks and scraps, they're a serious

> business and need to be taken seriously by the

> public, the police and, if needs be, the courts.

> If nothing else, if kids don't learn this is a

> serious business now, they'll carry this behaviour

> into adulthood, only with higher stakes and

> heavier weapons.

>

> Sorry, pompous I know but I do feel quite strongly

> it shouldn't be seen as "just kids" - I've seen

> firsthand how this stuff can quickly escalate into

> very serious shit indeed.





That's why I asked the question Mic mac, and didn't assume anything........the OP Described it as 'brutal' not at all laughable is it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson rather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...