Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I am curious as to which bit though.

That the press reporting of the case has been sensationalist, that our opinions are by and large influenced by our exposure to that reporting, or that the Knox issue of FHM will be sizzling?

Just for clarity like.

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > You do talk some b******ks some times.

>

> Christ, it's taken you 11,000 posts to notice! I

> just like the introduction of doubt with 'some';

> very flattering and enough to get me off on a

> technicality I reckon ;-P



You can talk total bollocks some of the time

You can talk some bollocks all of the time

But nobody can talk as much bollocks as ______________*




*NewNexus/richardbach/AFN etc. - delete as appropriate or insert preferred name here.

She seems to be guilty of being pretty, little else.


What is slowly coming out is a more objective assessment of the evidence against her (and the already forgotten ex-Boyfriend), there was little evidence, in fact, none. Any evidence was circumstantial that fitted a pattern, if you wanted her guilty. It also fitted other patterns, but that was ignored.

Good to see the mood on the thread changing - the first few posts seemed to be convicting Knox on the grounds of being a saucepot (sexy female - stamp!) and an American (evil Westerner), which was bizarre.


The evidence against her was shaky to say the least. I agree very much with Simon M.

Two people were acquitted yesterday. Two people now face an appeal. I will bet the last pound in my pocket that not one of you can find a front page photo just of Raffaelle Sollecito. A better example of profound sexism in the press in this country I have not seen in a long time.


Plus ca change, girls.

legalbeagle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I will bet the last pound in

> my pocket that not one of you can find a front

> page photo just of Raffaelle Sollecito.


You'd expect it from The Sun or Fox News... I was (probably naively) surprised the BBC/Guardian/Telegraph/etc have stooped so low.

Sloppy policing at best. They developed an early theory and then twisted any evidence they could find to prove that theory.


They found a knife in the Boyfriend's draw that was covered in Knox's DNA ... ignoring the fact that there was no sign of the victim's DNA and she (poor soul) had her throat, ignoring the fact that the kinfe was used to prep veg by Knox so of course it had her DNA on it, ignoring the fact that it was a random knife pulled from a kitchen draw by the police with no clear link to the murder.


The video evidence of Knox and Boyfriend kissing and cuddling in an "inappropriate" manner. Really? I saw the video evidence on the news, it looked like 2 traumatised kids conforting each other, there was nothing erotic or inappropriate about it.


It was a terrible stitch up by the police and the media are, yet again, guilty of leaping on board the band-wagon without any proper analysis of fact.

Michael Palaeologus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> The video evidence of Knox and Boyfriend kissing

> and cuddling in an "inappropriate" manner. Really?

> I saw the video evidence on the news, it looked

> like 2 traumatised kids conforting each other,

> there was nothing erotic or inappropriate about

> it.

>



She was also filmed performing the splits and doing cartwheels..bit odd when your friend and flatmate has just had her throat slit wouldn't you think? She also lied about and tried to frame her former boss and bar owner Patrick Lumamba..who was subsequently released and is now (or has already sued) suing her for defamation. If you're really innocent why lie??

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am curious as to which bit though.

> That the press reporting of the case has been

> sensationalist, that our opinions are by and large

> influenced by our exposure to that reporting, or

> that the Knox issue of FHM will be sizzling?

> Just for clarity like.


Ok, this bit...


I think we all end up going on gut feeling fed by

> the baser instincts of news mongers.


Bit of a generalisation that.


As for the Amanda Knox FHM issue, nothing surprises me but don't cancel your subscription ;-)

Is doing the splits and cartwheels illegal in Italy?


Amanda Knox. I find you guilty of doing the splits and cartwheels.. and 'acting funny' at other times, maybe, depending on which picture of the 6000 we took today looks the oddest and therefore gets published. You are hereby sentenced to twenty-six years in prison.

She was convicted of slander for that one.


Toi be vaguely sensible for a moment (boo hiss) I get Huggers' point that there may be something of the Barry George fantasist about her, but she's no simmpleton and her behaviour was a really weird reaction to having your mate so horribly killed in the room next to you.


I'm afraid I can't be as confidence as her defenders on here that it's all quite so clear cut, and it's that residual doubt which made me feel uneasy, particularly seeing how much the Kerchers were suffering and continue to lack closure on this. If iit's so obvious that the knife was a random one from a drawer then how were the jury not persuaded of reasonable doubt when it's so blindingly obvious to the more enlightened among us.


And apologies to those who thought i thought she was guilty becuase she's a bit saucy or that my flippancy was distasteful, I'll remember to put the tags around it all next time, just to make it clear like.


Fair point Camberwell, just me that isn't immune to the morass of specualtion and sensationalism in the press, luckily most people read court transcripts and nothing else ;-)

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is doing the splits and cartwheels illegal in

> Italy?

>

> Amanda Knox. I find you guilty of doing the splits

> and cartwheels.. and 'acting funny' at other

> times, maybe, depending on which picture of the

> 6000 we took today looks the oddest and therefore

> gets published. You are hereby sentenced to

> twenty-six years in prison.



read the post properly..didn't say it was illegal but it's NOT sane behaviour when your pal has just been killed..in fact it's pretty disturbing and damn right insulting.

Slightly more disturbing is seeing two people getting convicted for murder, not as a result of any real evidence, but because they act 'a bit funny' - and (spurred on by the press, foaming at the mouth as ever) everyone buys into the fantasy, because the fantasy is more interesting than anything proven by the facts.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here is another article from the excellent Special Needs Jungle with tips for responses to the SEND conversation survey. Including shoe horning in EHCPs which they "forget" to ask a question about in the conversation. And living as we do in Southwark with the huge misfortune of 100% academy secondary schools, some thoughts on this and how unlikely inclusion in mainstream is within the current education landscape. In my view the government could save money by creating some smaller mainstream secondary schools for kids who can cope in primary school but not  with the scale of secondary, and need a calmer less busy setting. The funding would have to be different - it is currently on a per pupil basis which favours larger schools. But it would undoubtedly be cheaper than specialist provision, and the huge cost to individual children and families (emotional and financial) and to society. https://www.specialneedsjungle.com/tips-help-complete-governments-send-conversation-survey-law/ If anyone wants to take a radical step to help their struggling child, my tip is to move far away: these are the best two schools I have ever visited and in a beautiful part of the country. I only wish we'd moved there before it was too late for my son who had to suffer multiple failings at Charter North and then at the hands of Southwark SEND, out of education from February to October in year 10-11, having already suffered the enduring trauma of a very difficult early life, which in combination with ADHD made his time at schools which just don't care so very unbearable for all of us. https://www.cartmelprioryschool.co.uk/ https://settlebeck.org/ As an add on, I would say to anybody considering adoption, please take into account the education battles that you are very much more likely to face than the average parent. First you have schools to deal with, already terrible; then being passed from pillar to post within Southwark Education, SEND, Education Inclusion Team, round and round as they all do their best to explain why they are not responsible and you need someone different, let's hold another multi-agency meeting, never for one minute considering that if they put the child at the centre and used common sense they would achieve a lot more in much less time without loads of Southwark employees sitting in endless meetings with long suffering parents. It is hard to fully imagine this at the start of your adoption journey, full of hope as you are, but truly education is not for the faint hearted, and should be factored into your decision. You'll never hear from people who are really struggling and continue to do so, only from those who've had challenges but overcome them and it's all lovely. And education, the very people who should be there to help, are the ones who make your lives the most hellish out of everything your child and you face.
    • It’s a big problem all over London. I’ve seen it happen in Kennington and Bloomsbury in the last year. I think there has been some progress recently with some key arrests, but you do need to be very careful when walking around with your phone out, especially, as you say, if wearing noise cancelling headphones. Sorry you experienced this 
    • Luke Johnson (prominent director and co-owner), supported Brexit and backed the Vote Leave campaign. He also described the response to Covid as ‘a campaign of fear’ and 2020 funded a media consultant for the ‘Covid-recovery group’ of anti-lockdown MPs.
    • I'm a bit of an architecture geek and I must confess I find it one of the most gimmicky ugly redesigns I've seen in a while. I'm always open to quirky but this is just not nice in any way shape or form.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...