Jump to content

living costs at uni


Dan-Mei

Recommended Posts

When my daughter was at University I gave her ?400 a month to cover all her living costs including travel and clothing and I believe other families had similar arrangements.

She also picked up casual work at weekends and during the holidays.

Student loan still huge with course fees alone!

Hope your child enjoys the experience and good luck with the next stage in their life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rather depends where she will be studying, but Which recently published this helpful article: https://university.which.co.uk/advice/student-finance/whats-the-average-cost-of-living-at-university


Which also has a budget tool.


A lot of universities give guidance on their websites about local living cost estimates. for example see these search results - https://www.google.com/search?q=student+living+costs+in+hall&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-ab

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also depends on what parents earn (parents have to submit past and present earnings etc to Student Finance England)so that will reflect on a student's Maintenance Loan which is the money they will have paid directly into their bank account by Student Finance to live on i.e. rent, food, drink (odd bottle of vodka)!, toiletries, going out, clothes, etc. My daughter graduated last year (July 2017) and managed to keep her food/drink bills to around ?20 per week by shopping at Aldi and Lidl but that had to be topped up regularly by parents!


I have other children who graduated in 2014 but that was when the ?3,000 odd Student Loan was in operation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes womanofdulwich, that?s what most of us thought!

My daughter went to university in 2012 which was the first year the tuition fees escalated to ?3000 a term.

We were fully prepared to support her with cost of living as stated above and she went to Cardiff where living costs are reasonable.

We didn?t take out the old fashioned?student loan? because we didn?t want her to graduate with debt but can appreciate a lot of parents can?t.

Her student debt is still in excess of ?35,000 and growing at 6% a year. If we were unable to support her financially it would be nearer ?50,000!

She?s back in London and enjoying her life and working but gosh, who wants that amount of debt?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My youngest is in her second year at university and has just received her statement about how much she will receive in maintenance loan for the next academic year. This is from Student Finance. Her maintenance loan just about covers her rent and bills she will be paying in a house share for her and student friends.


Her Tuition Fee Loan of ?9,250 is of course paid directly to the university for her course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have offered ?100 pm towards my granddaughter's costs - her rent is ?140 per week in halls and she is awaiting details from Leeds as to how much maintenance grant she will get from Leeds uni.


We contributed around ?1000 a year when her mother and aunt went to uni . My 32 year old despite having a part time job and 2 children is till paying off her student loan. Her older sister eventually replayed her loan after 20 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't think you can buy an apartment in UK with

> a loan from a broker - you need a deposit and

> mortgage.

> Uni fees in Europe are much less than UK as well


that is not a genuine post- it is phishing- as is the one after yours.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi Everyone … I've been a cleaner for 17 years, I work punctually and responsibly, leaving  your home is clean and organized. The experience includes: *Private Houses *High cleaning standards. *Ironing  *Deep Cleaner  *5 star Airbnb    Send me a message and booking a  trial. And get a DISCOUNT 😀 📲07889693871 (WhatsApp Just)   Thanks  Gra
    • Ok here goes.....   Since day 1 of the LTNs the emergency services have been very clear - blocked roads increase response times. Southwark councillors were more than aware of this from the beginning of the LTN debacle during Covid because, when the council were going LTN mad and were trying to carpet bomb them everywhere they had suggested one for Peckham Rye and had initiated a consultation. As usual they took glowing endorsements of their proposal to close parts of Peckham Rye from the cycle lobby but got negative feedback from TFL and the emergency services due to the disruption their physical closure barriers were going to have - the emergency services made their preference clear that they do not like physical barriers. Needless to say Southwark ignored that emergency service input and pushed ahead with their plans only to cancel them when the realised LTNs were turning residents against them.   Now the video below (from March 2021) is interesting from a couple of perspectives: 1) Clearly LAS were making their feelings on permanent closures very clear to Southwark - please scroll to 1 hour 4 minutes to hear from them - 51 of the 170 delays caused by LTNs in London were in Southwark - yet it took over a year for emergency vehicles to be given access and, if I remember correctly FOIs showed that LAS had been writing to Dale Foden and the council alerting them to the delays. So why the delay and why is there a constant narrative from local lobby groups that the junction has to be closed to ALL traffic (including emergency vehicles) and why the new designs return to a partial full closure of the junction - most rational and pragmatic people can surely see that the compromise installed in 2022 to allow emergency vehicle access was the most sensible approach.   The council put the desires of local lobby groups ahead of the emergency services...which is madness...and then that leads us to point 2)....   2) Notice the presence of Jeremy Leach on the call - not a councillor but the Co-Optee of the council's environmental scrutiny committee and he is constantly pushing the councillors to do more to deal with traffic issues and reduce traffic. I suspect he is deemed one of the "expert" voices the council was turning to for guidance at this period. But, much like the activist researchers the council turned to Jeremy is very much an "activist expert" and was chair of the London Living Streets, co-founder of Action Vision Zero and part of Southwark Cyclists - so you can see why if the council was taking guidance and direction from him how they may have not been making decisions in the public interest. Clearly someone has convinced the council that the junction needs to be closed to all vehicles as there cannot be any other explanation for why they held out for so long (that created increased response times) - remember they are wasting another £1.5m to close one arm of the roads permanently again - honestly if someone wants to enlighten me to a part of this story I am missing then feel free but to me it looks like something very odd has been going on at the DV junction and the council is ignoring the majority and listening to the few...   https://lrscconference.org.uk/index.php/agenda-speakers/jeremy-leach-co-founder-action-vision-zero/     No it was 64% of the total who lived in the consultation area - 57% when the council looked at all the respondents to the consultation.   3,162 (64%) wanted it returned to its original state 823 (17%) wanted it retained as was 422 (8%) wanted a different measure installed 564 (11%) wanted the measure, but modify/ enhance it with other features   So back then the 11% got their wish!   In every consultation in relation to the DV junction there has been overwhelming rejection of the council's plans by local residents - yet they carry-on wasting our money on it regardless - just who are they trying to placate?
    • Calton was particularly hideous. An ambulance wouldn’t have got anywhere fast.   
    • Not clear what point you are trying to make here Earl? A majority of those consulted wanted measures returned to their original state. Majority is the salient point. Again, if consultations are pretty irrelevent, as you seem to suggest, then why do oragnisations like Southwark Cyclists repeatedly prompt their members, whether local to the consultation area or not, to respond to consultations on CPZ or LTNs. What a waste of everyone's time if of no import in terms of local policy-making.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...