Jump to content

Recommended Posts

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No need Netty, FIFA have said a Poppy can be worn

> on the black armband...



The black arm band ?


What black frikkin armband.


( oh & I half expect at least one of the team to have a poppy tattoo by tomorrow )

Aren't there more important things to worry about like the state of the Greek and Italian economies, or did we fight two world wars to stop us going into the Euro.


I was pleased to see Benjamin Zephania wearing a white poppy on Question Time, so perhaps the England team should wear a white poppy against a white shirt.


Odd that the title of the thread is about Fifa hating out way of life. My mate went to the England Wales match, it kicked off betweeen Northern fans and Southern fans outside, then many of the England fans spent much of the match making sheep noises at the Welsh supporters. Can tell me what there is to like about this?

Would set a worrying precedent, not been done before so why now (see other thread on Poppies for evidence of Poppy fascism) . For once I'm with the corrupt old tin pots from FIFA. AND...hasn't Dave 'bandwagon' Cameron got more pressing concerns than wasting time on this?

I find the pressure to conform on poppy wearing a bit sinister and the hysteria seems to be increasing every year.


It's not a co-incidence that jingoism and xenophobia increase in most countries during times of serious economic downturn, with some frightening end results in the past.


The enforced 'patriotism' of poppy wearing is alarming in this context.

LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I find the pressure to conform on poppy wearing a

> bit sinister and the hysteria seems to be

> increasing every year.

>

> It's not a co-incidence that jingoism and

> xenophobia increase in most countries during times

> of serious economic downturn, with some

> frightening end results in the past.

>

> The enforced 'patriotism' of poppy wearing is

> alarming in this context.


I wear a poppy, not because I feel pressurised or through a sense of patriotism, I do it because I rather hope that it will help us to remember the sacrifice made by men and women of the armed forces. We all have a choice. Nobody forces to wear, or buy one if you don't want to.


Edited due to rubbish spelling.

Is Fifa right to stand against political symbolism in football? Yes


Is wearing a Poppy a sign of political symbolism? Probably not. Wars are evil and all of the dead, whatever their nationalities, should be remembered for their sacrifices. Better for FIFA to stand against all wars and violence.


Does Fifa hates the British way of life? No.


Does Fifa hates England? Of course they bloody do. Give us the bloomin' world cup.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Was that the Hare Krishna place? I can't remember exactly where it was (or maybe still is) but it was somewhere around Oxford Street.
    • The "for sale" section on this forum lets people offer things for free or cheaply. And the "wanted" section let's people ask for things they want or need, for free or cheaply. There are also existing schemes like Freecycle, and also local  food banks. And there is (or was) a local scheme where you can bring things to be repaired free. I think it is/was based in Nunhead. Isn't that simpler than having a barter system? You might have something to give away, but the person who wants it might not have anything you want. Or have I misunderstood how it works? I can see that offering services free might not fit into existing schemes, but depending on what they were, what would happen if things went horribly wrong eg someone wrecked your house? Sorry if the above sounds very negative. 
    • I'm wondering why they would do that? Because surely positive reviews could only help them, and if they thought they might get negative reviews, shouldn't they have been addressing the reasons that might be (unless someone had an unwarranted grudge against them)? But in any case, how could they have stopped people posting reviews on here? PS I have corrected your typo! 😃
    • Agreed. Just stating as a historic fact they tried to stiffle reviews.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...