Jump to content

Recommended Posts

the-e-dealer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well UKIP is a bit of a refuge and rag bag. Just

> wondered what kind of UKIP type you are. Sounds

> like you are anti Europe but not an Ugly dog

> (thats the dog not you) owning forenger hating

> skinhead! Which is good though I am not anti

> Europe but anti the Euro!



Wow nice looking = "UGLY" dog we know the meaning again ! Who said That the Latins or the Europeans maybe they are blind.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/20679-hi/page/2/#findComment-503108
Share on other sites

Karter


He has had threads deleted in the last week


The fact that he keeps getting banned (double figures now?) suggests a bigger problem. Me saying you admire him because you like "the entertainment value" is absolutely nothing to do with "all about me". How many people get banned that often? And you want them around for entertainment value? That's about you

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/20679-hi/page/2/#findComment-503588
Share on other sites

Come on Karter.


The Wolf was vicarious car crash entertainment


Now he's become a boring-internet-mouth-cheese-nutter


And sailing further and further from his anchor on reality


He's proved his point, trouble is he's the only one that doesn't realise that.


Yes, he comes back & for a while he's a glace' cherry in a sea of blanc-mange.


Like a meal at Harvester, same shite- many ways.





NETTE:-S

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/20679-hi/page/2/#findComment-503605
Share on other sites

Karter, I used to kind of enjoy BBW, and thought his first banning, or maybe two, were harsh. However, a person can only be warned so many tines, and rather than reigning it in, he indulged in it, and has become nout but an offensive troll


Strafer had to moderate a lot of that shit before he handed over the reigns, and has every right to feel strongly about this.


No idea why you've kicked off on this thread, but to be honest, you're looking a bit silly.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/20679-hi/page/2/#findComment-503612
Share on other sites

Crikey, these multiple Wolf sitings are making me nervous. It's a bit like that John Carpenter movie , the Thing, where a malignant alien nestles inside apparently normal people before unveiling its ghastly fanged and tentacled form. Whoa .... any of us could be the Wolf. Someone should come up with a test ....
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/20679-hi/page/2/#findComment-504266
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s a 4 year old on a bike do you really think he is going 15mph. Grown adults complaining about a child who probably isn’t able to string a few sentences together says a lot about the people in this forum. If this member was hit from behind the father was probably walking behind the bike so I don’t get the point of stretching out an overreaction from a child in Nursery bumping into you. Grow up Obviously a four year old should be cycling on the pavement.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • Completely jobless and lunatic behaviour coming on a forum and complaining about a 4 year old and the child’s bike riding skills. Honestly grow up
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...