Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It is a shame that admin feel the need to delete threads, such as the recent anti-semitism and DJKQ v Sue thread. I know these were controversial subjects but lets face it we all enjoyed the cringe worthy ding-dong between these malcontent women. Cowboy builders and their hapless victims are a modern scourge of society yet I likened their spat to something from the Jeremy Kyle show: humiliating, embarassing but addictively entertaining.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/20700-killjoys/
Share on other sites

That and the fact that the majority of Sue's claims were slanderous. Paul please leave it now. I'm no cowboy and twenty years of work (not to mention TV documentary and photographic evidence in this case) can vouch for that. The claims of one unhinged woman (who complains about everything and everyone she ever seems to pay for a service) should not be taken for any kind of truth. I have been very restrained in response to her outrageous behaviour (both at the time and now). There are legal protections against defamation and slander. Admin are fully aware of that.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/20700-killjoys/#findComment-503242
Share on other sites

PaulK Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It is a shame that admin feel the need to delete

> threads, such as the recent anti-semitism and DJKQ

> v Sue thread. I know these were controversial

> subjects but lets face it we all enjoyed the

> cringe worthy ding-dong between these malcontent

> women. Cowboy builders and their hapless victims

> are a modern scourge of society yet I likened

> their spat to something from the Jeremy Kyle show:

> humiliating, embarassing but addictively

> entertaining.


Here we go again! Is this why you keep starting new threads about it?

Is there any great barrier for people that would like to see that type of content on a forum from starting their own one?


I also think its pretty rude to call people killjoys when they're the ones that have to make decisions over how this place is run and have invested their own time in doing so.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/20700-killjoys/#findComment-503252
Share on other sites

You ask Paul to leave it now but go into another spiel about an 'unhinged' woman. Do you medical evidence for this? Do you know what it implies? You can hardly call your approach as being 'restrained'. Why should you be believed any more than the other party when within a matter of hours of stating you would only post on your footie thread, you were posting elsewhere. Hardly a woman of her word.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/20700-killjoys/#findComment-503253
Share on other sites

It is a shame Admin because this is the most interesting and stimulating topic that has been on this forum for months. If you want this to be a sterile and 'nice' environment just carry on deleting anything remotely edgy and controversial. For the record I think Sue sounds very demanding, fickle and unreasonable.



I believe DJKQ.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/20700-killjoys/#findComment-503319
Share on other sites

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Paulk = suspect

>

>

> Yeah, I said it

>

> ("but that's not very welcoming to a newcomer, so

> cliquey!")

>

> Newcomer my arse



More like Paula K I think.


It all reads a bit familiar/similar "non" ?


Jeez a kipper tied to a hot radiator for two weeks smells better.


NETTE:-S

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/20700-killjoys/#findComment-503364
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • "That’s very insulting! You are basically calling 17 million people that voted to leave the EU ‘thick’. " I'm certainly calling them wrong. And many of those 17 million agree with me now and have expressed regret. Many others were indeed thick, and remain so. You can see them being interviewed all the time. As for insulting, the losing side in that referendum have being called every name under the sun "enemies of the people" etc etc - so spare me the tears about being insulted But for clarity. there is a certain type of individual who even now thinks Brexit was a good idea, tends to side with Trump and holds views about immigrants - and yes I am happy to calll those people thick. - and even worse Jazzer posts a long and sometimes correct post about the failings of modern parties. I myself think labour are woefully underperforming. But equally it has been less than a year after 14 years of mismanagement and despite some significant errors have largely steadied the ship. You only have to speak to other  countries to recognise the improvement there. They have cut NHS waiting times, and the upside of things like NI increases is higher minimum wage - something hard-bitten voters should appreciate. They were accused of being too gloomy when they came in and yet simultaneously people are accusing them of promising the earth and failing to deliver - both of those can't be true at the same time Fact is, this country repeatedly, over 15 years, voted for austerity and self-damaging policies like Brexit despite all warnings - this newish govt now have to pick up the pieces and there are no easy solutions. Voters say "we just want honest politicians" - ok, we have some bad news about the economy and the next few years  - "no no not that kind of honesty!!! - magic some solutions up now!" Anyone who considers voting for Reform because they don't represent existing parties and want "change" is being criminally negligent in ignoring their dog-whistles, their lack of diligence in vetting, their lack of attendance (in Westminster now and in eu parties is guises past) and basically making all of the same mistakes when they pushed for Brexit - basically, not serious people   "cost of things in the shops and utility bills keep on rising, the direct opposite of what they promised." - can we see that promise? I don't recall it? Because whatever voters or govts want, the cost of things is not exactly entirely in their gift. People were warned prices would rise with Brexit and e were told "we don't care - it's a price worth paying!". Turns out that isn' really true now is it - people DO care about the cost of things (and of course there are other factors - covid, trump, tariffs, wars etc.    What the country needs is a serious, mature electorate who take a high level view of priorities and get behind the hard work needed to achieve that. There is zero chance of that happening so we are doomed to repeat failures for years to come, complaining about everything and voting for policies which will make things worse here we have labour 2024 energy manifesto commitments - all of it necessary long term investment - calling for immediate price cuts with no money in the kitty seems unrealistic given all of the economic headwinds   https://www.energy-uk.org.uk/general-election-2024-all-manifesto-energy-pledges/#Labour_Party
    • Regardless of “Blighty” it’s the combination of “we” “R” and “Blighty” we means there is a them  cancerian may or may not recognise a dog whistle.  If he doesn’t, we are trying to point one out.  If he does then they are trying to gaslight us into pretending they are just a lovely fundraising group with no agenda 
    • I’m on Darrell Road and have noticed this recently - your daughters are not alone! It seems to only be at night. Would you agree? High pitched and consistent. I’ve been wondering if it’s a street lamp, or a fox deterrent system.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...