Killjoys

[PaulK]

It is a shame that admin feel the need to delete threads, such as the recent anti-semitism and DJKQ v Sue thread. I know these were controversial subjects but lets face it we all enjoyed the cringe worthy ding-dong between these malcontent women. Cowboy builders and their hapless victims are a modern scourge of society yet I likened their spat to something from the Jeremy Kyle show: humiliating, embarassing but addictively entertaining.

[Otta]

I agree that it was car crash reading, but surely you can see why admin had to draw a line under it.

The anti semitism thread was just wrong.

[DJKillaQueen]

That and the fact that the majority of Sue's claims were slanderous. Paul please leave it now. I'm no cowboy and twenty years of work (not to mention TV documentary and photographic evidence in this case) can vouch for that. The claims of one unhinged woman (who complains about everything and everyone she ever seems to pay for a service) should not be taken for any kind of truth. I have been very restrained in response to her outrageous behaviour (both at the time and now). There are legal protections against defamation and slander. Admin are fully aware of that.

[katie1997]

PaulK Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It is a shame that admin feel the need to delete

> threads, such as the recent anti-semitism and DJKQ

> v Sue thread. I know these were controversial

> subjects but lets face it we all enjoyed the

> cringe worthy ding-dong between these malcontent

> women. Cowboy builders and their hapless victims

> are a modern scourge of society yet I likened

> their spat to something from the Jeremy Kyle show:

> humiliating, embarassing but addictively

> entertaining.

Here we go again! Is this why you keep starting new threads about it?

Is there any great barrier for people that would like to see that type of content on a forum from starting their own one?

I also think its pretty rude to call people killjoys when they're the ones that have to make decisions over how this place is run and have invested their own time in doing so.

[Alan Medic]

You ask Paul to leave it now but go into another spiel about an 'unhinged' woman. Do you medical evidence for this? Do you know what it implies? You can hardly call your approach as being 'restrained'. Why should you be believed any more than the other party when within a matter of hours of stating you would only post on your footie thread, you were posting elsewhere. Hardly a woman of her word.

[DJKillaQueen]

Alan......enough.

[Administrator]

They were removed for various reasons, and to spoil your enjoyment wasn't one of them. Please don't dig things up when it's obviously wrong to do so.

[PaulK]

It is a shame Admin because this is the most interesting and stimulating topic that has been on this forum for months. If you want this to be a sterile and 'nice' environment just carry on deleting anything remotely edgy and controversial. For the record I think Sue sounds very demanding, fickle and unreasonable.

I believe DJKQ.

[StraferJack]

Paulk = suspect

Yeah, I said it

("but that's not very welcoming to a newcomer, so cliquey!")

Newcomer my arse

[Alan Medic]

I believe Straferjack.

[Voyageur]

OP, if you can't see the litigation risks around running a website then rather than indulge in this pathetic whinging, set one up of your own where ' anything goes' and carry the risks yourself. Simples.

[Voyageur]

.

[Annette Curtain]

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Paulk = suspect

>

>

> Yeah, I said it

>

> ("but that's not very welcoming to a newcomer, so

> cliquey!")

>

> Newcomer my arse

More like Paula K I think.

It all reads a bit familiar/similar "non" ?

Jeez a kipper tied to a hot radiator for two weeks smells better.

NETTE:-S

[PaulK]

...Aaanyway

Same old fukkin drivel from the same old fukked up losers

[StraferJack]

And yet you keep coming back, making a tit of yourself everytime

[Annette Curtain]

PaulK Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ...Aaanyway

>

> Same old fukkin drivel from the same old fukked up

> losers

Y-EAH

Welcome home Paul-e-poos

NETTE:)-D

[Otta]

PaulK Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ...Aaanyway

>

> Same old fukkin drivel from the same old fukked up

> losers

Oh the irony.

[Jeremy]

> For the record I think Sue sounds very demanding, fickle and unreasonable.

For the record, you sound like a fool.

Have we seen "PaulK" before then?

[northlondoner]

Hmmm. Is this turning out the way you expected Paulk? Check out the metamorphosis thread .