Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I am just wondering what everyone's view is on this. Personally, having recently observed it (on TV) at various stadia (or should that be stadiums?) following the very tragic death of Gary Speed, I actually quite like it. At a stadium anyway, it strikes me as more fitting than the minute's silence. Having said this, I am not so sure how appropriate applause might be, for example, at the Cenotaph.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/20817-the-minutes-applause/
Share on other sites

WW1 2 Minutes Silence


The silence represents the eleventh hour of the eleventh day of the eleventh month in 1918,

when the guns of Europe fell silent.


This silence is marked by the firing of a field gun on Horse Guards Parade to begin and end the silence.


The Silence gives us all a moment to relect on lost commrades and lost family members and is a sign of respect.


I feel that a Minutes Silence should be just that.


Every Individual being able to privately show their Respect and Reflect on there memories of anyone passed on.


Refs Whistle to start and end the Silence


Loud Applause should be used to Break that silence. That would be a nice touch.


Just my view


Fox

Actually most artists and orchestras receive far more than a minutes applause. Conductor usually leaves and reenters the stage at least three times, and then takes time to acknowledge some individual members of the orchestra. When you're sat on stage it's time mostly spent either grinning inanely, patting your colleagues on their back or planning the quickest way to pack up, change and hit the bar before the queue gets big! Best reward after a concert though comes in certain parts of Germany where you are handed a beer as you exit the stage...
And during Funerals when I always have a minute's silence so those with faith can say a silent prayer in their own time, I am often completely overwhelemed when - at the end - there is sometimes and completely unpredictably an applause for the joy given by the life of the person who has died. The length of applause usually relates to how many people are there and the age of the deceased.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...