Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was doing a bit of a Christmas dash through Bromley Glades today when I noticed an eyebrow threading booth type thing. Three ladies were all having their eyebrows done and I noticed that the women doing it were holding the about to be used spare thread in their mouths.


Now I am all for sharing my hubbies toothbrush from time to time and think nothing of taking a swig from my kids drinks etc but they are my nearest and dearest.


Is it really common practice to pay someone to wipe their spit on your eyebrows? Made me shudder.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/21031-unhygienic-eyebrow-threading/
Share on other sites

Mrs TP Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Fluffy I did wonder if it was to hold the thread

> taught and watched for some time and sure enough

> they eventually released the bit in their mouths

> and wound it down to wrap around the eyebrows and

> had a new bit in the mouths - shudder not for me.



What exactly do you think might happen?

I think any risk of anything being transmitted is minimal. You've got more chance of picking up a bug from the doors of public loos since some people don't wash hands even if you do.


From personal experience, they may hold the end of one piece in their mouths or break the thread with their teeth but when they wind it down to start threading, it's the middle (uncontaminated) of the thread that they use. Besides, the thread is only being used on the outside of the body, wrapped round a hair.


It's a bit different from sharing water bottles with 'washback' or double dipping with crudites.

I've no idea what could happen and am not suggesting anything could, just made me squeamish and normally I am quite relaxed with my nearest and dearest just not so with strangers. Also quite surprised to see this is the norm and accepted.


In contrast, I have never tried the whole fish eating your foot thing but am totally relaxed about that but have seen various health concerns re that for humans and the fish.


To Captain Scarlet - eyebrow threading is plucking eyebrow hairs between strands of cotton wound tightly together rather than using tweezers.

There's a lot that doesn't bear thinking about if you look too hard. On a scale of 1 to 10 (one being a bit of spit and ten being Howard Hughes), I can go to about a 3 and remain in my comfort zone. I wouldn't let those pedi-fish anywhere near my toes though. Yuck.


If anyone wants to seriously treat themselves then the absolute QUEEN of the Arch is Shivata at Harrods. Wildly inconvenient (she only works Wednesdays), but she'll have you looking like a movie star in about 7 minutes flat.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Maybe Angelina did see them, however how many people and drivers didn't?  Just takes one to cause life changing for both.  Wouldn't it be more sensible if cyclists realised lights and reflective gear is not just to help them see but to potentially save their lives by making them visible to all. 
    • I agree with this, I'm afraid.  I see it every day within the industry - a lot of it is to do with the fact that the people working in it are younger now and don't realise how much they're being subconsciously indoctrinated by certain forces (social media and group-think), so they're now pathologically incapable of objectivity. Also, they don't read books, pick up the phone to experts, or generally know how to research properly.  On a lot of documentaries I've worked on, I've been leant on hard to peddle narratives that are not only heavily biased, but often outright inaccurate, and I've fought back where I can. It's really depressing,  I'd like to think that, at the BBC, I'd be immune from these influences, and allowed to project a 360 view, but it's sadly  not the case. You'd also be surprised at how toothless the BBC can be when presented with something that's irrefutable but could, say, upset Murdoch or the DM...  Hands up, I'm guilty of platforming extreme right-wingers, misogynists, anti-abortionists, racists, anarchists, pro gun lobbyists, rape-apologists... you name it, I'm all for putting them in a programme. Even though I deplore what they stand for, it's important to me to have a counter-view, and they almost always hang themselves.  (Job done.)  It's funny that certain people are up in arms about Rockets posting 'misinformation' in the Traffic threads, but  seem OK with it in broadcast, as long as it aligns with their views. You have to ask yourselves, what is it that you really want? If it's an echo chamber then just watch Fox News or CNN, however you lean. But then what's the point of it all? I fear the ship's sailed, so I don't know why I bother. 
    • That’s right, we could see them passing us at the stops and then as we overtook them. There was one moped without lights doing about 30mph.    Stupid is one word, but when it puts pedestrians at risk, it’s a different word. We’ll be raising it and hopefully get some publicity about road safety awareness 
    • Yes, your name and political views aren't mentioned there, you see. But what the title of the thread does refer to is a report in the Telegraph (and other right wing and, actually, left wing media) on an internal BBC memo that was considered by the BBC board on 17 October 2025 and which was so devastating the Director General himself considered he should resign.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...