Jump to content

Dog Kennel Hill CPZ


Ashlar

Recommended Posts

johnie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I thought, as the whole of East Dulwich is within

> the south circular, we will be in the ULEZ, so I

> don't think we will be the dumping zone, that

> would be Forest Hill.


Phase 1 is for just the congestion charge zone, but you're right it then will be the whole of East Dulwich..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Southwark do post out permits to residents in CPZs but as long as you've done it all on-line there really is no need to display the permit. I don't.


We've had a CPZ for nearly two years and talking to the people who whizz about checking on vehicles, it's all done on-line and they get to know after a while who are residents, visitors, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone know the extent of this CPZ? We had a letter a little while ago, but as I don't own a vehicle, I put it to one side. But we are having visitors at the weekend who will be driving, so I'm trying to decipher it all.


We are in Petworth House, so off Pytchley Road. There are no signs or markings (it's one crazy free-for-all out there), and no cars seem to have permits in the windows. I'd always parked here without anything before this (with a hire car or visitors), but am not unsure if I need a permit?


Looks like Pytchley Road itself is permitted, but there is no info whatsoever on the Council site, that I can see at least, as to what is happening on the estate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the_greeno,

If you mean parking in the public street, then it will not be on the estate parking system. The estate parking officers may have no connection with or knowledge of street parking controls.

CPZ permits are not now displayed in the car window.

Any parking controls in place will be displayed on road markings and signs on posts.

Anyway you have now realised that it is not only car owners who are affected by CPZ's

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Mark


I've lived in plenty of areas with CPZ's in the past, so am well aware of the issues for those with and without cars. My problem here was that the info available was not clear - and was hard to clarify. I was interested in the estate parking, and had called/emailed the relevant contacts beforehand, only getting through today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Pot holes feel like they’re becoming more of an issue (based purely on my perception, don’t know what data there is). Even worse outside London imo. I suspect as Mal says, heavier vehicles are part of the problem (both SUVs, but also EVs which are generally heavier than ‘conventional’ cars), but regardless the council need to be more on it.  You can use the fixmystreet app to report them (and other street maintenance issues). 
    • Prior to the LTNs do you have many examples where the results of consultations were not acted upon? Seems to me the council is picking and choosing when they action the feedback from their constituents.......   Have you looked at the results from that, if not, tale some time to have a look, its quite enlightening..it seems the majority do not think the changes will have the desired effect....but you know it's not a refendum so the council has chosen to ignore the feedback of constituents. They must be assuming full responsibility for ignoring residents feedback- clearly they think they know what's best for us. If it all goes wrong let's see if they take responsibility!   Earl, here's a question for you (and i know you wont answer it but lets see)...why do you think the council has never asked a yes/no question to local residents about anything to do with the LTNs - wether they exist or whether we think the changes they have suggested (using our money) are needed/worthwhile? Or a consultation with a yes/no answer but we all know why. I still laugh that the council had to re-run the CPZ consultation with a yes/no answer and finally had to listen to their constituents...they took a hell of a spanking! They have been cheating the system for years and getting away with it. So does that not apply during consultations then? (P.S before you answer take a look at the definition of a consultation as provided by the Local Government Association).
    • What other matters of policy would you have decided by referendum, or is it just the one you feel strongly about? 🙄 We live in a representative democracy for good reason. After Brexit I thought this would be even clearer. We’ve had local elections since the LTN came in and those who introduced it were returned to office. You may want to revisit a debate that finished 3 years ago, but it isn’t going to happen. You need to move on. …still no one willing to defend the claims in One Dulwich’s latest missive I note. 😂
    • Please describe the missing item to me, and If the description is correct I let you know where to collect it. If noone responds I will bring it to the police in the next few days.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...