Jump to content

June 3rd will be the last day of The Palmerston


Recommended Posts

Abe_froeman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Greene King would not buy a sub lease though.

>

> They would buy a freehold pub with no lease at all

> on it - i.e. no lease to enterprise and no

> sub-lease to the pub manager.

>

> That seems to be the most likely scenario here. If

> the lease with Enterprise expires in June and the

> sub lease also expires the whole operation could

> be sold as one. I would guess that might be worth

> about ?5m.

>

> If I could cash in for that (after 15 years of

> hard work!) then personally I would let my lease

> expire and take no action to 'save' the pub.



That would imply it reverts to the freeholder after June (and I note your last paragraph :) ).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

?If the lease with Enterprise expires in June and the sub lease also expires the whole operation could be sold as one. I would guess that might be worth about ?5m.?


As far as I can make out, Jamie?s lease with Enterprise IS the sub-lease which is due to expire in June. I haven?t seen anything about Enterprise?s lease with the freeholder expiring soon though happy to be corrected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nxjen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Freehold owned by Jamie and Paul Rigby who

>

> Lease to

>

> Enterprise who

>

> Sub-lease to Jamie and this sub-lease is due to

> expire in June.




I'm wondering if this originated as a "sale and leaseback" - would only be the case if EI were the Freeholder before Jamie - and dont know how to check this


15 years ago:

EI (tbc) owned pub freehold, but have no tax deductible expense.

EI sell FH to Jamie, on the understanding that he will then offer to lease it back to them on the long lease.

EI get cash from the sale of the freehold

EI's annual lease cost to Jamie is tax deductible - they have therefore created an ongoing tax deductible expense out of an asset they previously owned


EI creates a sub lease to Jamie out of the long lease, perhpas 15 years - all is friendly

EI decides after 15 years not to renew the short lease. As freeholder who has granted a long lease Jamie has no control over this


EI now free to either create a new short sub lease for the remainder of the long lease term to a new venture, or take over the running of the pub themselves under the long lease


If EI feel that they had undercharged for the original 15 year sub lease, and will charge significantly more for the new sub lease they may have offered this renewal to Jamie at a rate that was too expensive for him to continue - or they may have just, as is assumed, not wanted to continue working with him, full stop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Penguin68 says:


"Where the commercial lease has time-terminated the freeholder has no requirement to extend the lease or offer the leaseholder a new lease." That's not right in all circumstances, but not worth a teach-in here...


This all sounds very like what happened to another EI tenant I know. EI are commercially as sharp as razorblades. A petition won't help, unfortunately, because they're solely about getting sufficient cashflow to service their humonguous debt. They won't GAF about the community aspects. Only money talks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Having looked at the other Old Spot pubs mentioned in the press release it seems that the food menu is fashioned according to each location. Unsurprisingly the pub in Farnham Common appears to have a food offering closest to the current Palmerston whereas the Limehouse offering is distinctly pub grub. I guess we have to hope the ED offering will be closer to the Farnham Common end of the spectrum!


http://lgn1390837841.site-fusion.co.uk/restaurant-menu

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Abe_froeman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Looks like EI are becoming quite vindictive in all

> of this row

>

> https://www.instagram.com/p/BxehbI1nofX/?utm_sourc

> e=ig_web_copy_link

>

> Seems they've granted a new lease to a vehicle

> called "Old Spot Pubs" which is actually just a

> subsidiary of Enterprise Inns.


I agree on the pinkish colour with one of the comments - It's a great colour :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The whole thing is a 21st century swindle. And frankly a disgrace. How can a successful and much-loved part of the community be taken away so easily.

May I bring everyone's attention to what these guys who are apparently taking over say they're about.


Dave Ford, who is behind this joint venture with Ei that is taking over the Palmerston, said as recently as February, the following.


"We tend to take on pubs that have been shut for a while with the intention of giving the community back their local."


You're a hypocrite Mr Ford. If you want to give, as you say "the community back their local," give us back the Palmerston.


Until that time, I hope I see no one in whatever emerges. You don't have to call it a boycott. It's standing up for the community and its people.


I suggest that when Mr. Ford's crew turn up, we throw this line back in his face, time and time again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not even sure that a 'boycott' will be necessary. Looking at 'The Star of the East' the food offering is nothing like the quality of the Palmerston, so think that it won't necessary attract the same people. Will be interesting to see if there is a market for the middle of the road pubco pub food offering? Feels a bit like the pub food bit is well catered for, but I guess we will see once it opens. It reminds me a little of when Adventure Bar moved in, totally misjudged the market and closed down in a relatively short period of time.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

goldilocks Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not even sure that a 'boycott' will be necessary.

> Looking at 'The Star of the East' the food

> offering is nothing like the quality of the

> Palmerston, so think that it won't necessary

> attract the same people. Will be interesting to

> see if there is a market for the middle of the

> road pubco pub food offering? Feels a bit like

> the pub food bit is well catered for, but I guess

> we will see once it opens. It reminds me a little

> of when Adventure Bar moved in, totally misjudged

> the market and closed down in a relatively short

> period of time.


Adventure Bar should have worked at that point but now it would be Peckham :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's wait and see. Ultimately this is a commercial dispute, we don't have full details of.


Does seem very odd current owners own the freehold though. Presumably they'll be able take it back eventually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • "If I hear 'my father was a tool maker' / my wife's a nurse / my father was a GP one more time... as if any of those things qualify anyone to fix / understand anything. "   yeah but that's not the point here - many (most?) of the people watching last night are the voters who tend not to pay much attention to Westminster and may well buy the "they are all the same - born into money and detached from real life" - so Starmer's story, as overplayed as it is to you and me will be news to many
    • It was an absolute shit show. And so much anger coming from both sides, not becoming at all (was surprised how riled cool Rishi was getting).  Agree about the format, it was lazy, whatsherchops wasn't asking pertinent questions, she was just going for binary yesses or nos. The producers didn't force either side to drill down on anything, just make commitments so they got good soundbites.  If I hear 'my father was a tool maker' / my wife's a nurse / my father was a GP one more time... as if any of those things qualify anyone to fix / understand anything. 
    • Good.  Subsidence claims generally have an excess of £1000 per claim, but was yours higher?
    • Indeed, many house here have had or will have subsidence issues so one needs to bear that in mind.  Many houses here have shallow foundations but they have been around 100 years or so without too much issue. What the surveyor has told you doesn't feel like a 'red flag', more of a sensible warning.  Bear in mind that although the surveyor is nominally working for you, their focus iln reality is mostly on the lender and the risk of being sued, either by them or you.  So they are always pretty cautious.  It would be wise to get a 2nd opinion, eg. from a structural engineer.  Or talk  to the original surveyor directly as they may say more than they are prepared to put in a report.  It's a little difficult from the description to identify what the situation is but the scenario in which part of a property has been underpinned and the rest has not is fairly common here.  The proximity of trees is likely to be the main thing to be concerned about, particularly after the hot summer of 2002, as insurers generally regard them as risky, especially if they are not cut back from time to time.  A second surveyor can advise directly on this. It would definitely be worth trying to take over the current buildings insurance.  Indeed, it may be quite hard to find new cover.  Enquire what the current premium is and who the policy is ultiimately underwitten by (ie. is it a name that you have ever heard of?)  The insurance industry, in general, works to a guideline that the insurance of an underpinned property should transfer to a new owner.   https://www.biba.org.uk/insurance-guides/home-insurance-guides/subsidence/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...