Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LM, you may recall our discussion on Katie back in

> August. But here's a link to what Katie did

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?2

> 0,729998,page=17

>

> I'm pretty sure I could find a more few posts

> where Katie tried slinging more mud.


"Our" discussion? How dare you! I recall your comments though. I wasn't interested then, and I am certainly not interested now.


I'm out!

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And stay out. Your last PM was deleted and have

> not been read. Please don't send anymore PMs. They

> will be deleted too.


Excuse me? I'm the one who asked YOU not to PM me further! You contacted me out of the blue on account of my post on this thread. Twice! I, in addition to making the request that you no longer PM me, merely issued my responses. Perhaps you'd like me to print our communications here in order to refresh your memory.


I am not sure what has got into you UDT, I've never seen you like this.


What an ugly thread. Goodnight all.

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Like I said 'Hubris' isn't the right word to

> describe me and to be frank no one in my lifetime

> have successfully put a label on me either.


Tw*t


There you go.


I think everyone would agree that sticks.

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I did find facts and evidence very challenging as

> there were none in any of your posts. I suggest

> you put up or shut up. Personally, knowing what I

> know, I think it's going to be the latter.


And what do you 'know' then, master?

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Here is some more evidence where the Ordinary Joes

> were victims of the financial crisis. Come on

> Damian show me your evidence, you imbecille.


"Mortgage broker dupes couple - read all about it". Well, that's me put in my place. Based upon your utterly moronic arguments we have to conclude that the entire medical profession is full of crooks and n'er-do-wells on the grounds that Dr Harold Shipman murdered some of his patients.


Shall we lock up all the Doctors too UDT?

I am just waiting for UDT to tell us 'What Katie Did Next'.


I have to say that it's bad enough UDT posting in a manner that reveals a level of ignorance, blinkered thinking and slight un-hingedness - it just takes things to a completely new level when, in light of that, he starts to big himself up as some type of super-brain.


It reminds me of a chap I worked with many moons ago who was a paranoid and rather obnoxious type, viewed with disdain by most of the women in the office, who had managed to convince himself nonetheless that he was lusted after by every woman in the place. The chasm between the reality and the self-perception in that case is reminiscent of UDT in these present circumstances.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think that was outrageous Damian H, you clearly

> persecute me you twit, and the girls were all

> lesbians; it's obvious they all fancied me.

>

> Please note quality use of semicolon.


Because even UDT can 'convert' a lesbian, as you would know if you could do research. See below the link to the Daily Star...

Damian H Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Annette Curtain Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I reckon UTD has gone.

> >

> > Never to be seen again.

> >

> > Honest I do.

> >

> > Either that or he's rewiring the Hadron

> Collider

> > whilst wearing a blindfold.

> >

> >

> > NETTE:-S

>

>

> and juggling!



http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/upload/2009/04/weekend_diversion_do_tinfoil_h/tinfoil-hat.jpg "You'll be sorry you said that..."

giggirl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> OMG Katie Numbers has definitely planted things in

> my head. Definitely. Is there a support network

> I can turn to? Help, someone, anyone, help.

>

> I also suspect she may have tried to get me banned

> - Admin, please confirm?



Well put it this way Giggirl if it wasnt her it was probably me :-)

Katie?.........zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz ;D


And edited to add (in an attempt to move on from the poor display of 'same old same old' the thread has descended into) that I think Fred has been treated more as a symbol of the recent crisis rather than scapegoat. Whatever the rights or wrongs of the removal of his knighthood on an individual and personal level, as a man 'at the top' in a public capacity he can't have been too suprised at the backlash. Banks have always accepted the role of engine of the economy. With power comes responsibility. I think they forgot that somewhere and someone was always going to have to personify that. Fred came to be that onev in the UK. I don't think he can complain about it tbh.

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Damian H Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Annette Curtain Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > I reckon UTD has gone.

> > >

> > > Never to be seen again.

> > >

> > > Honest I do.

> > >

> > > Either that or he's rewiring the Hadron

> > Collider

> > > whilst wearing a blindfold.

> > >

> > >

> > > NETTE:-S

> >

> >

> > and juggling!

>

>

> http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/upload/200

> 9/04/weekend_diversion_do_tinfoil_h/tinfoil-hat.jp

> g "You'll be sorry you said that..."



As long as there is a blend of cotton wool and chopped raw liver inside that tin-foil hat all is well - no evil Thought Insertion can take place!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I've never got Christmas pudding. The only times I've managed to make it vaguely acceptable to people is thus: Buy a really tiny one when it's remaindered in Tesco's. They confound carbon dating, so the yellow labelled stuff at 75% off on Boxing Day will keep you going for years. Chop it up and soak it in Stones Ginger Wine and left over Scotch. Mix it in with a decent vanilla ice cream. It's like a festive Rum 'n' Raisin. Or: Stick a couple in a demijohn of Aldi vodka and serve it to guests, accompanied by 'The Party's Over' by Johnny Mathis when people simply won't leave your flat.
    • Not miserable at all! I feel the same and also want to complain to the council but not sure who or where best to aim it at? I have flagged it with our local MP and one Southwark councillor previously but only verbally when discussing other things and didn’t get anywhere other than them agreeing it was very frustrating etc. but would love to do something on paper. I think they’ve been pretty much every night for the last couple of weeks and my cat is hating it! As am I !
    • That is also a Young's pub, like The Cherry Tree. However fantastic the menu looks, you might want to ask exactly who will cook the food on the day, and how. Also, if  there is Christmas pudding on the menu, you might want to ask how that will be cooked, and whether it will look and/or taste anything like the Christmas puddings you have had in the past.
    • This reminds me of a situation a few years ago when a mate's Dad was coming down and fancied Franklin's for Christmas Day. He'd been there once, in September, and loved it. Obviously, they're far too tuned in to do it, so having looked around, £100 per head was pretty standard for fairly average pubs around here. That is ridiculous. I'd go with Penguin's idea; one of the best Christmas Day lunches I've ever had was at the Lahore Kebab House in Whitechapel. And it was BYO. After a couple of Guinness outside Franklin's, we decided £100 for four people was the absolute maximum, but it had to be done in the style of Franklin's and sourced within walking distance of The Gowlett. All the supermarkets knock themselves out on veg as a loss leader - particularly anything festive - and the Afghani lads on Rye Lane are brilliant for more esoteric stuff and spices, so it really doesn't need to be pricey. Here's what we came up with. It was considerably less than £100 for four. Bread & Butter (Lidl & Lurpak on offer at Iceland) Mersea Oysters (Sopers) Parsnip & Potato Soup ( I think they were both less than 20 pence a kilo at Morrisons) Smoked mackerel, Jerseys, watercress & radish (Sopers) Rolled turkey breast joint (£7.95 from Iceland) Roast Duck (two for £12 at Lidl) Mash  Carrots, star anise, butter emulsion. Stir-fried Brussels, bacon, chestnuts and Worcestershire sauce.(Lidl) Clementine and limoncello granita (all from Lidl) Stollen (Lidl) Stichelton, Cornish Cruncher, Stinking Bishop. (Marks & Sparks) There was a couple of lessons to learn: Don't freeze mash. It breaks down the cellular structure and ends up more like a French pomme purée. I renamed it 'Pomme Mikael Silvestre' after my favourite French centre-half cum left back and got away with it, but if you're not amongst football fans you may not be so lucky. Tasted great, looked like shit. Don't take the clementine granita out of the freezer too early, particularly if you've overdone it on the limoncello. It melts quickly and someone will suggest snorting it. The sugar really sticks your nostrils together on Boxing Day. Speaking of 'lost' Christmases past, John Lewis have hijacked Alison Limerick's 'Where Love Lives' for their new advert. Bastards. But not a bad ad.   Beansprout, I have a massive steel pot I bought from a Nigerian place on Choumert Road many years ago. It could do with a work out. I'm quite prepared to make a huge, spicy parsnip soup for anyone who fancies it and a few carols.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...