Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LM, you may recall our discussion on Katie back in

> August. But here's a link to what Katie did

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?2

> 0,729998,page=17

>

> I'm pretty sure I could find a more few posts

> where Katie tried slinging more mud.


"Our" discussion? How dare you! I recall your comments though. I wasn't interested then, and I am certainly not interested now.


I'm out!

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And stay out. Your last PM was deleted and have

> not been read. Please don't send anymore PMs. They

> will be deleted too.


Excuse me? I'm the one who asked YOU not to PM me further! You contacted me out of the blue on account of my post on this thread. Twice! I, in addition to making the request that you no longer PM me, merely issued my responses. Perhaps you'd like me to print our communications here in order to refresh your memory.


I am not sure what has got into you UDT, I've never seen you like this.


What an ugly thread. Goodnight all.

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Like I said 'Hubris' isn't the right word to

> describe me and to be frank no one in my lifetime

> have successfully put a label on me either.


Tw*t


There you go.


I think everyone would agree that sticks.

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I did find facts and evidence very challenging as

> there were none in any of your posts. I suggest

> you put up or shut up. Personally, knowing what I

> know, I think it's going to be the latter.


And what do you 'know' then, master?

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Here is some more evidence where the Ordinary Joes

> were victims of the financial crisis. Come on

> Damian show me your evidence, you imbecille.


"Mortgage broker dupes couple - read all about it". Well, that's me put in my place. Based upon your utterly moronic arguments we have to conclude that the entire medical profession is full of crooks and n'er-do-wells on the grounds that Dr Harold Shipman murdered some of his patients.


Shall we lock up all the Doctors too UDT?

I am just waiting for UDT to tell us 'What Katie Did Next'.


I have to say that it's bad enough UDT posting in a manner that reveals a level of ignorance, blinkered thinking and slight un-hingedness - it just takes things to a completely new level when, in light of that, he starts to big himself up as some type of super-brain.


It reminds me of a chap I worked with many moons ago who was a paranoid and rather obnoxious type, viewed with disdain by most of the women in the office, who had managed to convince himself nonetheless that he was lusted after by every woman in the place. The chasm between the reality and the self-perception in that case is reminiscent of UDT in these present circumstances.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think that was outrageous Damian H, you clearly

> persecute me you twit, and the girls were all

> lesbians; it's obvious they all fancied me.

>

> Please note quality use of semicolon.


Because even UDT can 'convert' a lesbian, as you would know if you could do research. See below the link to the Daily Star...

Damian H Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Annette Curtain Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I reckon UTD has gone.

> >

> > Never to be seen again.

> >

> > Honest I do.

> >

> > Either that or he's rewiring the Hadron

> Collider

> > whilst wearing a blindfold.

> >

> >

> > NETTE:-S

>

>

> and juggling!



http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/upload/2009/04/weekend_diversion_do_tinfoil_h/tinfoil-hat.jpg "You'll be sorry you said that..."

giggirl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> OMG Katie Numbers has definitely planted things in

> my head. Definitely. Is there a support network

> I can turn to? Help, someone, anyone, help.

>

> I also suspect she may have tried to get me banned

> - Admin, please confirm?



Well put it this way Giggirl if it wasnt her it was probably me :-)

Katie?.........zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz ;D


And edited to add (in an attempt to move on from the poor display of 'same old same old' the thread has descended into) that I think Fred has been treated more as a symbol of the recent crisis rather than scapegoat. Whatever the rights or wrongs of the removal of his knighthood on an individual and personal level, as a man 'at the top' in a public capacity he can't have been too suprised at the backlash. Banks have always accepted the role of engine of the economy. With power comes responsibility. I think they forgot that somewhere and someone was always going to have to personify that. Fred came to be that onev in the UK. I don't think he can complain about it tbh.

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Damian H Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Annette Curtain Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > I reckon UTD has gone.

> > >

> > > Never to be seen again.

> > >

> > > Honest I do.

> > >

> > > Either that or he's rewiring the Hadron

> > Collider

> > > whilst wearing a blindfold.

> > >

> > >

> > > NETTE:-S

> >

> >

> > and juggling!

>

>

> http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/upload/200

> 9/04/weekend_diversion_do_tinfoil_h/tinfoil-hat.jp

> g "You'll be sorry you said that..."



As long as there is a blend of cotton wool and chopped raw liver inside that tin-foil hat all is well - no evil Thought Insertion can take place!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • And from what I remember, she eventually cut the tea shop for a similar  reason to chandelier.  Chariot style buggies
    • Oh yes, it could have been about there, I can't remember exactly. At one point there seemed to be a load of pizza places opening on NCR. I vaguely remember the one we used to use was put out of business by another one which opened. Wasn't Grace and Favour's food offering more of a tea shop at the back of the actual shop? If memory serves the owner, whose name escapes me now, was one of the earliest people I know to move to Hastings. Which must now be crammed with South East Londoners 🤣
    • That Neal Street veggie cafe was great. Food For Thought ❤️
    • Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, You won't be aware that i proposed infill sites for housing in East Dulwich - the garages on Bassano Street and Henslowe that respectively became 1-4 Dill Terrace family houses and the 78, 80, 80A Henslowe Street family houses. These were council owned garages and it was frustrating how slow the council was to go from my idea to completion (roughly eight years). East Dulwich has some other vacant WW2 bomb sites I'm guessing that the private land owners have been sitting on.Owe for a land tax for vacant land.  WRT to the builders yard by East dulwich station. Southwark Council has an agreed policy the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum. But the approved scheme is 9 storeys of student accommodation. Very hard to put this genie back in the bottle. The council has recently publicly stated lower ratios of social housing will be required. I will be amazed if the developer doesn't submit another application now they have the 9 storeys approved but with significantly less social housing. The less social housing the higher the land values. The higher the land values the less social housing viability reports state are possible.  If we really want to increase home supply - Southwark have over 6,000 empty homes. Vancouver charges a low % of the value of empty homes and rapidly eased this problem. Parts of Wales have introduced under Article 4 planning permission is required for second homes seeing within 12 months a dramatic decrease in property prices. Southwark Council have Article 4 requirements - why not add this one? It takes National political will to solve this AND regional and local authorities such as the second home council tax premium and these being used promptly. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...