Jump to content

23rd March - ?Put It To The People March? - central London


Recommended Posts

Can anyone else help me out then?


Which bit of my post is Robbin referring to when they say ""Not a single one of those projections was made on that basis, as you well know. I chose the examples carefully. So your observation is invalid."


If they mean the claims in their post such as: " Loss of 500,000 jobs straight after the vote over

> 2 years ago. Utterly false. (ETA - see below unemployment figures out today) " I don't understand why my link addressing that exact point is being dismissed


I might not be making my points well, or clearly. But I'm not trolling

Whatever "lies" or "misinformation" you think the Remain side were telling (all of whcih was dismissed blithely as Project Fear), it only seems to be the Leave side which broke electoral law repeatedly, they've just been fined again for further breaches:


https://www.joe.co.uk/news/vote-leave-fined-40-grand-breaking-electoral-law-224139?fbclid=IwAR10XgxK14F_wV_HBumze6kVIMDHHm_U3q9UfRMapodH7Wlyltrfl1WVACE


And as you can see from the Twitter campaign on the Led By Donkeys page which are quoting all the tweets and comment made by Leave politicians about "the easiest deal in history", "we have all the cards", the notorious "take back control".

All of them wrong. Outright lies.



Entertaining watch - aimed at those poor hard-of-understanding Yanks but it kind of works here too.

robbin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Straight into recession. Utterly false, GDP has

> grown every quarter since - it is the German

> economy on the brink of recession.


I didn't have the time to respond to this earlier, so I'd like to revisit.

I always thought that the claim of going straight into recession after the referendum was a strange one, because for there to be a technical recession there needs to be 2 successive quarters (i.e. 6 months) of falling GDP growth (note falling not negative), which means it's impossible to go into an immediate technical recession. Happy to be corrected if there's another definition of recession that economists use.


Also, when recession is mentioned one has to look beyond the headlines. For instance, let's say Germany's GDP fell from 2.5% to 2.25% to 2% over 2 quarters, and over the same period the UK's rose from 0.5% to 1% to 1.5%. Germany is technically in recession but still performing better than the UK. I'm not saying that's the case now, as I haven't checked, just that one needs to dig deeper to get the bigger picture.

I have though had a look at UK GDP and I can't find anything that backs up your claim that GDP has grown every quarter since the referendum. Growth has remained positive, i.e. above 0%, but it hasn't continually grown each quarter, there's been lots of ups and downs. Here's a graph to explain...https://tradingeconomics.com/united-kingdom/gdp-growth

I also think it's better to look at long term growth as opposed to snapshots, I'm spoiling you, here's another graph... https://fullfact.org/economy/uk-economic-growth-higher-europe/ Note the switch-over in fortunes between the EU and UK just happens to be at the time of the referendum. Around this time the world economy in general picked up, yet we trundled along. And as has often been cited, the UK went from being at the top of the G7 growth league to the bottom. Brexit itself can't be blamed as it's not happened, but uncertainty over it has clearly played a big part...

DR wrote:


"I have though had a look at UK GDP and I can't find anything that backs up your claim that GDP has grown every quarter since the referendum. Growth has remained positive, i.e. above 0%, but it hasn't continually grown each quarter, there's been lots of ups and downs. Here's a graph to explain...[tradingeconomics.com]"


Isn't that the very essence of growth? If GDP has grown every quarter (i.e. is a positive % figure on top of the previous quarter) then my statement was correct - GDP has grown every quarter - as is borne out by your chart. I think you are confusing it with whether the rate of increase of GDP has increased every quarter, which is a different thing and not something I have ever said?


The current deteriorating German economic situation is summed up here: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/feb/14/german-economy-just-avoids-recession-but-weaker-exports-take-toll

It's embarrassing I know, but there's no need to be snippy. Just Google it. There's no need to continue to be wrong about something so basic as that (seeing as you are making points based on a false premise).


Obviously I'm aware of your sentiment already - no problem - I'm not bothered whether you give a f**k or not - I have no idea who you are, so why would I be?!

Hemingway Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Remainer here, but UK has not been in reccession

> since referendum. Recession is two quarters of

> negative growth not a reduced growth rate....as

> you were


Thank you Hemmingway. That is the conventional (and correct) definition as I have always understood it to be. I've not seen dr's version before and having studied macro economics at postgraduate level I presume I would at some point have come across it, had it been the measure. But then I couldn't rule out the possibility I hadn't been down the pub for that particular lecture.

I don't actually support a second referendum. I think at this point, we should simply stand up for representative democracy and withdraw article 50 on the grounds that it has not been possible to deliver a brexit deal that parliament can agree is in the best interests of the country. Leaders need to be leading.


Will still try to go to the March however, to call for revoke and remain.

are we clear on what the options are for a second ref?


it needs to be binary and can't be vague (leave/ don't leave)


A list of things the gov would change in order for the WA to be passed would be helpful (in fact, why is this not known)

"A list of things the gov would change in order for the WA to be passed would be helpful (in fact, why is this not known)"


Because the discussion is over. The Govt can change or say what they like but the discussion phase with EU is over


The deal is the deal. So only options now are That Deal, No Deal or No Brexit (teh latter either via revocations or possibly via ref. I think Leavers should have had courage of their convictions re ref2 and had it. I think it's too late now and revocation is more likely)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • OP has perhaps inadvertently provided free advertising for Gails, drawing attention to Dulwich Gails being open on Christmas Day.
    • Staff get taxis in and out and get paid extra (which I think is x2). Some people like to work on Bank Holidays and others don’t. Some people actively avoid Christmas for personal reasons. Long live freedom of choice! 
    • Here is another article from the excellent Special Needs Jungle (SNJ) with tips for responses to the SEND conversation survey. Including shoe horning in EHCPs which they "forget" to ask a question about in the conversation. And living as we do in Southwark with the huge misfortune of 100% academy secondary schools, some thoughts on this and how unlikely inclusion in mainstream is within the current education landscape. Closing date 14 Jan 2026. And please consider a donation to the excellent entirely run by volunteers SNJ. In my view the government could save money by creating some smaller mainstream secondary schools for kids who can cope in primary school but not  with the scale of secondary, and need a calmer less busy setting. The funding would have to be different - it is currently on a per pupil basis which favours larger schools. But it would undoubtedly be cheaper than specialist provision, and the huge cost to individual children and families (emotional and financial) and to society. https://www.specialneedsjungle.com/tips-help-complete-governments-send-conversation-survey-law/ If anyone wants to take a radical step to help their struggling child, my tip is to move far away: these are the best two schools I have ever visited and in a beautiful part of the country. I only wish we'd moved there before it was too late for my son who had to suffer multiple failings at Charter North and then at the hands of Southwark SEND, out of education from February to October in year 10-11, having already suffered the enduring trauma of a very difficult early life, which in combination with ADHD made his time at schools which just don't care so very unbearable for all of us. https://www.cartmelprioryschool.co.uk/ https://settlebeck.org/ As an add on, I would say to anybody considering adoption, please take into account the education battles that you are very much more likely to face than the average parent. First you have schools to deal with, already terrible; then being passed from pillar to post within Southwark Education, SEND, Education Inclusion Team, round and round as they all do their best to explain why they are not responsible and you need someone different, let's hold another multi-agency meeting, never for one minute considering that if they put the child at the centre and used common sense they would achieve a lot more in much less time without loads of Southwark employees sitting in endless meetings with long suffering parents. It is hard to fully imagine this at the start of your adoption journey, full of hope as you are, but truly education is not for the faint hearted, and should be factored into your decision. You'll never hear from people who are really struggling and continue to do so, only from those who've had challenges but overcome them and it's all lovely. And education, the very people who should be there to help, are the ones who make your lives the most hellish out of everything your child and you face.
    • It’s a big problem all over London. I’ve seen it happen in Kennington and Bloomsbury in the last year. I think there has been some progress recently with some key arrests, but you do need to be very careful when walking around with your phone out, especially, as you say, if wearing noise cancelling headphones. Sorry you experienced this 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...