Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hard on the heels of attempt to kill Lordship Lane with CPZ comes next assault on local businesses. Consultation on proposed levy on licensed premises open after midnight has been announced.

Why not close all businesses down and create a giant cycle park and use empty shops for drop in consultation surgeries.

With all the serious local and international issues, and the Labour Party mired in hatred and antisemitism, only Southwark could become a one issue party completely dominated by the People?s front for Cycling.

se22cat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Speaking of the Two Wheeled Peril, it'd be nice if

> TFL could spend a few quid and get some Boris

> Bikes for ED


Are you mad? They'd take up valuable carparking spaces or stop elderly people getting down the pavement or (fill in generic reason why bicycling is second only to smallpox as a threat to health and happiness).

Chick did you not notice the 8 Labour party MPs resigning from the party last week?


Back on topic, this consultation is for a borough wide tax on all businesses selling alcohol after 12am. 70% of the funds raised will go to the Met who can then spend it as they see fit pretty much anywhere within the M25


https://consultations.southwark.gov.uk/environment-leisure/late-night-levy/consult_view/

JoeLeg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Maybe take it to a different thread Chick?

>

> It?s a volatile subject, likely to lead to serious

> thread detailing.


To be honest the OP derailed their own thread right from the start - only one sentence is about the actual topic, the rest is moaning about Labour and cycling, which is presumably why Admin lounged it a soon as it was posted.

Sidll1 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hard on the heels of attempt to kill Lordship Lane

> with CPZ comes next assault on local businesses.

> Consultation on proposed levy on licensed premises

> open after midnight has been announced.

> Why not close all businesses down and create a

> giant cycle park and use empty shops for drop in

> consultation surgeries.

> With all the serious local and international

> issues, and the Labour Party mired in hatred and

> antisemitism, only Southwark could become a one

> issue party completely dominated by the People?s

> front for Cycling.


Maybe not on Friday and Saturday - but if it's all week ?


Anyway link here


https://www.london-se1.co.uk/news/view/9839

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Are you mad? They'd take up valuable carparking

> spaces or stop elderly people getting down the

> pavement or (fill in generic reason why bicycling

> is second only to smallpox as a threat to health

> and happiness).


I do apologise; not quite sure what came over me there. I must be suffering from lack of car exhaust fumes or something :) you are clearly right, down with all this health and happiness stuff and nonsense!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have had multiple jobs completed at my home by T.D. PLUMBFIX SOLUTIONS LTD, and I wouldn't go to anyone else now. They always come at the agreed day/time, I have never been asked to rearrange. The jobs have always been completed to extremely high standards, and as a perfectionist myself, I appreciate this level of care and detail. I'm grateful of the clear up afterward too, leaving me very little to do after the job is done. I am always blown away by the speed and efficiency  - no waffle, no flannel, just sheer hard work from start to finish. In summary - a highly professional first class service. Don't hesitate to call T.D. PLUMBFIX SOLUTIONS LTD, if you like excellence and trade people that will respect your home. 
    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...