.

[Huguenot]

Psychologists would describe that aggressive response, where you once again failed to answer the question, as 'masking'.

The idea being that if you respond with sufficient aggression you will deter the enquirer from exposing your weakness.

So that's probably a clear indicator that you don't really know why you posted about cloud seeding?

[New Nexus]

Mountains and molehills come to mind.

Ps.

Congratulations on your phd in psychology.

[Huguenot]

I think that's called displacement ;-)

Not sure you need a PHD to see what's right in front of you?

What you were trying to do was vindicate breadbin's lunatic claim that vapour trails are a terrorist attack on Birmingham by juxtaposing it with the science of cloud seeding.

In doing so you hoped that the terrorist attack claim would somehow seem more plausible, and that you could jack up the fear level of the general population.

That's what moves you from being a harmless nut into a rather more vindictive position.

[New Nexus]

Phd in psychology and Mind reading ? dude join the circus.

[El Pibe]

New Nexus.

I have to say I actually quite enjoy your weird links and bonkers theories, that surety that you are party to esoteric knowledge [self-]denied the rest of us sheeple.

And despite the fact that the theories themselves (and your general worldview that nothing is what it seems running counter to the quacks-like-a-duck/occam's razor approach to things) offend my sensibilities, I think I'd rather miss you if you stopped doing it.

I am however left wondering why you bother doing it on these boards where you are invariably dismissed as a loon, undermined with pesky things like facts and constantly have fun poked of you.

I'm sure there must be richer seams of positive feedback for you on t'interweb.

[New Nexus]

And are these sentiments shared by the rest of the voices in your head.

[El Pibe]

and you wonder why I think you're a bot?

I'll rewrite my last post in small words shall I?

You make me laugh, but really, why do you keep coming back here when everyone thinks you're theories are daft and worthless?

It's a genuine question, one I'd be interested to read a real response to an actual question asked of you for once.

You don't invest much of yourself in this board do you, you just like to swan in with a vague air of superiority and the debating skills of a twelve year old, and deposit strange morsels of internetwattery.

Come on, what team do you support, music, a bit of Wagner as you ponder the impending apocalypse?

What made you distrust authority so, did your nanny read you HP Lovecraft instead of AA Milne, did a journo break the news to you about Santa or something?

[Huguenot]

...and NN delivers yet more of these weird robotic non-sequiturs. It's couched as a question, but delivered with bathos and inappropriate punctuation.

They don't quite work - they're not quite part of a dialogue. They don't seem to relate to the rest of the thread.

It's like NN's responses are generated from keyword prompts.

I guess they're intended as biting wit, but they feel so wooden - hollow almost.

[Loz]

I'm still waiting for: "Say, do you have any psychological problems?". NN is ELIZA and I claim my ?5.

[New Nexus]

And Pow, the triangle is complete with the three biscuit smelling prefects

http://xtrvaluedvds.com/images/the-three-stooges-2.bmp

Once again drunk on their own hubris

[Loz]

I'm a prefect? Cool. Tuck your shirt in, NN. Straighten your tie, NN. Tie your shoelaces, NN.

Look the last one up on YouTube if, as seems the case, you don't know how.

[Huguenot]

Ye gods NN, do you know what hubris means? How it can be used in sentences?

You can't be 'drunk on hubris' until after the fact. Had the Birmingham chem trails actually been a terrorist attack and we'd been left looking silly, then we could suffer hubris.

Before the fall, it's simply arrogance. Of which, when faced with mental conspiracy theories, mea culpa.

[New Nexus]

Try googleing turn of phrase then google ?drunk on their own hubris?

Sorry forgot bot?s don?t think outside of machine code.

[ultraburner]

Mind-control chemicals being sprayed upon us from seven miles up? Seems entirely plausable to me(tu) and probably one of the most efficient ways I can think of to administer said chemicals.

Got any links about lizards or spaceships nn?

[El Pibe]

[pre]

# newnexusbot v.1.0

imports feedparser

imports turingresponder

import's grocersapostrophe

[/pre]

nice touch, gives it that air of rabid, pubescent, flamer authenticity!!

touched you last

[New Nexus]

ultraburner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mind-control chemicals being sprayed upon us from

> seven miles up? Seems entirely plausable to me(tu)

> and probably one of the most efficient ways I can

> think of to administer said chemicals.

>

> Got any links about lizards or spaceships nn?

Again, what part of cloud seeding do you not understand.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_seeding

[*Bob*]

Ah.. The Drawing Room: set-up as an antidote to the silliness of The Lounge.

Bravo.

[El Pibe]

Nowhere is immune sadly star-bob.

NN. This thread asserts that contrails are actually chem trails.

The far more likely answer is that they are in fact condensation formed from jets travelling at high altitude.

Someone then posted an article suggesting that terrorists are dumping chemicals high in the sky above Brimingham.

This one too is unsubstantiated speculation.

You then linked to a wikipedia article about cloud seeding.

Either this is just a completely non-sequitur link because you happened to feel like talking about cloud seeding or you are implying that the terrorist attack was actually a terrorist group trying to make it rain over Birmingham.

Yes cloud seeding exists. It has by and large been proven unreliable at any form of weather control, that's not to say noone has ever tried, usually in places suffering sever drought.

Why anyone would cloud seed above Birmingham is anyone's guess. Why terrorists would do so is even more mistifying given the difficulties, enormous costs and limited socio-political effects of some unexpected rain over a large metropolitan area.

Hair bleach is cheaper and things going bang tend to get noticed a bit more when trying to bring society to its knees or force governments into your desired action.

So we're still left with a need for you to answer: What is your point regards the cloud seeding?

[ultraburner]

Again, what part of cloud seeding do you not understand.

from the link you provided:

"For release by aircraft, silver iodide flares are ignited and dispersed as an aircraft flies through the inflow of a cloud."

Could you explain how this would go un-noticed please, nn? I dont see an awful lot of clouds in the first photo on this thread, and I havent heard any reports of flares being released and ignited from airliners.

And then theres the small matter of the airline companies from many different nations all being highly co-ordinated and secretive in the complex execution of this chemical seeding so that the CIA/Illuminati/aliens/Elvis could control our puny brains with their all-powerful chemical mind-rubbers..... like I said, seems fair enough, doesn't it?

[Loz]

Cloud seeding above Birmingham... how the hell would you ever know it worked? Like it doesn't rain much there normally.

[Brendan]

Has this got something to do with all the rain we're having?

[tallulah71]

I have frien...acquaintances who are all obsessed with posting chemtrail / conspiracy theory / US Govt / 'facts' on FB. They all have one thing in common: they take an absurd amount of mind-altering drugs. I'm a fan of Ben Goldacre myself...he cool, he clever and I'm guessing doesn't spend his weekends bumping the K.

[gedwina]

Try - all my bonkers friends who think the "man is out to get them" are all heavy users of various white powders

I always thought that a much easier way to "dose the population" would be to put something in the water - much easier and cheaper than flying around the place.

[El Pibe]

By the sounds of things the population are doing a pretty good job of dosing themselves.

Is there any truth to the thing about 90% of bank notes in circulation tested have traces of cocaine on them?

[El Pibe]

caveat mailtor

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1241775/Every-British-bank-note-contaminated-cocaine-weeks-entering-circulation.html

It's all of them apparently