Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Psychologists would describe that aggressive response, where you once again failed to answer the question, as 'masking'.


The idea being that if you respond with sufficient aggression you will deter the enquirer from exposing your weakness.


So that's probably a clear indicator that you don't really know why you posted about cloud seeding?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/22242--/page/4/#findComment-544289
Share on other sites

I think that's called displacement ;-)


Not sure you need a PHD to see what's right in front of you?


What you were trying to do was vindicate breadbin's lunatic claim that vapour trails are a terrorist attack on Birmingham by juxtaposing it with the science of cloud seeding.


In doing so you hoped that the terrorist attack claim would somehow seem more plausible, and that you could jack up the fear level of the general population.


That's what moves you from being a harmless nut into a rather more vindictive position.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/22242--/page/4/#findComment-544448
Share on other sites

New Nexus.

I have to say I actually quite enjoy your weird links and bonkers theories, that surety that you are party to esoteric knowledge [self-]denied the rest of us sheeple.


And despite the fact that the theories themselves (and your general worldview that nothing is what it seems running counter to the quacks-like-a-duck/occam's razor approach to things) offend my sensibilities, I think I'd rather miss you if you stopped doing it.


I am however left wondering why you bother doing it on these boards where you are invariably dismissed as a loon, undermined with pesky things like facts and constantly have fun poked of you.


I'm sure there must be richer seams of positive feedback for you on t'interweb.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/22242--/page/4/#findComment-544482
Share on other sites

and you wonder why I think you're a bot?


I'll rewrite my last post in small words shall I?


You make me laugh, but really, why do you keep coming back here when everyone thinks you're theories are daft and worthless?

It's a genuine question, one I'd be interested to read a real response to an actual question asked of you for once.


You don't invest much of yourself in this board do you, you just like to swan in with a vague air of superiority and the debating skills of a twelve year old, and deposit strange morsels of internetwattery.


Come on, what team do you support, music, a bit of Wagner as you ponder the impending apocalypse?

What made you distrust authority so, did your nanny read you HP Lovecraft instead of AA Milne, did a journo break the news to you about Santa or something?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/22242--/page/4/#findComment-544572
Share on other sites

...and NN delivers yet more of these weird robotic non-sequiturs. It's couched as a question, but delivered with bathos and inappropriate punctuation.


They don't quite work - they're not quite part of a dialogue. They don't seem to relate to the rest of the thread.


It's like NN's responses are generated from keyword prompts.


I guess they're intended as biting wit, but they feel so wooden - hollow almost.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/22242--/page/4/#findComment-544577
Share on other sites

Ye gods NN, do you know what hubris means? How it can be used in sentences?


You can't be 'drunk on hubris' until after the fact. Had the Birmingham chem trails actually been a terrorist attack and we'd been left looking silly, then we could suffer hubris.


Before the fall, it's simply arrogance. Of which, when faced with mental conspiracy theories, mea culpa.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/22242--/page/4/#findComment-545162
Share on other sites

ultraburner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mind-control chemicals being sprayed upon us from

> seven miles up? Seems entirely plausable to me(tu)

> and probably one of the most efficient ways I can

> think of to administer said chemicals.

>

> Got any links about lizards or spaceships nn?




Again, what part of cloud seeding do you not understand.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_seeding

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/22242--/page/4/#findComment-545224
Share on other sites

Nowhere is immune sadly star-bob.


NN. This thread asserts that contrails are actually chem trails.


The far more likely answer is that they are in fact condensation formed from jets travelling at high altitude.


Someone then posted an article suggesting that terrorists are dumping chemicals high in the sky above Brimingham.

This one too is unsubstantiated speculation.


You then linked to a wikipedia article about cloud seeding.


Either this is just a completely non-sequitur link because you happened to feel like talking about cloud seeding or you are implying that the terrorist attack was actually a terrorist group trying to make it rain over Birmingham.


Yes cloud seeding exists. It has by and large been proven unreliable at any form of weather control, that's not to say noone has ever tried, usually in places suffering sever drought.


Why anyone would cloud seed above Birmingham is anyone's guess. Why terrorists would do so is even more mistifying given the difficulties, enormous costs and limited socio-political effects of some unexpected rain over a large metropolitan area.


Hair bleach is cheaper and things going bang tend to get noticed a bit more when trying to bring society to its knees or force governments into your desired action.


So we're still left with a need for you to answer: What is your point regards the cloud seeding?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/22242--/page/4/#findComment-545233
Share on other sites

Again, what part of cloud seeding do you not understand.


from the link you provided:

"For release by aircraft, silver iodide flares are ignited and dispersed as an aircraft flies through the inflow of a cloud."


Could you explain how this would go un-noticed please, nn? I dont see an awful lot of clouds in the first photo on this thread, and I havent heard any reports of flares being released and ignited from airliners.


And then theres the small matter of the airline companies from many different nations all being highly co-ordinated and secretive in the complex execution of this chemical seeding so that the CIA/Illuminati/aliens/Elvis could control our puny brains with their all-powerful chemical mind-rubbers..... like I said, seems fair enough, doesn't it?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/22242--/page/4/#findComment-545288
Share on other sites

I have frien...acquaintances who are all obsessed with posting chemtrail / conspiracy theory / US Govt / 'facts' on FB. They all have one thing in common: they take an absurd amount of mind-altering drugs. I'm a fan of Ben Goldacre myself...he cool, he clever and I'm guessing doesn't spend his weekends bumping the K.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/22242--/page/4/#findComment-547012
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A A day-school for girls and a boarding school for boys (even with, by the late '90s, a tiny cadre of girls) are very different places.  Though there are some similarities. I think all schools, for instance, have similar "rules", much as they all nail up notices about "potential" and "achievement" and keeping to the left on the stairs. The private schools go a little further, banging on about "serving the public", as they have since they were set up (either to supply the colonies with District Commissioners, Brigadiers and Missionaries, or the provinces with railway engineers), so they've got the language and rituals down nicely. Which, i suppose, is what visitors and day-pupils expect, and are expected, to see. A boarding school, outside the cloistered hours of lesson-times, once the day-pupils and teaching staff have been sent packing, the gates and chapel safely locked and the brochures put away, becomes a much less ambassadorial place. That's largely because they're filled with several hundred bored, tired, self-supervised adolescents condemned to spend the night together in the flickering, dripping bowels of its ancient buildings, most of which were designed only to impress from the outside, the comfort of their occupants being secondary to the glory of whatever piratical benefactor had, in a last-ditch attempt to sway the judgement of their god, chucked a little of their ill-gotten at the alleged improvement of the better class of urchin. Those adolescents may, to the curious eyes of the outer world, seem privileged but, in that moment, they cannot access any outer world (at least pre-1996 or thereabouts). Their whole existence, for months at a time, takes place in uniformity behind those gates where money, should they have any to hand, cannot purchase better food or warmer clothing. In that peculiar world, there is no difference between the seventh son of a murderous sheikh, the darling child of a ball-bearing magnate, the umpteenth Viscount Smethwick, or the offspring of some hapless Foreign Office drone who's got themselves posted to Minsk. They are egalitarian, in that sense, but that's as far as it goes. In any place where rank and priviilege mean nothing, other measures will evolve, which is why even the best-intentioned of committees will, from time to time, spawn its cliques and launch heated disputes over archaic matters that, in any other context, would have long been forgotten. The same is true of the boarding school which, over the dismal centuries, has developed a certain culture all its own, with a language indended to pass all understanding and attitiudes and practices to match. This is unsurprising as every new intake will, being young and disoriented, eagerly mimic their seniors, and so also learn those words and attitudes and practices which, miserably or otherwise, will more accurately reflect the weight of history than the Guardian's style-guide and, to contemporary eyes and ears, seem outlandish, beastly and deplorably wicked. Which, of course, it all is. But however much we might regret it, and urge headteachers to get up on Sundays and preach about how we should all be tolerant, not kill anyone unnecessarily, and take pity on the oiks, it won't make the blindest bit of difference. William Golding may, according to psychologists, have overstated his case but I doubt that many 20th Century boarders would agree with them. Instead, they might look to Shakespeare, who cheerfully exploits differences of sex and race and belief and ability to arm his bullies, murderers, fraudsters and tyrants and remains celebrated to this day,  Admittedly, this is mostly opinion, borne only of my own regrettable experience and, because I had that experience and heard those words (though, being naive and small-townish, i didn't understand them till much later) and saw and suffered a heap of brutishness*, that might make my opinion both unfair and biased.  If so, then I can only say it's the least that those institutions deserve. Sure, the schools themselves don't willingly foster that culture, which is wholly contrary to everything in the brochures, but there's not much they can do about it without posting staff permanently in corridors and dormitories and washrooms, which would, I'd suggest, create a whole other set of problems, not least financial. So, like any other business, they take care of the money and keep aloof from the rest. That, to my mind, is the problem. They've turned something into a business that really shouldn't be a business. Education is one thing, raising a child is another, and limited-liability corporations, however charitable, tend not to make the best parents. And so, in retrospect, I'm inclined not to blame the students either (though, for years after, I eagerly read the my Old School magazine, my heart doing a little dance at every black-edged announcement of a yachting tragedy, avalanche or coup). They get chucked into this swamp where they have to learn to fend for themselves and so many, naturally, will behave like predators in an attempt to fit in. Not all, certainly. Some will keep their heads down and hope not to be noticed while others, if they have a particular talent, might find that it protects them. But that leaves more than enough to keep the toxic culture alive, and it is no surprise at all that when they emerge they appear damaged to the outside world. For that's exactly what they are. They might, and sometimes do, improve once returned to the normal stream of life if given time and support, and that's good. But the damage lasts, all the same, and isn't a reason to vote for them. * Not, if it helps to disappoint any lawyers, at Dulwich, though there's nothing in the allegations that I didn't instantly recognise, 
    • Another recommendation for Lorraine  - if you need help over the holidays, she still has a small amount of availability. Couldn’t recommend her more highly, she’s brilliant with our cat. Message her on 07718 752208 for more details re pricing etc.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...