Jump to content

Recommended Posts

fair point.

Let me rephrase that.

In order to view a docx you would require word 2010 with its lack of backward compatability and its useless and functionally opaque 'ribbon' thing.


Mind you there's nothing in that document that couldn't be presented in good old fashioned ascii in a txt file.

Microsoft Backward! yes! What a bunch of idiots. Really clever move making all your office product's files incompatible. And who are doing well? Apple - ok they have proprietary formats but at least there is cross product /release compatibility.

Microsoft make a lot of mistakes but then they have a HUGE suite of products.


I'm not a big fan of office 2010, but sometimes if you need to do a leap forward you might need to make a break with the past (though in this case I think they got it very wrong, part of their weird obsession with xml).


On the whole I'm ambivalent about them, they also get a lot, on balance, right (though with something like SQL Server it took them 20 years to get there).


But for all the Evilcorp mud that gets thrown at them, Jobs cut Apple's outreach programs and much oif their charitable activity, and Gates gave away 30 billion dollars, so credit where it's due.


And the only other thing I have to say is iTunes *shudders*

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It does seem a common business strategy these days. River Island has just announced a similar restructuring: closing 33 shops and demanding that the landlords of a further 71 locations take a haircut. 
    • If anyone has any spare tickets for Crystal Palace on Sunday let me know!
    • The tenant's business has already failed. If the landlord doesn't accept it, they can have a vacant property, stand in the queue of creditors, and get paid little or nothing. It's a gamble that the restructuring will work and the tenant will start paying rent again. Commercial properties are often hard to let. 🤷
    • An inquiry will put a huge amount of time and resource into looking at what happened in the past and why it happened and who was responsible and, in a year or two maybe more, a report will be produced and actions may or may not be taken, some of those responsible for bad decisions will already have resigned and moved on.   Given that we now already understand some of the issues that allowed this awful behaviour to continue unchallenged, my concern is less about whether there is an inquiry to examine what happened in the past but about what is being done right now to protect girls and young women from predatory and exploitative men in whatever race or identity they come in. Inquiries examine the past but don't necessarily solve problems and they certainly don't come up with conclusions quickly which is why they can often feel hollow.  I'd rather see perpetrators and those that let the perpetrators act with impunity, actually being prosecuted and an inquiry won't do that.  I suspect that's why some MPs voted against an inquiry. But do feel free to give me examples of inquiries that really made a difference and actually changed things in a timely and effective way.      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...