Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Totally agree re the black cabs point - they are driving around continually and claims such as 'all new cabs licensed have to meet the standard' misses the point It shows how strong the cabbie lobby is though!


To be clear - i'm in favour of measures to reduce pollution, so would prefer the ULEZ to go further in its application rather than be scrapped on account of its failings

kford Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Allowing 15-year-old black cabs to continue is

> pathetic. I regularly follow 53/04/54 plate cabs

> belching out soot.



Someone made an FOI request a few years ago asking TfL of the average age of black taxis. Less than 7% were 15 years old. 50% were between 7 and 8 years old.


https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/spread_of_ages_of_londons_black

People are losing there jobs over this

People have to buy expensive vans they cant afford

* Its is just punishing people who use the road


Punishing the drivers

And BIKERS



nxjen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> When did dismissing something as ?just a money

> making scheme? become a reason for it not to be

> valid?

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Does anybody know if Park Lane and the route from

> Vauxhall to Edgeware is exempt from the ULEZ

> charge or not?

> This is the case I believe for congestion so I was

> wondering if it is the same for ULEZ.


ULEZ follows the same mapped route as the congestion zone. So Vauxhall/Park Lane/ Edgware Road all remain outside the ULEZ and therefore are exempt. Which makes sense when you consider this is the main route from south London up towards the M1 and north.


Louisa.

cella Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why?



Because they help ease congestion and hence already alleviate pollution.


It is hard to take this scheme seriously when disgusting noxious old black cabs are allowed to continue to pollute. I had to walk through the Euston station underground car park recently, past a line of 50 odd black cabs waiting for customers. All just sat there with their engines idling. I had to put my jumper over my mouth to stop myself being sick.

Black cabs are highly regulated, and drivers have almost no choice in the vehicle they buy, so it makes sense these are outside the ULEZ scheme.

There is a separate scheme already in place to modernise the black cab fleet (indeed for new cabs the emission requirements are much stricter than ULEZ).


Willard Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> cella Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Why?

>

>

> Because they help ease congestion and hence

> already alleviate pollution.

>

> It is hard to take this scheme seriously when

> disgusting noxious old black cabs are allowed to

> continue to pollute. I had to walk through the

> Euston station underground car park recently, past

> a line of 50 odd black cabs waiting for customers.

> All just sat there with their engines idling. I

> had to put my jumper over my mouth to stop myself

> being sick.

Sorry if it's been mentioned before, but cul-de-sacs off the wrong side of the south circular may become expensive car parks.


Residents of Allison Grove and Ryecotes Mead are potentially looking forward to driving 20 yards out of their road, spending a whole day driving outside the ULEZ and then returning home to find that those last few yards have cost them ?12.50.

Well currently theres a whole list of exemptions for residents etc:

https://tfl.gov.uk/modes/driving/ultra-low-emission-zone/discounts-and-exemptions?intcmp=52218


So perhaps when it's extended in Octover there'll be a similar grace period covering the new zones?


Its just a money making scheme


Good. If TfL are making money, that means it can be reinvested in better public transport and more cycle lanes and if ULEZ / congestion charging is keeping private cars off the roads then the roads will be quieter and easier to get around on anyway.

ULEZ area is free for petrol cars built 2006 or later, and diesels 2015 or later. So not exactly restricted to new cars and vans, etc.

Circa half the particulates come from non engine related activity - clutch use, brakes, etc.

The ULEZ will also mean those living in the Congestion Charging Zone will finally have an incentive to consider their car use - they currently receive 90% discount on CCZ fees.

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ULEZ area is free for petrol cars built 2006 or

> later, and diesels 2012 or later. So not exactly

> restricted to new cars and vans, etc.

> Circa half the particulates come from non engine

> related activity - clutch use, brakes, etc.

> The ULEZ will also mean those living in the

> Congestion Charging Zone will finally have an

> incentive to consider their car use - they

> currently receive 90% discount on CCZ fees.



Hi James. My diesel car was registered in July 2013 but sadly falls into the charging. I'm not sure where the 2012 information came from?

  • 5 weeks later...

Willard Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> cella Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Why?

>

>

> Because they help ease congestion and hence

> already alleviate pollution.

>

> It is hard to take this scheme seriously when

> disgusting noxious old black cabs are allowed to

> continue to pollute. I had to walk through the

> Euston station underground car park recently, past

> a line of 50 odd black cabs waiting for customers.

> All just sat there with their engines idling. I

> had to put my jumper over my mouth to stop myself

> being sick.


I can't believe that Black Cabs have been exempted - they're heavily polluting and drive around all day looking for fares, or sit with their engines idling. They must make up a significant percentage of the pollution in Central London.

Because they free up traffic therefore should be Exempt from ULEZ


Sally Eva Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't understand the relevance of this.

>

> natty01295 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Motorcycles,Motor Scooters

> > Don't get stuck in traffic like Cars do !!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thankyou so so much tam. Your def a at angle. I was so so worried. Your a good man, we need more like your good self in the world.  Thankyou for the bottom of my heart. Pepper is pleased to be back
    • I have your cat , she’s fine , you can phone me on 07883 065 076 , I’m still up and can bring her to you now (1.15 AM Sunday) if not tonight then tomorrow afternoon or evening ? I’ve DM’d you in here as well 
    • This week's edition of The Briefing Room I found really useful and impressively informative on the training aspect.  David Aaronovitch has come a long way since his University Challenge day. 😉  It's available to hear online or download as mp3. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m002n7wv In a few days time resident doctors -who used to be known as junior doctors - were meant to be going on strike. This would be the 14th strike by the doctors’ union since March 2023. The ostensible reason was pay but now the dispute may be over without more increases to salary levels. The Government has instead made an offer to do something about the other big issue for early career doctors - working conditions and specialist training places. David Aaronovitch and guests discuss what's going on and ask what the problem is with the way we in Britain train our doctors? Guests: Hugh Pym, BBC Health Editor Sir Andrew Goddard, Consultant Gastroenterologist Professor Martin McKee, Professor of European Public Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Mark Dayan, Policy Analyst, Nuffield Trust. Presenter: David Aaronovitch Producers: Caroline Bayley, Kirsteen Knight, Cordelia Hemming Production Co-ordinator: Maria Ogundele Sound Engineers: Michael Regaard, Gareth Jones Editor: Richard Vadon  
    • That was one that the BBC seem to have lost track of.  But they do still have quite a few. These are some in their 60s archive. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m0028zp6
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...