Jump to content

Spellings


womanofdulwich

Recommended Posts

Apologies WOD but I was under the spell of a spelling-fit for a spell there even though I knew it could spell disaster.


As Shakespeare/Shakespere/Shakespear/Shakspeare/Shackspeare/Shakspere/Shackespeare/Shackspere/Shackespere/Shaxspere/ Shexpere...etc. himself and other Elizabethans took a fairly relaxed approach to spelling, and sometimes relied on phonetic spelling to get their meaning across, I, as a modern Elizabethan, take a similarly relaxed view.


But the next person to say "Would of..." or "Could of..." will get shrift of the shortest kind...


...and thus risk remaining unshriven.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

womanofdulwich Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not in this case Voyageur-spellings are countable

> nouns- but you are correct it could be the verb

> "spelling".


Atticus and Voyageur are delightfully correct.


"Spelling" is the gerund of a verb. You can, if you wish, use it as a verbal noun, such as in "her spelling is poor"; that is what gerunds are for. But to claim a gerund as a countable noun, and then to pluralize it, is a manifest error that would once have warranted corporal punishment.


Would a jogger take "runnings" in the park, or a diner take their "eatings" in a restaurant? The line between grammar and insanity is finer than many think and, with respect, I suggest that the orthographical mishaps of others should be the least of WoD's worries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Burbage Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> womanofdulwich Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Not in this case Voyageur-spellings are

> countable

> > nouns- but you are correct it could be the verb

> > "spelling".

>

> Atticus and Voyageur are delightfully correct.

>

> "Spelling" is the gerund of a verb. You can, if

> you wish, use it as a verbal noun, such as in "her

> spelling is poor"; that is what gerunds are for.


Grammar and insanity, indeed! Ending a sentence with a preposition, whatever next I ask you?!

;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> "Spelling" is the gerund of a verb. You can, if you wish, use it as a verbal noun, such as in

> "her spelling is poor"; that is what gerunds are for. But to claim a gerund as a countable noun,

> and then to pluralize it, is a manifest error that would once have warranted corporal punishment.


Cf entry 2b below.


From the OED Second edition, 1989; online version March 2012:


spelling, n.2


1.


a. The action, practice, or art of naming the letters of words, of reading letter by letter, or of expressing words by letters.

[... eg]

1809?10 S. T. Coleridge Friend (1837) III. 343 There is one branch of learning without which learning itself cannot be railed at with common decency, namely, spelling.

1871 J. Earle Philol. Eng. Tongue ii. 121 That which we call a settled orthography is a habit of spelling which admits only of rare modification.

...


2.


a. Manner of expressing or writing words with letters; orthography. Also fig.

[... eg]

1697 C. Leslie Snake in Grass (ed. 2) 112 By some unusual Spelling of some words.

1894 W. M. Lindsay Lat. Lang. i. ?12 However natural it may appear for the Romans to have adopted Greek spelling.

...

b. A particular instance of this; a special collocation of letters representing a word.

[...eg]

1738 Swift Compl. Coll. Genteel Conversat. p. l, Of these Spellings the Publick will meet with many Examples.

1758 J. Armstrong Sketches 18 An Author seems reduced to great Extremities, who flies to new Spellings to distinguish himself.

1811 Scott Let. Sept. (1932) II. 543 All the licenses of using obsolete words and uncommon spellings.

1894 W. M. Lindsay Lat. Lang. i. ?8 The dates at which these spellings are first found on inscriptions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But you have to assess whether these persistent drivers are creating more safety issues than diverting emergency vehicles on a longer route and clearly they are not. The fact members of the pro-closure lobby have built their argument on this actually shows how desperate, some would say selfish, they are to have the junction closed and just the way they want it. And unfortunately they seem to have the council over a barrel on something as the council weakly concedes to their position without hesitation. Was this not borne from an FOI that said one of the emergency services confirmed that they had not been consulted on the new DV design that Cllr Leeming then said was actually a mistake by the emergency services - and then it's a case of whether you believe Cllr Leeming or not....and his track record is hardly unblemished when it comes to all things LTNs? Exactly! When the "small vocal minority" was given a mouthpiece that proved it was anything other than small then some have repeatedly tried to discredit the mouthpiece.  The far-left has never been very good at accountability and One Dulwich is forcing our local councillors and council to be accountable to constituents and it wouldn't surprise me if the council are behind a lot of the depositioning activities as One Dulwich is stopping them from getting CPZs rolled out and must be seen as a huge thorn in the side of the idealogical plan they have. Southwark Labour has a long track record of trying to stifle constituents with a view that differs from theirs (see Cllr Leo Pollack for one example) or depositioning anyone trying to represent them (see Cllr Williams during the infamous Cllr Rose "mansplaining" episode. But you know, some think it's One Dulwich that are the greatest threat to local democracy and should not be trusted! 😉
    • A song thrush visited my back garden today. I watched as it smashed open a snail by whacking it against the patio.
    • I have no doubt that local people are genuinely involved (and personally can understand their not wanting to publicise their involvement). That said the proliferation of One groups across London and the degree of co-ordination suggests it is more than just a local grassroots group. I’m not really that interested, except that many of their supporters do bang on about transparency and accountability. I would be interested in the substance of their latest missive. Who has been pressurising the emergency services and how? Who genuinely believes that people are partially covering their plates and driving through due to inadequate signage? Sounds a little ridiculous / desperate. It feels like it may be time for them to start coming to terms with the changes tbh.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...